Author Topic: We Need Malthouse  (Read 10752 times)

1965

  • Guest
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #60 on: June 11, 2009, 01:34:08 PM »
I was excited over the prospect of Mick comming to tigerland but with Collingwood surging towards the top 4 its not looking good.

The million dollar question remains.....Does Bucks have the courage to take on the Richmond challenge.

Depends on whether we can show a little passion during the second half of the year.

I don't think the list is as bad as the darksiders think. We could be in for far more positive time.

 :cheers

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #61 on: June 11, 2009, 05:43:25 PM »
A Sheedy Hird combo is not out of the question Ive been told. Its a small chance, but its not out of the question.

1965

  • Guest
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #62 on: June 11, 2009, 05:45:21 PM »
A Sheedy Hird combo is not out of the question Ive been told. Its a small chance, but its not out of the question.

I could live with a Hird - Sheedy combo. Hird as senior coach and Sheeds as mentor.

 :thumbsup


Offline tigerfan1961

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #63 on: June 11, 2009, 06:40:53 PM »
If Collingwood sign up Malthouse then Buckley will look elsewhere. All very interesting! My preferece would be to have Buckley but would be happy enough with Malthouse.
I had been thinking the same thing until I heard Damian Hardwick speak on Sport927 this morning. Very very impressive bloke and would do very well wherever he took the reins. Also heard through someone in the know at Essendon that he was the leading candidate going into the last round of their search for a coach- Knighter pipped him only due to superior knowledge of the Bombers list.

Hardwick or Buckley for me, but I now lean towards Hardwick after hearing his interview this morning.

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #64 on: June 11, 2009, 08:11:17 PM »
If Collingwood sign up Malthouse then Buckley will look elsewhere. All very interesting! My preferece would be to have Buckley but would be happy enough with Malthouse.
I had been thinking the same thing until I heard Damian Hardwick speak on Sport927 this morning. Very very impressive bloke and would do very well wherever he took the reins. Also heard through someone in the know at Essendon that he was the leading candidate going into the last round of their search for a coach- Knighter pipped him only due to superior knowledge of the Bombers list.

Hardwick or Buckley for me, but I now lean towards Hardwick after hearing his interview this morning.

Its great to have Quality options, whoever we get they must not suffer the media , knee jerk fans or except excuses from players who are sub par. They also need to take advantage of the grace period and build for the future the first and second year.

I take my hat off to the Richmond leadership this week (selection table) as its sends the message some of us were hoping and praying for.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100509
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #65 on: July 09, 2009, 05:52:20 PM »
Ch 10 news just showed Browny this morning on tv saying Malthouse would be a great get if he came over to Richmond to coach. We'd welcome him with open arms.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59486
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #66 on: July 09, 2009, 07:26:31 PM »
Ch 10 news just showed Browny this morning on tv saying Malthouse would be a great get if he came over to Richmond to coach. We'd welcome him with open arms.
But Malthouse is most likely to remain at Collingwood after 6 straight wins Browny  ???  :wallywink. We really need to get everyone associated with the club into one room and tell them to shut up  :scream.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8547
  • In Absentia
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #67 on: July 09, 2009, 08:18:36 PM »
Magpie plot thickens

COLLINGWOOD has won six games in a row under Michael Malthouse for the first time since 2003 and still his future is clouded.

Imagine the situation had Collingwood lost six in a row.

There would be hourly updates on radio, daily bulletins in the papers, marching in the streets, armed guards at Lexus Centre.

The Magpies, though, are fourth, the coach wants to continue to coach, and, clearly, he is at the top of his game.

What, then, is the hold-up, and is there a risk the club might end up with egg on its face?

Will Malthouse continue to coach Collingwood in his own right next year?

Could he be directed to do the job with Nathan Buckley as his right-hand man and heir apparent?

Or, might he yet end up at Punt Rd, for Richmond’s interest could be more meaningful than many suspect?

It is a highly intriguing situation.

..................

While Malthouse has said publicly he’s not fussed and won’t think about the future until his contract expires later this year, he must be more than a little irritated.

Given the delay, it would be no surprise to find Richmond making discreet inquiries.

If Malthouse were to suspect he had no more than 12 months ahead of him at Collingwood, four years at one of the clubs he represented as a player would have to appeal.

Surely he would appeal to them. He is 55 (56 in August), vastly experienced, still passionate and implements the best rotation system in the competition.

It is a bizarre situation. As it is at the Western Bulldogs, with Rodney Eade still uncontracted for next year.

There has to be movement soon. In both camps.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/mikesheahan/index.php/heraldsun/comments/magpie_plot_thickens/
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100509
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #68 on: July 12, 2009, 11:53:40 AM »
Crawf said with Malthouse not re-signed yet Richmond should go straight to him now and offer him a 3-4 year deal to come to Punt Rd.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #69 on: July 12, 2009, 12:40:10 PM »
Crawf said with Malthouse not re-signed yet Richmond should go straight to him now and offer him a 3-4 year deal to come to Punt Rd.

I agree with Crawford IMHO the only coach that would make 99% of the supporters happy is Malthouse. Anybody else and therell be a section of the club that wont support as much as they should and we need everyone behind the new coach.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #70 on: July 12, 2009, 08:28:19 PM »
Rumor is on BF that Micks management met with Richmond Friday, so would we sign him straight away if we had the chance or put him through the process?? I would just sign him as he won't be bothered with the process IMO.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #71 on: July 12, 2009, 09:52:37 PM »
I'm still not 100% convinced on Malthouse, his premierships were 15 YEARS ago
Now he's at the best resourced club in the game for almost a decade and hasn't been able to win anything

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #72 on: July 12, 2009, 09:55:29 PM »
I'm still not 100% convinced on Malthouse, his premierships were 15 YEARS ago
Now he's at the best resourced club in the game for almost a decade and hasn't been able to win anything

I just love the way he can get that team of his up every week, even when they have a heap of injuries he seems to pull something out of the hat and they win.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #73 on: July 12, 2009, 09:59:15 PM »
I'm still not 100% convinced on Malthouse, his premierships were 15 YEARS ago
Now he's at the best resourced club in the game for almost a decade and hasn't been able to win anything

I just love the way he can get that team of his up every week, even when they have a heap of injuries he seems to pull something out of the hat and they win.
He certainly seems able to get them to make up the numbers every year, however they've been treading water for a while now

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: We Need Malthouse
« Reply #74 on: July 12, 2009, 10:18:43 PM »
The problem with Malthouse is that he is too good. He gets the best out of any side he coaches and unfortunately for him that is only the finals with the list he currently has. This of course means that he has never taken a team to the bottom of the ladder for any extended period which is necessary for any club to rebuild a strong enough side to win a flag.

If Malthouse came to Richmond he would have the raw talent to turn into a premiership side and get the absolute best out of all our list.

In saying this though, we shouldn't take him unless he goes through the process (at least some of it) the same as anyone else.

Stripes