Author Topic: Jayden Post [merged]  (Read 38865 times)

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #465 on: August 26, 2012, 12:27:24 AM »


he is better than rance

You've got to kidding. Rance is a far better player. The one thing you are guaranteed with Rance is he won't shirk a contest

I thought Post did sme good things last night but his decision making and slow reaction time again shone like a beacon during the game

Personally I think he will be put up for trade and any other club with a young list and a lack of bigger body types will be interested and if that means a 2nd rounder or early 3rd round from a GWS, GC, Edoms etc then I'd take it a heartbeat.

lets talk this time next yr , rance may not even be in the team

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #466 on: August 26, 2012, 12:30:43 AM »


he is better than rance

You've got to kidding. Rance is a far better player. The one thing you are guaranteed with Rance is he won't shirk a contest

I thought Post did sme good things last night but his decision making and slow reaction time again shone like a beacon during the game

Personally I think he will be put up for trade and any other club with a young list and a lack of bigger body types will be interested and if that means a 2nd rounder or early 3rd round from a GWS, GC, Edoms etc then I'd take it a heartbeat.

lets talk this time next yr , rance may not even be in the team

Unless he has a season ending injury there will be no way he won't be in the side....Fact.

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #467 on: August 26, 2012, 09:54:20 AM »
He's a dud. Kicking is horrible. Handballing is horrible. Trade or Delist.

Would rather Mcguane stay in for another year than this muppet.

You couldn't get any dumber could you?

He takes a good mark but his disposal is rubbish. Are you related to him or something? Trade while we can. Won't make it.

Kicks well on both feet.

rubbish.

You still negative from the last 30 years? Blind as anything

He's crap man. Get over it. When he makes it you can bump this thread.

You still think he can't kick. 2 bad kicks in 6 weeks. Both off 1 step. They are kicks of a nervous player trying to cement his spot. If the club didn't stuff him around for 12 games at Coburg he'd be playing confident footy by now. Instead of giving miller games. Derrickx and griffiths didn't do any better at Coburg. Post should have been given first opportunity considering he has been here nearly 4 years. Anyway, injury has given him the overdue opportunity and apart from the occasional nervous handball he is looking very good. We should be excited we have post, griffiths, grimes, rance and Vickery. All big talents for the future. But nah delist lol

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #468 on: August 26, 2012, 10:01:08 AM »
Many forget that since Grimesy went down ,Rance has shouldered the big man responsibilities more or less on his own ,with what i would call cameo roles by Post and Griff. i think if grimes comes back fully recovered and if we get chaplain,then it becomes a battle of 3 (Post,Griff,and chaplain) for the other spot.I guess Post being the current incumbent would get first crack at it

Offline tigtuff12

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #469 on: August 26, 2012, 10:15:37 AM »
def looked better on Friday - hopefully being able to string a few games together will do his confidence the world of good (as opposed to the previous "one in, five out" run he was getting...

could see him being used for trade bait but wouldn't be upset if he stayed (especially after the time we've invested) & knowing our luck would probably turn into another Schultz if he did go & wind up flourishing at another club......

what's overall consensus?  keep or trade?  if trade what do you think he's LEGITIMATE currency is?
...the fighting fury...

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #470 on: August 26, 2012, 10:50:44 AM »
Im pretty sure we'll struggle to hold onto posty with rival clubs likely to offer him long term deals and it wouldnt surprise if he considered there be better opportunities elsewhere... A second rounder beckons :shh

The retirements of Moore and miller will help him. Dont be surprised if derrickx us let go too. He should get regular games from now on considering we'll use 3 talls forwards and 3 tall backs in most games. Griffiths, Vickery and Reiwoldt forward and rance, grimes and post back. With astbury, Elton and mcguane as back up. Do we really need chaplain? All he does is turn the ball over and he'll be 27 soon. Our young talls only need to put on 4 kilos to be as big
yes we need a player like chaplain desperately. he wpold be starting 22 quite easily a big upgrade on anything we have. we also dont have depth down back, or anywhere for that matter.
riewoldt, vickery, griffiths,elton, and astbury are all forwards. it leaves defenders  mcguane who should be delisted grimes coming of another injury, rance who has his problems playing deep, post who while giving another yr to has done little to date and still has serious question marks over him.

this draft i would be targeting
4 tall defenders  chaplain fa, lee nd50 , hartigan mature  rookie,  tanner smith nd 35.
5 mids  10, 29, 64,mature  psd, one or two rookies.
2 sml/med forwards   duffy nd, rookie
1 ruckman either mature or kid rookie.
1 key forward lee who can play either end.

thats a total of 12 picks 7 or 8 list proper and 4 or 5 rookies.

your trouble madone is you are forever counting your chooks before they hatch let em hatch first and if you end up with an extra one or two trade em out for more good picks.

gone list proper.
moore, connors, maconald.
5 more to go from
browne, derickx, graham, mcguane, white, post tuck and newman all uncontracted. you would think post tuck and newman are safe.

rookies gone
heslin, miller
two more to go from
maric, wright, verrier,

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #471 on: August 26, 2012, 01:26:50 PM »
Im pretty sure we'll struggle to hold onto posty with rival clubs likely to offer him long term deals and it wouldnt surprise if he considered there be better opportunities elsewhere... A second rounder beckons :shh

The retirements of Moore and miller will help him. Dont be surprised if derrickx us let go too. He should get regular games from now on considering we'll use 3 talls forwards and 3 tall backs in most games. Griffiths, Vickery and Reiwoldt forward and rance, grimes and post back. With astbury, Elton and mcguane as back up. Do we really need chaplain? All he does is turn the ball over and he'll be 27 soon. Our young talls only need to put on 4 kilos to be as big
yes we need a player like chaplain desperately. he wpold be starting 22 quite easily a big upgrade on anything we have. we also dont have depth down back, or anywhere for that matter.
riewoldt, vickery, griffiths,elton, and astbury are all forwards. it leaves defenders  mcguane who should be delisted grimes coming of another injury, rance who has his problems playing deep, post who while giving another yr to has done little to date and still has serious question marks over him.

this draft i would be targeting
4 tall defenders  chaplain fa, lee nd50 , hartigan mature  rookie,  tanner smith nd 35.
5 mids  10, 29, 64,mature  psd, one or two rookies.
2 sml/med forwards   duffy nd, rookie
1 ruckman either mature or kid rookie.
1 key forward lee who can play either end.

thats a total of 12 picks 7 or 8 list proper and 4 or 5 rookies.

your trouble madone is you are forever counting your chooks before they hatch let em hatch first and if you end up with an extra one or two trade em out for more good picks.

gone list proper.
moore, connors, maconald.
5 more to go from
browne, derickx, graham, mcguane, white, post tuck and newman all uncontracted. you would think post tuck and newman are safe.

rookies gone
heslin, miller
two more to go from
maric, wright, verrier,

The fact you have us drafting 12 players shows you react way too much. No way we need to draft 4 talls in defence. We need to draft 2 midfielders, a ruck man, a key tall and 2 wing/flank types. I wouldn't be getting rid of Browne. Can't prove himself if he doesn't get a game with Maric playing. We will only get rid of another 4 players and will only have about 6 senior draft picks at most. Miller, Moore, macdonald, Connors and heslin are gone. Graham, webberley, Maric and derrickx will probably be the only ones who will go now

Offline unplugged

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #472 on: August 26, 2012, 01:42:39 PM »
Post is looking better every week.  He is a big unit.  Considering how many games we put into Rance before he was competitive and still the silly mistakes he makes on a consistent basis.  We need to give Post some time to develop.  Post has the potential to be a very solid CHB.  They really need to get as many games into as they can.  The lack of opportunities he has had has been disturbing given the rides some of the other players have had on this list.

Regarding Browne.  Delist.  No room in the AFL for slow giants.  Natanui is the model we should be looking for.  Tall and mobile.

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #473 on: August 26, 2012, 01:52:00 PM »
Im pretty sure we'll struggle to hold onto posty with rival clubs likely to offer him long term deals and it wouldnt surprise if he considered there be better opportunities elsewhere... A second rounder beckons :shh

The retirements of Moore and miller will help him. Dont be surprised if derrickx us let go too. He should get regular games from now on considering we'll use 3 talls forwards and 3 tall backs in most games. Griffiths, Vickery and Reiwoldt forward and rance, grimes and post back. With astbury, Elton and mcguane as back up. Do we really need chaplain? All he does is turn the ball over and he'll be 27 soon. Our young talls only need to put on 4 kilos to be as big
yes we need a player like chaplain desperately. he wpold be starting 22 quite easily a big upgrade on anything we have. we also dont have depth down back, or anywhere for that matter.
riewoldt, vickery, griffiths,elton, and astbury are all forwards. it leaves defenders  mcguane who should be delisted grimes coming of another injury, rance who has his problems playing deep, post who while giving another yr to has done little to date and still has serious question marks over him.

this draft i would be targeting
4 tall defenders  chaplain fa, lee nd50 , hartigan mature  rookie,  tanner smith nd 35.
5 mids  10, 29, 64,mature  psd, one or two rookies.
2 sml/med forwards   duffy nd, rookie
1 ruckman either mature or kid rookie.
1 key forward lee who can play either end.

thats a total of 12 picks 7 or 8 list proper and 4 or 5 rookies.

your trouble madone is you are forever counting your chooks before they hatch let em hatch first and if you end up with an extra one or two trade em out for more good picks.

gone list proper.
moore, connors, maconald.
5 more to go from
browne, derickx, graham, mcguane, white, post tuck and newman all uncontracted. you would think post tuck and newman are safe.

rookies gone
heslin, miller
two more to go from
maric, wright, verrier,

The fact you have us drafting 12 players shows you react way too much. No way we need to draft 4 talls in defence. We need to draft 2 midfielders, a ruck man, a key tall and 2 wing/flank types. I wouldn't be getting rid of Browne. Can't prove himself if he doesn't get a game with Maric playing. We will only get rid of another 4 players and will only have about 6 senior draft picks at most. Miller, Moore, macdonald, Connors and heslin are gone. Graham, webberley, Maric and derrickx will probably be the only ones who will go now

I agree with The Craw, there will be 10 to 12 changes on our list this year including trades and rookies

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8097
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #474 on: August 26, 2012, 02:42:11 PM »
Get a room fun boys
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #475 on: August 26, 2012, 02:49:17 PM »
Browne.
Geez,don't even mention him please.
It's an embarrassment to the club that they have persisted with
stuffen witches hat.

Moving right along.....

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #476 on: August 26, 2012, 02:56:24 PM »
Im pretty sure we'll struggle to hold onto posty with rival clubs likely to offer him long term deals and it wouldnt surprise if he considered there be better opportunities elsewhere... A second rounder beckons :shh

The retirements of Moore and miller will help him. Dont be surprised if derrickx us let go too. He should get regular games from now on considering we'll use 3 talls forwards and 3 tall backs in most games. Griffiths, Vickery and Reiwoldt forward and rance, grimes and post back. With astbury, Elton and mcguane as back up. Do we really need chaplain? All he does is turn the ball over and he'll be 27 soon. Our young talls only need to put on 4 kilos to be as big
yes we need a player like chaplain desperately. he wpold be starting 22 quite easily a big upgrade on anything we have. we also dont have depth down back, or anywhere for that matter.
riewoldt, vickery, griffiths,elton, and astbury are all forwards. it leaves defenders  mcguane who should be delisted grimes coming of another injury, rance who has his problems playing deep, post who while giving another yr to has done little to date and still has serious question marks over him.

this draft i would be targeting
4 tall defenders  chaplain fa, lee nd50 , hartigan mature  rookie,  tanner smith nd 35.
5 mids  10, 29, 64,mature  psd, one or two rookies.
2 sml/med forwards   duffy nd, rookie
1 ruckman either mature or kid rookie.
1 key forward lee who can play either end.

thats a total of 12 picks 7 or 8 list proper and 4 or 5 rookies.

your trouble madone is you are forever counting your chooks before they hatch let em hatch first and if you end up with an extra one or two trade em out for more good picks.

gone list proper.
moore, connors, maconald.
5 more to go from
browne, derickx, graham, mcguane, white, post tuck and newman all uncontracted. you would think post tuck and newman are safe.

rookies gone
heslin, miller
two more to go from
maric, wright, verrier,

The fact you have us drafting 12 players shows you react way too much. No way we need to draft 4 talls in defence. We need to draft 2 midfielders, a ruck man, a key tall and 2 wing/flank types. I wouldn't be getting rid of Browne. Can't prove himself if he doesn't get a game with Maric playing. We will only get rid of another 4 players and will only have about 6 senior draft picks at most. Miller, Moore, macdonald, Connors and heslin are gone. Graham, webberley, Maric and derrickx will probably be the only ones who will go now

ooh dear
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3811
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #477 on: August 26, 2012, 03:12:09 PM »
Browne must go

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40317
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #478 on: August 26, 2012, 04:03:02 PM »


he is better than rance

You've got to kidding. Rance is a far better player. The one thing you are guaranteed with Rance is he won't shirk a contest

I thought Post did sme good things last night but his decision making and slow reaction time again shone like a beacon during the game

Personally I think he will be put up for trade and any other club with a young list and a lack of bigger body types will be interested and if that means a 2nd rounder or early 3rd round from a GWS, GC, Edoms etc then I'd take it a heartbeat.

lets talk this time next yr , rance may not even be in the team

Don't think we need to wait until next year, think we can chat about it in around 10 weeks, after trade time because there's a good chance that Post won't even be at the club  ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Jayden Post [merged]
« Reply #479 on: August 26, 2012, 04:22:52 PM »

Don't think we need to wait until next year, think we can chat about it in around 10 weeks, after trade time because there's a good chance that Post won't even be at the club  ;D

We can only pray.   :pray