Author Topic: Toby Nankervis [merged]  (Read 179972 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #150 on: October 21, 2016, 12:16:36 AM »
I like riddles
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7011
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #151 on: October 21, 2016, 12:06:19 PM »
The riddle of the sphinxta
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #152 on: October 21, 2016, 06:36:41 PM »

Grimes is soft  :lol

Grimes is far from soft

Agreed - ridiculous thing to say. Puts his body on the line every week.
It was only a joke mate, at Claws expense.
Grimes is one of my favourites and one of the bravest at the club.
But as soft as butter im happy to cop the ridicule as usual. but you are not watching close enough if you think he aint soft.A bit like Ellis actually courageous in some ways as soft as they come in others.
Edwards another who totally escapes criticism for being as soft and weak as they come for different reasons. For what ever reason we have too many just like Grimes.
Comparing anyone to Bellis when it comes to being soft and scared is just not footy.
Anyway....
I recon Grimes is extremely underrated when it comes to our structures. He plays on the comps dangerous small forwards put can quite easily play on the agile bigger guys like Darling.
These types are so valuable in today's footy.
We would be stuffed without Rance and Grimes.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7609
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #153 on: October 21, 2016, 11:16:27 PM »

Grimes is soft  :lol

Grimes is far from soft

Agreed - ridiculous thing to say. Puts his body on the line every week.
It was only a joke mate, at Claws expense.
Grimes is one of my favourites and one of the bravest at the club.
But as soft as butter im happy to cop the ridicule as usual. but you are not watching close enough if you think he aint soft.A bit like Ellis actually courageous in some ways as soft as they come in others.
Edwards another who totally escapes criticism for being as soft and weak as they come for different reasons. For what ever reason we have too many just like Grimes.

The only thing you are watching is your todger as you jerk it mercilessly back and forth while posting on the forum.
If you watched closely, you'd be happy with Grimes as a 3rd defender.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #154 on: October 21, 2016, 11:18:01 PM »
no he wouldn't!


That's Rance's job......
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #155 on: October 22, 2016, 09:11:09 PM »
Think this guy will surprise us. He is going to be heaps better than Vickery as a ruck forward.

Continues the tradition of Tassie boys at Richmond too.

Best quality is one I would like to see in more of our players: absolutely HATES losing.  :clapping
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5012
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #156 on: October 23, 2016, 11:00:26 AM »
I'm excited about Nank the Tank. He'll be a good addition I reckon.

Although, I said that about Townsend....

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7609
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #157 on: October 23, 2016, 11:05:44 AM »
I have this uneasy feeling that he will shank easy set shots from 30 metres out.
Apart from that, reckon he gives us the grunt we've been lacking in the ruck.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3907
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #158 on: October 23, 2016, 01:00:55 PM »
So what did we get here. Well so far a very below standard AFL player. We certainly did not trade for him based on performances at the top level. But hey that is based on just 12 games in his first three years.
I for one have not seen a lot of this bloke but for a young ruckman he seemed to be tracking along okay. Statistically it is not great reading but again he has played just 12 games.His form away from AFL  has apparently been very good dominating at NEAFL but one has to be careful when looking at what he may be playing against down there.
Disposals - 10
Tackles - 4.6
MKS - 1.7
c/m - 0.5
Gls - 0.25
H/O - 11.7

As i said statistically at least it does not make for pretty reading but one has to factor in he has been  a junior ruckman who needs to development

I  see a physically ready player who can play if he is needed but he is a player who needs much development.
At 199cm and 106kg we have a Maric type or Mumford type imo he will be vulnerable against the spring heeled mobile  types.What he should bring for us is an extra big body at the contest when the ball hits the ground.

So far he has not taken  a lot of marks and hardly any contested onesand managed just 3 goals.  I am not sure he can become a goal kicking ruckman.Other concern is atm he has not won many H/O but that is neither here nor there atm as long as he gives a good contest.

Personally i think him a good get but i really hope there is patience shown with him. Imo  We have the  Maric replacement he just needs to develop and get to a good level.  We still dont have the Hampson replacement. Maybe we have him on the list already in Chol but Chol's size is a huge worry, until he gains the size and strength  he will take time to play in the role at AFL level.
Trouble is at some stage Chol will need to be  actually developed as a ruckman.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #159 on: October 23, 2016, 01:04:22 PM »
There is only (and will ever be) one Hampson Claw
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3907
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #160 on: October 23, 2016, 02:00:42 PM »
There is only (and will ever be) one Hampson Claw
LOL Unfortunately that is true.
Still it is a worry that based on recent form he is the best ruck option we have. In fairness to him i thought he was pretty servicable in a fair few games last yr definately need an upgrade but not as bad as most made him out to be.

Such a long record to judge him by yet we still went and got him god knows what they saw or were thinking.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #161 on: October 23, 2016, 11:45:57 PM »

I for one have not seen a lot of this bloke but for a young ruckman he seemed to be tracking along okay. Statistically it is not great reading but again he has played just 12 games.

Another positive is one of (if not the) best games he played was in the semi-final. Just good he didn't turn to pudding.

Oh and career high tackles = 9. Hampsons is 5 = 0.4 more than Nankervis' average :lol

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #162 on: October 23, 2016, 11:52:18 PM »
Oh the potential in this bloke.... :whistle :whistle :whistle
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #163 on: October 24, 2016, 12:59:50 AM »
I agree with WAT. We should just stick with Hampson because although he's a dud, at least we know he's a dud (oh and he trains well too)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #164 on: October 24, 2016, 01:29:08 AM »
and does his job, right along side noddy.....
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI