Hawthorn sure get their players to put on the weight if you look at a simple equation of (weight in kg + 100) - (height in cm). I guess it's a kind of BMI. So many Hawks weights are greater than the last two digits of their height.
Hawthorn (bold - premiership 22):
+19 Dew
+11 Campbell
+9 Guerra, Croad
+8 Roughead
+7 Hodge
+6 Lewis, Ladson, Crawford
+5 Mitchell, Williams, Franklin, Brown, Taylor
+3 Osbourne, Bateman, Sewell
+2 Rioli, McGlynn
+1 Boyle
Ev Tuck, Clarke, Dawson, Stokes#
-----------------------
-1 Birchall, Murphy
-2 Gilham, Bailey, McEntee
-3 Young, Renouf, Muston
-4 Dowler, Whitecross
-7 Ellis, Thorp, Moss, Morton, Kennedy
Only 5 of their premiership 22 were subpar and of those only Ellis was below -3 because he's only 20. 13 premiership Hawks were greater than +3 and most in their prime.
Compare that to Richmond: (bold - our 'best' 22)
+9 Richo
+8 Collard#
+6 Gourdis
+4 Simmonds
+3 Bowden, Johnson, Jackson
+2 Newman, Schulz, Pattison
+1 Tuck, White, Pettifer
Ev Deledio, Tambling, Foley, Hughes, King, Coughlan, Thomson
----------------------------------------
-1 Polak
-2 Browny
-3 Moore, Raines, Silvester#
-4 Rance, Connors, Graham
-5 Cotchin, McGuane, Howat#
-6 Riewoldt, Morton, Polo, Cartledge#
-7 McMahon, Meyer, JON
-8 Thursfield, Casserly
-9 Edwards
-12 Putt, Collins
Shows how many younger and lighter bodies we have. 9 Tiges in our 'best' 22 are subpar on this weight to height scale and 7 are below -3. Only two - big Richo and Simmo who are both over 30 - are greater than +3.
Geelong as expected being an older side have mostly bigger bodies: (bold - grand final 22)
+15 Hunt
+8 Chapman
+6 Ottens, Ablett, Hawkins
+5 Ling, Egan, West
+4 Mooney, Rooke, Enright, Tenace, Djerrkura
+3 Scarlett, Milburn, Stokes, D.Johnson
+2 Harley, Kelly, Lonergan, Byrnes, Prismall
+1 Bartel, Selwood, Blake, Donohue
Ev Wojcinski
-------------------------------
-1 S.Johnson, D.Simpson
-2 Varcoe, Taylor
-3 Corey, Davenport
-4 Gamble, S.Simpson
-7 Mackie, Hogan
-10 McKenna
Like Hawthorn only 5 players subpar and only Mackie was below -3. Not as many Cats above +3 but they still have eight of them.
Chuck in the Bulldogs who are considered lighter on (bold - Prelim Final 22)
+11 Hahn
+9 Hudson, Lake
+8 Akermanis
+7 Minson
+6 Boyd, McDougall
+5 Johnson, Higgins, West, Williams
+4 Cooney, Eagleton
+3 Gilbee
+2 Morris, Skipper
+1 Giansiracusa, Welsh, Callan
------------------------------
-1 Cross, Street
-2 Griffen
-3 Tiller, Ray, Wight, Addison, Wood
-4 Murphy, Harbrow, Stack
-5 Hargrave
-6 Everitt, O'Shea
-7 Hill
-8 O'Keefe
-9 Ward
-10 Lynch
-11 Reid, Boumann
-12 Grant
7 subpar dogs in their PF 22 and 4 below -3 so more lighter bodies than the Hawks and Cats. 10 bullies are +3 surprisingly but that includes 2 ruckmen and 4 oldies.
Okay yes all this means stuff all as far as who can or can't play football but like the Player Age breakdowns it demonstrates we've got a fair way to go even if we were to make the finals next year. These figures are from the start of the year so hopefully our cubs get into the weights again over summer and bulk up more. Add to that we recruit like last year draftees who have some bodysize already and will fill out even further.