1
Richmond Rant / Re: Best 23 in 2026?
« Last post by WilliamPowell on Today at 08:37:41 PM »That's enough with the petty insults and cheap shots
Stick to the topic and discussing it
Stick to the topic and discussing it


I guess that's why they had the review.
My thoughts are that last years results papered over the cracks. This year well & truly showed where we're situated.
The ongoing poor recruiting, coaching & lack of fitness was there for all to see. Some of the list changes etc were mind boggling.
Hopefully that'll be well & truly addressed from now on.
We're a professional sporting organisation whose AFLW team has been run in a totally amateur way for some time.

I wouldn’t engage Andy. The guy is a circular reference.
It’s not hard to find many examples of older players - either in the club or brought into a club to take an on field role in player development.
It’s happened time and again over many years.
Not strictly a prerequisite but why wouldn’t you do it?
Norf has had to change it’s recruiting because Brad Scott dumped and ran on all his senior experience and their kids were exposed. Not yet fixed because the decay was so bad on morale.
If the circular reference doesn’t see that, he can continue to chase his tail.
Yeah, bit of an echo chamber.
This is also why we have Taranto and Hopper, if not the reason we recruited them initially.
Thankfully someone else manages the list and runs the club.
Anyone still of the opinion that the club's not taking AFLW seriously?
Thanks to the review they are now (finally)
Anyone still of the opinion that the club's not taking AFLW seriously?