Jayden Post [merged]

[MADTIGER2010]

Rance looks shocking next to post because he's trying to cover him as well as his  own opponent

Excellent point. Anyone who watches the game live would notice how often Post is off his opponent. Loper.

Yeah cos he has to man up rances player, cos rance ran off him. Post has covered for Rance a bit too lately. Rance has struggled against the big forwards eg. Pav, Petrie, Walker. Has nothing to do with Post

[WA Tiger]

Poorly coached ...anyone.....

He has obviously been given a job to do...he either cant do it or he is useless....work it out.

[tigercub2012]

You need a drink of holy water
You have missed the point on why Rance is under the pump
Sorry mrs post goal post cameras are being named after your son
What does this tell the rest of the footy world
That Jayden lacks focus and clarity, full of indecision and could be scrapped in the future

[Loui Tufga]

Nobody seems to notice either that Rance is the only True backman we have out here at the moment. Give e guy a break, he is busting his arse with absolutely no support around him! Get back Grimes and add another pure backman and the heat is taken off he one man back line we haven't the moment. We all seem to forget how well Rance was going earlier his year with Grimes in the side....

[Gigantor]

As the season has progressed many of us have started to see the limitations of players like Houli,who can only play one side of his body and seems to lack a ticker.Now at the moment there is nobdody that can step up and fill that role ,so he gets a game.Newman is another one that worries me .we seem to be getting only occasional shows of his old self.
Grimes coming back will be a huge boost to our backline,but with his on going hamstrings problem his long term viability must come into question.
In yetserdays game the penny actually dropped for me on Edwards.we cant possibly play him in any midfield role he just butchers the ball way to often.His role should be purely as a goal sneak inside the 50 metre arc(if indeed a player can be limited to that)

[bojangles17]

Early on he was like he rock of gibraltor....lord knows why he wasnt tried forward....fair dinkum ive seenmore creativity in a kindergarten class than our coaching box

[cub]

Dermie summed him up, has flaws but there is 'something' to work with!

[Big Papa Bear]

Jayden - just hit someone please - hard. If you cannot punch the ball at least punch the back of the forward's head!

[TigerTimeII]

post will be ok, i see a future in him, just needs to be coached better

[Big Papa Bear]

For a big player his is soft - needs to muscle up and start impacting packs and denting opposition. Cannot remember the last time he went in hard or got hurt putting his body on the line

[tigercub2012]

all true but where next?we cant get rid of the whole team
we need to start looking at the guys that have been there for more than 6yrs first plus band aid recruits
and ask the question will these guys be able to  help win us a flag????
newman
jackson
edwards
nahas
mcguane
houli
griggs

also delist graham derrickx browneye  a-maric and whatever you want add on the end

[dwaino]

8 posts on the field are enough.

[the claw]

Rance looks shocking next to post because he's trying to cover him as well as his  own opponent

Excellent point. Anyone who watches the game live would notice how often Post is off his opponent. Loper.

was there this week and rance was diabolical compared to post. i dont think ive ever seen a bloke misjudge the ball so poorly  and so much in the air as rance does. for a key defender that is unforgivable.
if anyone plays of his man too much its rance  poor in the air falls over one on one too often and too often misses targets with his kicking and is often caught out of position.

post has his issues too. decision making confidence and pace are real issues. attack on the ball or intensity are also issues.

agree with madone in one regard we should have been playing post a bit more instead of giving blokes like mcguane and thursield games.

the real difference between rance vickery griffiths  and post is the others  were  constantly given games early on regardless of form. post was not given that luxury and in a lot of ways has been the scape goat for losses. one game in one loss one poor performance out he goes. always been a believer of if you are gonna play em give em good game time and give a decent block of games. i also believe post has been pulled from pillar to post positionally. to me this kid was a chb yet we have thrown him forward then back then forward and back again. theres been no consistency in any area for him.

dunno if hes gunna make it or not he has some good attributes but he also has some glareing deficiencies. one thing i do know we would be better off keeping him than retaining the likes of mcguane who we know for certain to be below standard  and has had nearly 90  100 games

dont see how people can criticise one and not the other. for what its worth thought post was decent this week despite the customary mistakes.

[MADTIGER2010]

Rance looks shocking next to post because he's trying to cover him as well as his  own opponent

Excellent point. Anyone who watches the game live would notice how often Post is off his opponent. Loper.

was there this week and rance was diabolical compared to post. i dont think ive ever seen a bloke misjudge the ball so poorly  and so much in the air as rance does. for a key defender that is unforgivable.
if anyone plays of his man too much its rance  poor in the air falls over one on one too often and too often misses targets with his kicking and is often caught out of position.

post has his issues too. decision making confidence and pace are real issues. attack on the ball or intensity are also issues.

agree with madone in one regard we should have been playing post a bit more instead of giving blokes like mcguane and thursield games.

the real difference between rance vickery griffiths  and post is the others  were  constantly given games early on regardless of form. post was not given that luxury and in a lot of ways has been the scape goat for losses. one game in one loss one poor performance out he goes. always been a believer of if you are gonna play em give em good game time and give a decent block of games. i also believe post has been pulled from pillar to post positionally. to me this kid was a chb yet we have thrown him forward then back then forward and back again. theres been no consistency in any area for him.

dunno if hes gunna make it or not he has some good attributes but he also has some glareing deficiencies. one thing i do know we would be better off keeping him than retaining the likes of mcguane who we know for certain to be below standard  and has had nearly 90  100 games

dont see how people can criticise one and not the other. for what its worth thought post was decent this week despite the customary mistakes.

Post is reasonable with hands under pressure. Can get the handball out in a pack. If he stops kicking off one step he'll cut out the miskicks. More gametime should give him more confidence with the ball when he isn't under pressure. He's in the perfect position to develop from now on. I'd be shocked if the club didn't have every intention to develop him further in 2013. He's 22, 195cm and about 95kg. Between 30 and 50 games is exactly when he should take that step. That is 2013. Delisting/Trade should be the furthest thing from the clubs thoughts.

[the claw]

Rance looks shocking next to post because he's trying to cover him as well as his  own opponent

Excellent point. Anyone who watches the game live would notice how often Post is off his opponent. Loper.

was there this week and rance was diabolical compared to post. i dont think ive ever seen a bloke misjudge the ball so poorly  and so much in the air as rance does. for a key defender that is unforgivable.
if anyone plays of his man too much its rance  poor in the air falls over one on one too often and too often misses targets with his kicking and is often caught out of position.

post has his issues too. decision making confidence and pace are real issues. attack on the ball or intensity are also issues.

agree with madone in one regard we should have been playing post a bit more instead of giving blokes like mcguane and thursield games.

the real difference between rance vickery griffiths  and post is the others  were  constantly given games early on regardless of form. post was not given that luxury and in a lot of ways has been the scape goat for losses. one game in one loss one poor performance out he goes. always been a believer of if you are gonna play em give em good game time and give a decent block of games. i also believe post has been pulled from pillar to post positionally. to me this kid was a chb yet we have thrown him forward then back then forward and back again. theres been no consistency in any area for him.

dunno if hes gunna make it or not he has some good attributes but he also has some glareing deficiencies. one thing i do know we would be better off keeping him than retaining the likes of mcguane who we know for certain to be below standard  and has had nearly 90  100 games

dont see how people can criticise one and not the other. for what its worth thought post was decent this week despite the customary mistakes.

Post is reasonable with hands under pressure. Can get the handball out in a pack. If he stops kicking off one step he'll cut out the miskicks. More gametime should give him more confidence with the ball when he isn't under pressure. He's in the perfect position to develop from now on. I'd be shocked if the club didn't have every intention to develop him further in 2013. He's 22, 195cm and about 95kg. Between 30 and 50 games is exactly when he should take that step. That is 2013. Delisting/Trade should be the furthest thing from the clubs thoughts.

he needs to improve a fair bit but he should be given another yr. the ball is in his court. for post the mantra is now improve or perish.
i see a lot of similarities with post and what has transpired to  schoenmakers.