Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Richmond Rant / Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 09:04:35 PM »
Quote from: ajGreen on Yesterday at 08:41:43 PM
Quote from: WilliamPowell on Yesterday at 08:38:49 PM
When bids come in it moves to about 41 ish

Sounds about right

Are you sure?

Might go the other way with picks required to match

Yeah I reckon it won't move much
22
Richmond Rant / Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Last post by ajGreen on Yesterday at 08:41:43 PM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on Yesterday at 08:38:49 PM
When bids come in it moves to about 41 ish

Sounds about right

Are you sure?

Might go the other way with picks required to match
23
Richmond Rant / Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Last post by WilliamPowell on Yesterday at 08:38:49 PM »
When bids come in it moves to about 41 ish

Sounds about right
24
Richmond Rant / Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Last post by eliminator on Yesterday at 06:42:45 PM »
Club done well. Happy with result.
25
Richmond Rant / Ben Miller - contract extension until 2027 (afl site)
« Last post by one-eyed on Yesterday at 05:49:36 PM »
TIGER EXTENDS DEAL

RICHMOND defender Ben Miller has signed on for an extra season, taking himself off next year's free agency list.

Miller was due to come out of contract at the end of 2026, when he would have been a free agent, however he has penned an extension for 2027.

The 26-year-old enjoyed the best season of his career in 2025, playing every game in Richmond's defence.

It has made for Miller playing 44 games over the past two seasons under Richmond coach Adem Yze, having only played 25 in the previous six seasons before that after being drafted in the 2018 intake.

– Callum Twomey

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1441851/inside-trading-time-ticks-on-big-trades-lions-big-new-deal-stalemate-in-blues-bulldogs-talks
26
Richmond Rant / Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Last post by TigerLand on Yesterday at 04:45:54 PM »
Quote from: camboon on Yesterday at 11:26:47 AM
Done deal for pick 38 👍

Baha incredible business week done
27
Richmond Rant / Re: Ivan Soldo traded to Port [merged]
« Last post by JP Tiger on Yesterday at 04:06:19 PM »
I think not all depends on how you define 'worst'.  After all, Port is the club that did recruit (draft) Kane Cornes ...      :P
28
Richmond Rant / Re: Ivan Soldo traded to Port [merged]
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 03:08:47 PM »
Quote from: Damo on Yesterday at 02:37:44 PM
Question for you - which of the following hypotheticals would be the worse “recruit”

Player 1 - traded in for a first round and future first round .. play 6
32 games for the club without being a star

Player 2 - traded in for a third round pick and only manages 6 games before being delisted

By your theory player two is the worse recruit. I disagree a million percent. Player 1 is clearly the better “player”, but is a worse recruit in my mind.


Player 2.

Because a recruit to me is just a player who walked into the club. No price tag.

Nothing to do with the deal or the capital that was paid to get them in the door. That's what constitutes the 'deal'.

So by most metrics I would argue Soldo isn't the worst recruit who ever pulled the jumper on. But definitely has a case going for him being one of the worst deals given the high price for the pissant return.

And because I hate Port I hope they never forget we gift-wrapped them steaming one.
29
Richmond Rant / Re: Ivan Soldo traded to Port [merged]
« Last post by Damo on Yesterday at 02:37:44 PM »
Quote from: Andyy on Yesterday at 01:10:52 PM
Quote from: Damo on Yesterday at 12:49:55 PM
Quote from: Andyy on Yesterday at 10:15:41 AM
I mean...we fleeced them in the trade, but it's not like they haven't had worse recruits lol.

Rory Atkins managed a staggering 3 games before retiring this year...

Rory Atkins was a throw in
Cost them next to nothing

 Factoring that in and what Soldo cost them, Soldo was the worse recruit for sure

Bring out your inner journo, I am antagonising the Cornhead.

Soldo isn't the worst recruit.

Maybe the worst trade deal though :D

Question for you - which of the following hypotheticals would be the worse “recruit”

Player 1 - traded in for a first round and future first round .. play 6
32 games for the club without being a star

Player 2 - traded in for a third round pick and only manages 6 games before being delisted

By your theory player two is the worse recruit. I disagree a million percent. Player 1 is clearly the better “player”, but is a worse recruit in my mind.
30
Richmond Rant / Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Last post by Loui Tufga on Yesterday at 02:23:59 PM »
Done very well, great move Tigers  :clapping
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10