2009 AFL Draft

[one-eyed]

Trengove got 20 possies in Sturt's loss to Central Districts in the SANFL GF yesterday.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26164136-5013406,00.html

[one-eyed]

The AFL site has a two part video summary of the top draftees at the draft camp.


Trengove, Scully, Talia, Butcher, Jetta, Gysbert, Long, Sheppard and Martin in part one. Shows footage of RFC officials shaking hands with Scully.

http://www.afl.com.au/Video/tabid/76/videoid/50705/draft+camp+review+pt+1/Default.aspx#VideoPlayerB

Morabito, Lucas, Moore, Black, Craig, Grimes, Cunnington, Bastinac and Rohan in part two.

http://www.afl.com.au/Video/tabid/76/videoid/50705/draft+camp+review+pt+2/Default.aspx#VideoPlayerB

[1965]

Sorry about the last post but I am using the iPhone. Looks like he doesn't even have faith in his kicking. Get Martin for Gods sake!!!!!

Work want to upgrade my Palm Treo to an iPhone.

How do you find yours?

Really love It mate best phone I have ever had. Sorry to derail thread mods!!

Just got the iPhone.

It truly is a brilliant piece of technology.

 

[torch]

how many rounds are in the draft?

five?

 

[WA Tiger]

Sorry about the last post but I am using the iPhone. Looks like he doesn't even have faith in his kicking. Get Martin for Gods sake!!!!!

Work want to upgrade my Palm Treo to an iPhone.

How do you find yours?

Really love It mate best phone I have ever had. Sorry to derail thread mods!!

Just got the iPhone.

It truly is a brilliant piece of technology.

 

Excellent well done you won't be sorry!!!!

[tigersalive]

how many rounds are in the draft?

five?

 

How longs a piece of string? 

[Infamy]

how many rounds are in the draft?

five?

 

How longs a piece of string? 

Twice the distance from the middle to the end

[torch]

so Five?

 

[one-eyed]

Sydney yesterday attempted to get its hands on Richmond's pick No. 3 - and midfielder Dustin Martin - by offering its first two choices in the upcoming draft, numbers six and 14, to the Tigers. The idea was swiftly knocked back by Richmond, which is believed to be keen on the Bendigo onballer.

Sydney is also believed to be interested in Geelong Falcons tough nut Ben Cunnington, although the same deal wasn't offered to Fremantle, suggesting Martin was their target. Neither he nor Cunnington is expected to last past pick five in the draft.

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/swans-generous-offer-for-young-cat/2009/10/08/1254701105359.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

[Chuck17]

Sydney yesterday attempted to get its hands on Richmond's pick No. 3 - and midfielder Dustin Martin - by offering its first two choices in the upcoming draft, numbers six and 14, to the Tigers. The idea was swiftly knocked back by Richmond, which is believed to be keen on the Bendigo onballer.

I thought they may have wanted Butcher as they badly need KPF's unless they get their hands on the money box grabber FEV.  However by the sounds of it Butcher may last to 6 anyway.

If they did want Martin then I am gald we knocked them back because that should be a good endorsement of how good Martin is/will be.

[wayne]

Sydney yesterday attempted to get its hands on Richmond's pick No. 3 - and midfielder Dustin Martin - by offering its first two choices in the upcoming draft, numbers six and 14, to the Tigers. The idea was swiftly knocked back by Richmond, which is believed to be keen on the Bendigo onballer.

They'd have to have approached the Demons as well with the same offer. Maybe 6 + 14 and a player for pick 2.

If the Dee's took it, then we get either Martin or Trengove anyway. Do it Dee's!!
 

[wayne]

What we need to try and do today is to shuffle our picks forward.

Pick 51 and Patto for 46 (Hawks)
Tuck and 35 for 28 (Swans)
McMahon (and half his salary) and 44 for 32 (Saints)
  Schulz and 19 for Farmer and 16 (Port) 

Leaves us with

3, 16, 28, 32, 44, 46

[FooffooValve]

So,we have 3, 19, 35, 44, 51, 67, 72, 83 + PSD 2. Is that right?

Maybe we are intending to use 7 ND and the PSD pick.

[Stripes]

So,we have 3, 19, 35, 44, 51, 67, 72, 83 + PSD 2. Is that right?

Maybe we are intending to use 7 ND and the PSD pick.

I don't think so. I think we will elevate Nahas at the very least and possibly Browne and even Silvester which would mean we would stop at pick 51 or 67 if we got rid of Silvester instead of elevating him. I just can't see us making selections that far into the draft given it is by all reports very shallow.

Stripes

[FooffooValve]

Just speculating Stripes, as it would seem a bit pointless to get pick 72 from Port if we weren't going to use it. Perhaps it is just insurance in case a kid that we have our eye on is still there at 72.