Dimma's dissection (weekly video match review)

[(•))(©™]

Why wasn't Miles in from r1 

Yeh look, we can admit when we get it wrong and that's where we're at, as a club....getting it wrong.

[Diocletian]

Dimma's Dissection is more Reinkaos than Storm of the Light's Bane or The Somberlain...hopefully the club will make like Nödtveidt and just pull the trigger....

[Hellenic Tiger]

these emails we get are nothingbut spam.  they are poo. the club should stop annoying the supporters with this crap.

I find it obscene. From one point of view here is the RFC apparently being transparent to its fanswith Dimma regurgitating the same sugar coated spiel over and over again. Yet on the other hand the club cannot admit they have got some/alot of things wrong and how to deal with it.
Garbage.

[bojangles17]

BG did admit in a recent interview they had made some mistakes he didn't want to be drawn on specifics , thats being professional not failing to be transparent  ,

[WilliamPowell]

BG did admit in a recent interview they had made some mistakes he didn't want to be drawn on specifics , thats being professional not failing to be transparent  ,

No it's not being honest with your greatest stakeholders because you don't want to embarrass yourself 

[TigerMonk]

l see all this as training for life after coaching. Poor professionals. AXE THIS RUBBISH & spend more time coaching & tactics

[(•))(©™]

I live by this
"He who pays, says"
Says is pronounced like pays tho so it rhymes
 Anyway, sack him.

[bojangles17]

BG did admit in a recent interview they had made some mistakes he didn't want to be drawn on specifics , thats being professional not failing to be transparent  ,

No it's not being honest with your greatest stakeholders because you don't want to embarrass yourself 

C'mon , you can't be serious , the mistakes will be addressed when they can post season with sackings and appointments , not sure the members need be consulted throughout , what kind of arrogance is that. Ask not what the RFC can do for you, what can you do for the RFC 

[WilliamPowell]

C'mon , you can't be serious , the mistakes will be addressed when they can post season with sackings and appointments , not sure the members need be consulted throughout , what kind of arrogance is that. Ask not what the RFC can do for you, what can you do for the RFC 

Very serious, all we've had this year is spin, spin and just to be sure more spin.

A shot of good old fashioned honesty wouldn't go astray

Did I mention anything about them "consulting" with members? No! so don't accuse me or anyone else of arrogance

And please don't insult my intelligence with cheap shots about what I can do for the club. I do plenty for the RFC, don't think I'm expecting to much to expect a little of bit of respect to be shown to members in return

You may think everything is swell but got a news flash for you; it isn't and it's about time they were held to account by its members

[Yeahright]

And please don't insult my intelligence with cheap shots about what I can do for the club. I do plenty for the RFC, don't think I'm expecting to much to expect a little of bit of respect to be shown to members in return

I know Bojangles is being his usual twit self but how do you take that as an insult to your intelligence

[Rampstar]

there peeing on the supporters but there telling us its raining ... theyre a dead set bunch of wankers

[unplugged]

Loyd criticism of Cotchin against Sydney:  "Sideways, Backwards, Chips"

Cotchin: "Criticising Lloyd"  "2nd highest metres gained"

Hardwick having a crack at Lloyd:  "poor criticism"  "meters gained he led"  "bizarre comment" "dont let the facts get in the way of a good story"

Lyon:  According to champion data, Cotchin was 13th, 8th out of the Richmond players for meters gained.  (This in a 30+ possession game).

A couple of things I took out of this.

1)  Both Cotchin and Hardwick have the same smug, arrogant, smartass attitude to the media.  Something they haven't earned or deserve.  They are so similar in their attitude that it is disgusting.  You know how Cotchin gained the captaincy.  (Coaches pet).
2)  Neither has any idea what the meters gained by Cotchin was against Sydney.  Big difference between first, second and 13th.
3)  The club, Hardwick or Cotchin are either extremely incompetent (how can your data be so wrong) or incredibly dishonest.  Trying to deflect by attacking anyone that legitimately criticizes them.  If their data is wrong, how much else are they assuming based on false data and weak foundations.  Draft picks, player selections, match day strategies?
4) They are either incredibly stupid or dishonest or they think fans and the media are beneath contempt and are extremely stupid.  No way you could watch the Sydney game and consider for a moment that Cotchin might lead or be 2nd in meters gained, when so few possessions went forward.  You couldn't rationally make that assessment.

There was also a good infographic on talking footy, where 4 out of the top 10 players for one, two handballs were Richmond players.  It does show that despite the high possession count of some of our players, the value of their output is inflated. We have a lot of players that share the ball around to no real effect.  Highlighting this is the absence of Ablett on that list, he gets plenty of the ball, but he doesn't muck around with it.

Multiple Possession Chains.

Harvey 59
Cotchin 51
Martin 51
Pendlebury 51
Gibson 46
Stanton 46
Houli 43
Macrae 41
Rockliff 40
Ellis 40

[Chuck17]

A couple of things I took out of this.

1)  Both Cotchin and Hardwick have the same smug, arrogant, smartass attitude to the media.  Something they haven't earned or deserve.  They are so similar in their attitude that it is disgusting.  You know how Cotchin gained the captaincy.  (Coaches pet).
2)  Neither has any idea what the meters gained by Cotchin was against Sydney.  Big difference between first, second and 13th.
3)  The club, Hardwick or Cotchin are either extremely incompetent (how can your data be so wrong) or incredibly dishonest.  Trying to deflect by attacking anyone that legitimately criticizes them.  If their data is wrong, how much else are they assuming based on false data and weak foundations.  Draft picks, player selections, match day strategies?
4) They are either incredibly stupid or dishonest or they think fans and the media are beneath contempt and are extremely stupid.  No way you could watch the Sydney game and consider for a moment that Cotchin might lead or be 2nd in meters gained, when so few possessions went forward.  You couldn't rationally make that assessment.
5) Regardless of what he says Lloyd is still a flog

EFA

[Yeahright]

At one point not long ago Cotchin was averaging most metres gained from stoppages in the AFL

[Diocletian]

At one point not long ago Cotchin was averaging most metres gained from stoppages in the AFL

Matters little to the bitter Delazyo fangirls.