Average. Made a couple of mistakes and cost us a goal by getting caught once. Didn't have anywhere near as many spoils as Post did. Wasn't bad but IMO he was average. Post was definitely better
Yeah, reason I asked was that they both had almost identical stats across the board from the game, the only thing Post did significantly better in was 1%ers which would be as you called it - the spoiling. I didn't notice his spoiling that much apart from 1 very good spoil and a couple of regulation ones but I'm not disagreeing it was a strong point. I'm only basing my opinion on his actual output and still can't change my mind that his game was average, not good or bad, just like I believe Moore's was. Was it better than most of his previous efforts? Yes it was, and do I hope he continues on that vein? Absolutely, but at the end of the day he put out what he put out, an improved average game. All IMHO of course.
