Author Topic: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?  (Read 5357 times)

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #30 on: September 05, 2009, 02:51:55 AM »
Hughes
Riewoldt
Schulz
McGuane

If they all step up next year to play 22 games and are not on the fringes of selection each week, then we'll make the finals.

Just shows your wonderfull knowledge of the game they call Australian Rules, :lol
Hughes and Schulz , this would have to be the funniest post for a long long time :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :lol

You must struggle to understand the word "if."

Infamy was spot on. IF those four had all stepped up we would have had a decent spine and structure and probably have made the finals.

It was never a prediction that they were going to have a good year.
Good to see some know how to read, cheers TA, shame it needed explaining

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #31 on: September 05, 2009, 03:26:10 AM »
Simmo, Brown, Moore = rubbish

Richo got hurt

Thursty was average

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #32 on: September 05, 2009, 07:22:29 AM »
Hughes
Riewoldt
Schulz
McGuane

If they all step up next year to play 22 games and are not on the fringes of selection each week, then we'll make the finals.

Just shows your wonderfull knowledge of the game they call Australian Rules, :lol
Hughes and Schulz , this would have to be the funniest post for a long long time :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :lol

You must struggle to understand the word "if."

Infamy was spot on. IF those four had all stepped up we would have had a decent spine and structure and probably have made the finals.

It was never a prediction that they were going to have a good year.

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

1965

  • Guest
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2009, 07:33:27 AM »

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You really do lose credibility when you consistently show your inability to spell words correctly.

Hopefully you can't use "too much to drink" as an excuse at 7:30am.

 :cheers

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #34 on: September 05, 2009, 08:15:35 AM »
Hughes
Riewoldt
Schulz
McGuane

If they all step up next year to play 22 games and are not on the fringes of selection each week, then we'll make the finals.

Just shows your wonderfull knowledge of the game they call Australian Rules, :lol
Hughes and Schulz , this would have to be the funniest post for a long long time :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :lol

You must struggle to understand the word "if."

Infamy was spot on. IF those four had all stepped up we would have had a decent spine and structure and probably have made the finals.

It was never a prediction that they were going to have a good year.

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You just confirmed you struggle to understand the word "if."     :o   
EAT EM ALIVE!

1965

  • Guest
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #35 on: September 05, 2009, 08:21:47 AM »

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You really do lose credibility when you consistently show your inability to spell words correctly.

Hopefully you can't use "too much to drink" as an excuse at 7:30am.

 :cheers

Not to mention your use of "Your" not "You're" as well.

 :thumbsup

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #36 on: September 05, 2009, 08:27:38 AM »

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You really do lose credibility when you consistently show your inability to spell words correctly.

Hopefully you can't use "too much to drink" as an excuse at 7:30am.

 :cheers

I cant multi task, thats my problem, LOL

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #37 on: September 05, 2009, 08:30:10 AM »
Hughes
Riewoldt
Schulz
McGuane

If they all step up next year to play 22 games and are not on the fringes of selection each week, then we'll make the finals.

Just shows your wonderfull knowledge of the game they call Australian Rules, :lol
Hughes and Schulz , this would have to be the funniest post for a long long time :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :lol

You must struggle to understand the word "if."

Infamy was spot on. IF those four had all stepped up we would have had a decent spine and structure and probably have made the finals.

It was never a prediction that they were going to have a good year.

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You just confirmed you struggle to understand the word "if."     :o   

AS SO HAS THE RFC, LOL
Only if we picked him instead of him
Only if he was a better kick.
Only if he had a half as brain, he would of been a better player.
Only if we signed Wallace to a 2 year contract instead of 5.
Only if we drafted Pav instead of Fiora.
ONLY IF

Offline tigers_of_old_1980

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #38 on: September 05, 2009, 09:22:48 AM »
Is it time for this thread to look ahead at 2010?  Would love to hear who everyone rates next season!

10 PREMIERSHIPS

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #39 on: September 05, 2009, 09:26:06 AM »
Hughes
Riewoldt
Schulz
McGuane

If they all step up next year to play 22 games and are not on the fringes of selection each week, then we'll make the finals.

Just shows your wonderfull knowledge of the game they call Australian Rules, :lol
Hughes and Schulz , this would have to be the funniest post for a long long time :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :lol

You must struggle to understand the word "if."

Infamy was spot on. IF those four had all stepped up we would have had a decent spine and structure and probably have made the finals.

It was never a prediction that they were going to have a good year.

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You just confirmed you struggle to understand the word "if."     :o   

AS SO HAS THE RFC, LOL
Only if we picked him instead of him
Only if he was a better kick.
Only if he had a half as brain, he would of been a better player.
Only if we signed Wallace to a 2 year contract instead of 5.
Only if we drafted Pav instead of Fiora.
ONLY IF

Oh good.  You now know what it means.

Now you can go back and correctly apply it to Infamy's post.
EAT EM ALIVE!

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #40 on: September 05, 2009, 09:45:11 AM »
Hughes
Riewoldt
Schulz
McGuane

If they all step up next year to play 22 games and are not on the fringes of selection each week, then we'll make the finals.

Just shows your wonderfull knowledge of the game they call Australian Rules, :lol
Hughes and Schulz , this would have to be the funniest post for a long long time :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :lol

You must struggle to understand the word "if."

Infamy was spot on. IF those four had all stepped up we would have had a decent spine and structure and probably have made the finals.

It was never a prediction that they were going to have a good year.

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You just confirmed you struggle to understand the word "if."     :o   

AS SO HAS THE RFC, LOL
Only if we picked him instead of him
Only if he was a better kick.
Only if he had a half as brain, he would of been a better player.
Only if we signed Wallace to a 2 year contract instead of 5.
Only if we drafted Pav instead of Fiora.
ONLY IF

haha dont worry Jackstar  ;D
Uni students teaching us older generation how to spell & put sentences together  :lol
its ok my friend cause when you need them to do anything practical like work  ;D They shy away & run to the doctors to get medical certificates for Centrelink payments.
they live on several forums all day & collect off us taxpayers

1965

  • Guest
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #41 on: September 05, 2009, 10:04:06 AM »
haha dont worry Jackstar  ;D
Uni students teaching us older generation how to spell & put sentences together  :lol
its ok my friend cause when you need them to do anything practical like work  ;D They shy away & run to the doctors to get medical certificates for Centrelink payments.
they live on several forums all day & collect off us taxpayers

I wish I was a Uni student again

A couple of lectures in the morning then the afternoon down the "Nott" sitting in the beer garden talking politics and philosophy.

Those were the days.

 :cheers
« Last Edit: September 05, 2009, 04:26:37 PM by 1965 »

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #42 on: September 05, 2009, 12:17:25 PM »
haha dont worry Jackstar  ;D
Uni students teaching us older generation how to spell & put sentences together  :lol
its ok my friend cause when you need them to do anything practical like work  ;D They shy away & run to the doctors to get medical certificates for Centrelink payments.
they live on several forums all day & collect off us taxpayers

I wish I was a Uni student again

A couple of lectures in the mrning then the afternoon down the "Nott" sitting in the beer garden talking politics and philosophy.

Those were the days.

 :cheers

I never went to Uni until I was in my 40's and I already had the arvo's in the pub down pat by then!!  Spelling, grammar and maths were taught at Primary School in my day but I'm not sure what gets taught at that level now.  Texting 101, How To Twitter, Beginning Disrespect, maybe?

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #43 on: September 05, 2009, 01:25:57 PM »

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You really do lose credibility when you consistently show your inability to spell words correctly.

Hopefully you can't use "too much to drink" as an excuse at 7:30am.

 :cheers

Not to mention your use of "Your" not "You're" as well.

 :thumbsup

sorry i know im not involved in this but seriously who gives a fu.. get a life.

he doesn't how to spell, neither does he. I mean how old are you. 12. No one cares pal

Loser
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

1965

  • Guest
Re: 4 most important Tigers for 2009?
« Reply #44 on: September 05, 2009, 03:33:19 PM »

Your all clowns.
To even contemplate the thought of schulz and hughes just shows hows deluded some are.
Lets extend the contracts for these 2 shell we ;) ;) Ooooooooooops, they already did with Schulz last year :lol :lol

You really do lose credibility when you consistently show your inability to spell words correctly.

Hopefully you can't use "too much to drink" as an excuse at 7:30am.

 :cheers

Not to mention your use of "Your" not "You're" as well.

 :thumbsup

sorry i know im not involved in this but seriously who gives a fu.. get a life.

he doesn't how to spell, neither does he. I mean how old are you. 12. No one cares pal

Loser

I wondered when you would raise your ugly little head.

Tell me what was "he doesn't how to spell, neither does he." meant to mean?

At least we can understand what Jack is saying.

You, however, are an illiterate nasty little turd.

Go away.

 :sleep