Author Topic: We Need Malthouse  (Read 10742 times)

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #45 on: June 03, 2009, 03:38:44 PM »
Were do I get my cool little icons from guys!  :thatsgold

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13334
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #46 on: June 03, 2009, 03:41:00 PM »
Were do I get my cool little icons from guys!  :thatsgold

Right here Stripes

http://www.freesmileys.org/



Thanks Cub  :thumbsup

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100509
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Tigers of old want Malthouse (Age)
« Reply #47 on: June 11, 2009, 05:29:30 AM »
Tigers of old want Malthouse
Dan Silkstone | June 11, 2009

GET Mick Malthouse.

That's the message yesterday from the legends of Richmond. Mal Brown and Tommy Hafey were star attractions at a function to promote the 50th birthday of the club's past players' association. Their thoughts, though, were on the future.

And football's conventional wisdom has certainly shifted in favour of youth.

Hafey yesterday raised half an eyebrow at this week's appointment of 31-year-old Jade Rawlings as interim coach.

"He's obviously impressed the people who have made that appointment, because I thought there was a few people who could have taken over," he said.

Though he pronounced Rawlings a "good fella", Hafey's preference for 2010 was clear.

"I'd go for Michael Malthouse of all the people likely to be available," he said.

"We need the best available. We've made so many mistakes in recent times. We've got to make certain we get this right."

Brown said the Tigers needed to be daring and go for an appointment that would excite the club's supporters.

"Take some risks," he said. "Richmond has become, over 29 years, the beige football club. It has done nothing colourful, nothing from left field, until they got Ben Cousins."

The Western Australian hard man described Rawlings as "a very fine young man", but added: "At the end of the day, Malthouse has coached Collingwood even better than he coached the Eagles, and if he's available the club have to sit down and work out where they are going."

Again bucking conventional wisdom, Hafey cautioned against a cleanout of senior players at year's end.

"I wouldn't think there would have to be massive changes," he said.

"The coach would need to see everybody, the new coach … before they start making decisions. I think some of them could be very, very useful."

Both wanted to see Matthew Richardson go on for another year.

"He is obviously our best player," Hafey said. "And I think he probably will be next year and the year after."

Brown, especially, was keen to see another year from Cousins, a player who he said "has pulverised opinion".

The Tiger pair's support for Malthouse reinforces the already stated views of another club legend — Kevin Bartlett — that the club should explore the possibility of bringing the dual premiership coach back to Punt Road.

Richmond has already appointed a subcommittee that will vet applicants for the coaching job using industry best practice.

Brown, rather more old-fashioned, suggested a simpler set of criteria.

"Has that coach played in a premiership? And has he coached premierships?" he said.

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/tigers-of-old-want-malthouse/2009/06/10/1244313187090.html

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8547
  • In Absentia
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #48 on: June 11, 2009, 08:50:37 AM »
For those who think Malthouse is too old, you just have to look at Wayne Bennett in the NRL.

A gun coach with the Broncos who now has St.George Illawarra on top of the table.

A good coach, is a good coach, no matter the age.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

bushranger

  • Guest
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #49 on: June 11, 2009, 09:04:01 AM »
Aand Bennet retiered for a short while but was talked back into making a comeback and hasn't looked back.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #50 on: June 11, 2009, 09:51:37 AM »
And you all mocked me when I started this thread...... ::). But what does a hick from WA know eh pffft!!!! :whistle
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8547
  • In Absentia
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #51 on: June 11, 2009, 10:17:42 AM »
Hafey is on SEN now again pushing Malthouse for the Tigers.

Also said footy hasn't changed much, the most important things are long, direct, accurate kicks into the forward line and running and carrying the ball.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #52 on: June 11, 2009, 10:31:20 AM »
There is no question that Malthouse has still got what it takes, no question at all. When I started this thread I began by mentioning the game against the Eagles and he has continued on from there. He has this uncanny knack to get injury plagued teams up as he has done with Collingwood minus Rocca, Medhurst, Didak and the likes. He brings in a player like idiot at the right time after a knee reco and he wins the rising star award.

He is a no nonsence coach and he really holds players accountable, if they dont play as a team then they are back in the seconds no matter who they are. What impresses me the most is that Collingwood and the eagles and the Bulldogs players played for the team and each other while and when he is at the helm.

I would love to see him back at the club provided the process has been followed of course.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #53 on: June 11, 2009, 11:03:30 AM »
i dont really care who coaches us

but this is what is important

our next coach must

1/ really wanna coach and love us - love the fricken jumper and what is stands 4
2/ have a clear direction and ability to get the best out of the group
3/ be here for the right reasons unlike terry!!!!
4/ demand command and receive respect

if the next coach has these 4 qualities, no matter who they are, they will succeeed at this club

bushranger

  • Guest
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #54 on: June 11, 2009, 11:26:25 AM »
i dont really care who coaches us

but this is what is important

our next coach must

1/ really wanna coach and love us - love the fricken jumper and what is stands 4
2/ have a clear direction and ability to get the best out of the group
3/ be here for the right reasons unlike terry!!!!
4/ demand command and receive respect

if the next coach has these 4 qualities, no matter who they are, they will succeeed at this club
I like what you have said.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #55 on: June 11, 2009, 11:28:14 AM »
And you all mocked me when I started this thread...... ::). But what does a hick from WA know eh pffft!!!! :whistle

 ;D Malthouse willnot be coaching Richmond next year, thats what you know now  ;D  :whistle

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #56 on: June 11, 2009, 12:12:13 PM »
And you all mocked me when I started this thread...... ::). But what does a hick from WA know eh pffft!!!! :whistle

 ;D Malthouse willnot be coaching Richmond next year, thats what you know now  ;D  :whistle

I did not say he would be coaching I said we need him as coach...stuff me???? Another supposed source we will never know about, why the hell would Collingwood let him go anyway he is too valuable.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #57 on: June 11, 2009, 12:52:04 PM »
If Collingwood sign up Malthouse then Buckley will look elsewhere. All very interesting! My preferece would be to have Buckley but would be happy enough with Malthouse.

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8547
  • In Absentia
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #58 on: June 11, 2009, 01:04:43 PM »
If Collingwood sign up Malthouse then Buckley will look elsewhere. All very interesting! My preferece would be to have Buckley but would be happy enough with Malthouse.

There are some linking Buckley to North Melbourne because of the A'Rocca connection.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4906
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #59 on: June 11, 2009, 01:27:03 PM »
I was excited over the prospect of Mick comming to tigerland but with Collingwood surging towards the top 4 its not looking good.

The million dollar question remains.....Does Bucks have the courage to take on the Richmond challenge.
Unleash the tornado