Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
Andrew Raines wasnt Father / Son was he ?

I just realised today, he's the son of his father but not a father/son selection!
13
Andrew Raines wasnt Father / Son was he ?
14
1988   Sean Bowden   Richmond   Michael Bowden   N/A   6   59
1992   Matthew Richardson   Richmond   Alan Richardson   N/A   282   103
1994   David Bourke   Richmond   Francis Bourke   N/A   85   300
1995   Joel Bowden   Richmond   Michael Bowden   N/A   265   57
1995   Nick Jewell   Richmond   Tony Jewell   N/A   1   80
2003   Tom Roach   Richmond   Michael Roach   37   11   200
2017   Patrick Naish   Richmond   Chris Naish   34   9   143

Worth it just for richo
15
Richmond Rant / Re: Kaleb Smith [merged]
« Last post by the claw on Yesterday at 09:10:16 PM »
Lucky to get a game in the seniors after 4 seasons so I’m one who thought he would have been delisted , As there has been suggestions that they may delist other players who play regular senior games  the club must see more in him than I do.

Isn't that where we are at camboon. Reality year two rebuild  of what will likely take 7 seasons to compete at finals level.

They should be delisting players who play regular senior games but are only so so and most likely have reached their ceiling. Keep em or delist em either way we are not going anywhere with them.

Smith while very disappointing so far has some good reasons to keep him. His attributes for a hb or wing role are great you would expect them with top 10 picks. A bit like us taking Algar he had great attributes and we could not leave him there at pick 58.

Also Smiths  first two seasons with us, you can call it making excuses but they were basically ruined with injury.
Reckon WP hit it on the head when he said its his decision making and id say belief that he belongs, that more than anything is holding him back.
His ceiling if it all comes together is quite high imo hense we are prepared  in just our second year of rebuild to  be a bit more patient with him than in other circumstances and with others who have had a good go at it.
16
Richmond Rant / Re: 2025 AFL Draft
« Last post by WilliamPowell on Yesterday at 08:53:10 PM »
@ElliotSinJin
It seems pretty unlikely that Kellaway will be bid on prior to pick 38. I have not seen him in any media top 40 rankings. If a big is made after pick 37 Richmond could literally use pick 99 to match if they chose to.

@ElliotSinJin
I think he definitely gets to us. In a recent interview he said only two clubs had interviewed him outside of richmond

** Accompanying image details updated AFL bid-matching rules, including 10-90% discounts on father-son bids from picks 1-36 and equivalent point matching up to selection 36, enabling low-cost responses like using pick 99 post-pick 37. **

aj, for whatever reason you seem unable or willing to post the links for all the quotes you are posting (copyong) from X (Twitter)

As the @xxxx are not showing as hyperlink that people can click and go to the original post then at a minimum you need to say where you are sourcing them from. Eg "from X"

Below are the 2 links for the 2 quotes above you've copied from X

https://x.com/ElliotSinJin/status/1977842008795545629?t=0_aOeDlue086wXA-kjoHTQ&s=19

https://x.com/ElliotSinJin/status/1977296552835301491?t=9Hq-gFqYZbDDJrjP1JjW-A&s=19
17
Richmond Rant / Re: Any Father sons to look out for?
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 08:28:12 PM »
If Kellaway does not going in the first 36. Richmond can get him for 'free'?

And use the young pick on someone else? Assume there is a list spot.

Can someone that understands the rules clarify pls cheers.

** Accompanying image details updated AFL bid-matching rules, including 10-90% discounts on father-son bids from picks 1-36 and equivalent point matching up to selection 36, enabling low-cost responses like using pick 99 post-pick 37. **

Yeah if there's no bid for him in the top 36-37 or so picks then we can match with literally any pick. Like pick 100 or whatever.

At the moment it looks like we'll be taking a draft kid with 38
18
What it shows is just how big a leg up the northern clubs have been given with their acadamies.
Time to do away with them altogether or clubs have access to all areas and like the draft depending on where you finish get first pick on who they take into their acadamies.

That graph should also give number of players taken in each area and an average seeing as clubs have entered the comp at different times.

The get rid of father/sons because the Cats and Pies have won flags with that rule
19
Richmond Rant / Re: Any Father sons to look out for?
« Last post by ajGreen on Yesterday at 07:25:41 PM »
If Kellaway does not going in the first 36. Richmond can get him for 'free'?

And use the young pick on someone else? Assume there is a list spot.

Can someone that understands the rules clarify pls cheers.

** Accompanying image details updated AFL bid-matching rules, including 10-90% discounts on father-son bids from picks 1-36 and equivalent point matching up to selection 36, enabling low-cost responses like using pick 99 post-pick 37. **
20
Richmond Rant / Re: 2025 AFL Draft
« Last post by MintOnLamb on Yesterday at 07:17:55 PM »
Apart from his name, is he good? Remember Chris Naishes boys were a bust

Plus don’t talk about Disco Bourke
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10