Favourite player game

[Mopsy]

10-Deledio
10 Richardson
10 Cotchin
9- Moore
8-Foley
8-Tuck
2-Tambling
2-Simmonds
2-White

+1 Moore
-1 Tambling

[tigersalive]

Richo got to 10 so he is spent, much like Cotch is now.  Also it's clear who he was referring to so I dont see the nickname problem.

Also your post above is inaccurate. Tuck is on 7 due to Torch's vote.  I'm also unaware where Simmo lost a vote.  ???


9 - Moore
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
3 - White
1 - Tambling

+ White
- Tambling

[Mopsy]

Richo got to 10 so he is spent, much like Cotch is now.  Also it's clear who he was referring to so I dont see the nickname problem.

Also your post above is inaccurate. Tuck is on 7 due to Torch's vote.  I'm also unaware where Simmo lost a vote.  ???


9 - Moore
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
3 - White
1 - Tambling

+ White
- Tambling

sorry but that is not how the rules read -in the final all voting ends when there is one man standing

[Mopsy]

Richo got to 10 so he is spent, much like Cotch is now.  Also it's clear who he was referring to so I dont see the nickname problem.

Also your post above is inaccurate. Tuck is on 7 due to Torch's vote.  I'm also unaware where Simmo lost a vote.  ???


9 - Moore
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
3 - White
1 - Tambling

+ White
- Tambling

apology- Simmonds was a typographical error on my part agree should be 3

[Bene Boy]

  so where are we then total still not divisable by 10 umps please bounce the ball

[torch]

8 - Moore
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
3 - White
2 - Tambling

+ 1 - Tambling

- 1 - Moore

[tigersalive]

Richo got to 10 so he is spent, much like Cotch is now.  Also it's clear who he was referring to so I dont see the nickname problem.

Also your post above is inaccurate. Tuck is on 7 due to Torch's vote.  I'm also unaware where Simmo lost a vote.  ???


9 - Moore
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
3 - White
1 - Tambling

+ White
- Tambling

sorry but that is not how the rules read -in the final all voting ends when there is one man standing

I was unaware the rules were different from the last groups we did but I now see how it's working this time. 

It seems many other people are unaware of it too.

[Chuck17]

I think we are here

10-Deledio
10 Richardson
10 Cotchin
9 - Moore
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
2 - White
2 - Tambling

+1 Moore
-1 White

[1965]

10 Richardson
10 Cotchin
10 - Moore
9-Deledio
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
2 - White
2 - Tambling

+1 Moore
-1 Lids

[Chuck17]

10 Richardson
10 Cotchin
10 - Moore
9-Deledio
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
2 - White
2 - Tambling

+1 Moore
-1 Lids

Was that -1 or -10 off Lids? 

[1965]

10 Richardson
10 Cotchin
10 - Moore
9-Deledio
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
2 - White
2 - Tambling

+1 Moore
-1 Lids

Was that -1 or -10 off Lids? 

wot u talking bout man

[Chuck17]

10 Richardson
10 Cotchin
10 - Moore
9-Deledio
8 - Foley
7 - Tuck
3 - Simmonds
2 - White
2 - Tambling

+1 Moore
-1 Lids

Was that -1 or -10 off Lids? 

wot u talking bout man

Oops my apologies going blind in my old age I thought you dropped him off 

[torch]

can somebody fix this up?

[1965]

can somebody fix this up?

I think it is all good now.

[Bene Boy]

MT ur maths was wrong here   didnt take a point of Jackson

We've got all summer  lol

8-Richardson
8-Moore
8-Cotchin
8-Deledio
8-Foley
6-Tuck
4-Tambling
4-Simmonds
3-White
4-Jackson


Moore +1
Jacko -1