Author Topic: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials  (Read 2672 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« on: December 15, 2008, 05:47:41 PM »
AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
afl.com.au
Mon 15 December, 2008

1. Minor rule changes for the 2009 Toyota AFL Premiership Season

Mr Anderson said the minor rule changes that would automatically come into effect for the 2009 Toyota AFL Premiership Season included:

a) Recall badly offline bounces: An umpire will recall a field or centre bounce when the bounce does not allow for the ball to be contested by both teams.
b) Free kick for misconduct: A free kick can now be paid for incidents of misconduct such as interfering with an injured player. Previously misconduct was the only offence which was reportable but for which a free kick could not be paid.
c) Restart of play following a stretcher: If one team has possession when play is stopped for a stretcher, that same team will retain possession when play is re-started.
d) 50m penalty awarded after all clear is given but before play has re-started: A free kick to the defending team during this time will be taken where infringement occurred or 50m from the kick-off line. This change makes the rules consistent with those already in place for when a free kick is given away after a mark or free kick has been awarded.

2. New interpretations for the 2009 Toyota AFL Premiership Season

The two new interpretations that will automatically come into effect for the 2009 Toyota AFL Premiership Season are as follows:

- Scoring line to be drawn so the back of the line is equal with the back of the padding rather than being through the centre of the posts (to ensure goal umpires are using a consistent frame of reference regardless of their line of sight);
- If the field umpire impedes a player when in the act of setting the mark for a shot on goal, the field umpire will stop play and reset the mark so no player is disadvantaged in this situation.

3. Change to AFL regulations for the 2009 Toyota AFL Premiership Season

The penalty for a breach of the interchange regulations has been modified to be simpler and more proportionate. The penalty for an interchange breach will now be a free kick plus 50 metre penalty from wherever play is stopped. Previously the ball was taken to the centre of the ground and then a 50 metre penalty was awarded.

In addition to these changes, four boundary umpires will now be used on a permanent basis from the 2009 NAB Cup onwards following a successful trial from Round 21 through to the grand final in the 2008 Toyota AFL Premiership Season.

4. NAB Cup / NAB Challenge rules for potential introduction in 2009 Toyota AFL Premiership Season

a) A free kick will now be awarded for any deliberate rushed behind

Mr Anderson explained that clubs had raised the issue of deliberate rushed behinds as part of the consultation process and a number of options had been discussed.

"The clear majority of clubs and coaches thought that deliberate rushed behinds are having a negative impact on the game and support the trial of a rule to discourage the tactic.

"The strong feedback the AFL received after the grand final was that clubs and coaches would deliberately rush more and more behinds if the rule was not changed."

He said two key statistics helped explain why the AFL did not select the option of disallowing the player who rushes the ball from kicking it in, or disallowing the kick in until the flags were waved. These two statistics are:

1) Less than a quarter of kick-ins following a deliberate rushed behind are taken before the flags are waved; and
2) Only 45 per cent of deliberately rushed behinds are kicked in by the player who rushes the behind.

"The options of a bounce 25m out from goal or a boundary throw-in from the behind post were carefully considered, but not selected because they create extra stoppages and time delays which increase the opportunity for teams to flood.

"The option of a free kick for a deliberate rushed behind was adopted because it is the simplest option, the greatest deterrent, and is most consistent with the current Laws of the Game.

"A free kick is already paid for deliberately putting the ball out of play in all other areas around the ground and this option allows for similar criteria to be used in the case of deliberate rushed behinds."

The benefit of the doubt will be given to a defender who is under direct pressure in a contest, or whose primary goal is to spoil or touch the ball before it goes through for a goal. Examples of what constitutes a deliberate rushed behind will be included on the Laws of the Game DVD to be released by the AFL umpiring department early in 2009.

b) Umpires to award a 50 metre penalty in addition to a free kick for players who tackle or hold an opponent after the opponent has disposed of the football, for the purpose of preventing them from taking part in the next act of play or being able to run on to the next contest

Mr Anderson said the free after disposal trial was in response to an emerging trend where players were being unfairly hindered after being involved in an act of play.

"We have seen that players are prepared to give away a free kick by putting an opposition player down after disposing of the ball to prevent them from running onto the next contest. Currently only a free kick is awarded and this can be an insufficient deterrent," he said.

c) Continue the trial of the no-go zone behind umpires at centre bounces

The centre bounce no-go zone resulted in a decrease in player-umpire contact when used in the 2008 NAB Cup and so the no-go zone will be trialled again to monitor its impact on the incidence of contact with umpires at centre bounces.

"Each of these three trial rules will be evaluated following the NAB Cup and NAB Challenge to determine whether it is appropriate for them to be introduced for the 2009 Toyota AFL Premiership Season," Mr Anderson said.

5. Other NAB Cup rules

Feedback from the clubs and coaches indicated they would like to see the rules of the NAB Cup brought more in line with the rules of the Toyota AFL Premiership Season to assist with player preparation.

In light of this feedback, Mr Anderson said the following alterations had been made to the rules that were part of the 2008 NAB Cup:
a) Interchange system: Remove the restriction on the number of interchanges permitted that was used in the 2008 NAB Cup and introduce a system of two substitute players in addition to six standard interchange players;
b) Remove the rule allowing play on when ball hits goal or behind post; and
c) Remove the ball being thrown back into play 10m in from boundary line.

The rules used in the 2008 NAB Cup to be retained for the 2009 NAB Cup are;
a) No marks for backward kicks in the defensive half of the ground;
b) Nine points for a goal from outside 50m;
c) Ball to be thrown up around the ground; and
d) Distance for a kick to be awarded a mark retained at 20m

The above rules will also be used in 2009 NAB Challenge matches except for (b), nine points for a goal from outside 50m.

http://www.afl.com.au/News/NEWSARTICLE/tabid/208/Default.aspx?newsId=70858

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2008, 10:29:57 PM »
a) A free kick will now be awarded for any deliberate rushed behind

"The option of a free kick for a deliberate rushed behind was adopted because it is the simplest option, the greatest deterrent, and is most consistent with the current Laws of the Game.

"A free kick is already paid for deliberately putting the ball out of play in all other areas around the ground and this option allows for similar criteria to be used in the case of deliberate rushed behinds."

The benefit of the doubt will be given to a defender who is under direct pressure in a contest, or whose primary goal is to spoil or touch the ball before it goes through for a goal. Examples of what constitutes a deliberate rushed behind will be included on the Laws of the Game DVD to be released by the AFL umpiring department early in 2009.
So we're going from a clear cut rule on rushed behinds (it's one point to the opposition) to one that relies on more umpire interpretation  :banghead.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2008, 10:49:23 PM »
If it aint broke why fix it. :banghead

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2009, 02:05:03 PM »
After watching the games on the weekend, the new rushed behind rule is already a farce  :banghead. LOL Gilbee not being pinged for handballing through the points. Then there was Sam Fisher punching the ball back through and the ump calling it a "contest" even though there wasn't an opposition player within 10m of him  ???. The new rule also leads to more handball in defence instead of just rushing it through the old way and taking a quick kick.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
AFL seems certain to give green light to rush rule (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2009, 01:20:11 AM »
AFL seems certain to give green light to rush rule
Mark Stevens and Jon Ralph | March 11, 2009

D-DAY arrives tomorrow for the AFL's contentious trial rushed behind rule.

The rule will be at the top of the agenda when the Laws of the Game Committee meets.

The clubs' views will be considered when the committee decides whether to recommend the rule be used in the home-and-away season.

Clubs have also been asked to comment on the other possible changes for the home-and-away: the no-go zone at centre bounces and the 50m penalty and free kick for dumping a player after he has disposed of the ball.

The laws committee's views will be put to the AFL Commission, which will meet tomorrow week.

Rushed behinds have nearly halved in this year's NAB Cup.

Despite some teething problems, it seems the new interpretation is working.

In the 2008 premiership season, there were 6.09 rushed behinds a game.

That figure has dropped to 3.5 in the 14 NAB Cup games, with defenders clearly trying to keep the ball alive.

The AFL Commission seems likely to rubber-stamp the rule's introduction.

Champion Data statistics show the rule would greatly benefit Geelong. Its opponents last year took an extreme no-risk policy in the defensive 50.

The Cats' opponents rushed 109 behinds - 49 more than 16th-placed Melbourne - including 11 by Hawthorn in the Grand Final.

The statistics show Hawthorn's safety-first rushing policy in the decider was no one-off.

It rushed 98 behinds for the season, nearly four a game, and clearly a competition high.

While Geelong's high level of 50m entries was reflected in its total of rushed behinds for (109), Hawthorn benefited from only 65 rushed behinds.

The Hawks' controversial but successful tactics also look set to change a second rule.

Last year the Hawks consistently dumped a player who had offloaded the ball and was about to receive it again.

Under NAB Cup rules, if a player about to take possession is dumped, he is given a free kick and 50m penalty.

In two NAB Cup games this year, Hawthorn has rushed eight behinds, equal with Collingwood in three games.

The Hawks are happy with the trial rule because clubs believe the teams with the most dangerous forward lines will benefit from the extra pressure the rule brings.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25168808-19742,00.html

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2009, 06:35:08 PM »
How can you say a new rule has been successful when it has a 100% error rate :help. Both times the deliberate rushed behind has been called by the umpire it was the wrong decision  :banghead.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40310
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2009, 09:06:25 PM »
How can you say a new rule has been successful when it has a 100% error rate :help. Both times the deliberate rushed behind has been called by the umpire it was the wrong decision  :banghead.

Correct

Let's just see how "happy" everyone is with it when it actually costs a game that has 4 premiership points riding on it

Worst still if it costs a team a place in the finals or costs a team a finals win  :banghead

"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline DallasCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • roll on 2011
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2009, 09:15:42 PM »
Worst still if it costs a team a place in the finals or costs a team a finals win  :banghead

Yeah like Sydney fielding 19 players and costing us a spot in the finals last year!!!

They seriously can't bring in this rule. It's wrong. Yep the Joel Bowden thing was ugly, but it backfire one day and they will realise the rule isn't necessary.
Experience is a good school. But the fees are high.
Heinrich Heine

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2009, 09:19:04 PM »
Should have just removed the quick kick out.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2009, 04:11:00 PM »
SEN just said the AFL has confirmed that two of the three rules trialled in the NAB Cup will be adopted:

* The rushed behind rule

* A 50m penalty awarded if a player is dumped or tackled after disposal.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2009, 06:27:20 AM »
Adrian Anderson on 3aw last night - "I'm sure the umpires will the intepret the rushed behind rule as well as they do the other rules"

 :help  :banghead
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2009, 03:10:45 AM »
$#*! Anderson

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2009, 07:42:02 PM »
$#*! Anderson
:rollin  :thumbsup

He was actually proud of fact 14% of all umpiring decisons were wrong. That's 1 in every 7 free kicks :-\. I'm not blaming the umps either. It must be a nightmare being an ump these days with this clown changing interpretations and introducing new rules every bloody year  :banghead.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: AFL announces Laws of the Game changes, trials
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2009, 09:08:23 PM »
$#*! Anderson
:rollin  :thumbsup

He was actually proud of fact 14% of all umpiring decisons were wrong. That's 1 in every 7 free kicks :-\. I'm not blaming the umps either. It must be a nightmare being an ump these days with this clown changing interpretations and introducing new rules every bloody year  :banghead.

That's what happens when you get a lawyer running the comp.
AFL is no longer an acronym for Australian Football League but Anderson Football Laws  :banghead