« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?  (Read 5782 times)

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4261
Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« on: May 21, 2012, 09:31:44 PM »
We have to let players go but sometimes it would be nice to get them back if we could take them for nothing. Do we have any players worth a second chance?  :o
Logged

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2012, 09:47:06 PM »
Jason Torney
Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2012, 09:58:12 PM »
Chris Naish
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2012, 10:00:58 PM »
i went other and picked schulz.
we could do with a real solid consistent team oriented kpf atm
even in saying this i know we did the right thing in cutting him. we had something like 7 yrs of mostly mediocre and inconsistent performances and something had to give.
we sto this day hang onto players for far to long who have been mostly mediocre inconsistent and with big flaws in their games.
Logged

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2012, 10:16:28 PM »
I'd have Shultz but he was a cancer in our club and thats why we got rid of him.

Lost us our TAC sponsorship.
Logged
Quote from: the claw on December 10, 2013, 11:44:23 PM
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
Quote from: the claw on January 09, 2014, 09:00:49 PM
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2012, 10:20:37 PM »
Yeah Shultcz was a disgrace.
Logged
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2012, 10:20:56 PM »
Will Thursfield
Logged

Offline rufio_1991

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
  • #23
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2012, 10:25:03 PM »
mitch farmer

had a great kick and could kick goals, surprised why we didn't trial him in the forward line
Logged

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2012, 10:26:08 PM »
Quote from: Mrakov on May 21, 2012, 10:16:28 PM
I'd have Shultz but he was a cancer in our club and thats why we got rid of him.

Lost us our TAC sponsorship.

Cancer and thats why we got rid of him? He left by HIS choice. Had a few clubs interested in him in 2009 so he left. Could have stayed if he wanted because he was contracted. Zantuck, Schulz and others all had a role in losing that sponsorship. Schulz was just the final nail. Made us a poo load money anyway.

anyway, Schulz and an in form Rodan are two blokes I'd have back
Logged

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2012, 10:54:51 PM »
Um, where the stuff is the Relton Roberts voting option I was promised?  >:(
« Last Edit: May 21, 2012, 11:10:44 PM by Dookie »
Logged

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2012, 11:10:40 PM »
 :burgereater
Logged

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5090
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2012, 11:12:49 PM »
I've been following the Burang Bullet on da tweets bruz.

from 4th of May:
'2 minute noodles and cans before footy tomorra bruz. #carbs'

http://twitter.com/#!/scooby_50
Logged

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #12 on: May 22, 2012, 06:20:44 AM »
Quote from: Willy on May 21, 2012, 11:12:49 PM
I've been following the Burang Bullet on da tweets bruz.

from 4th of May:
'2 minute noodles and cans before footy tomorra bruz. #carbs'

http://twitter.com/#!/scooby_50

OMG!! That is pure class those tweets I'm following!
Logged
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Sabretooth

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #13 on: May 22, 2012, 08:50:02 AM »
Schulz is a notable omission from the options listed in the poll.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2012, 02:31:17 PM by Sabretooth »
Logged

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?
« Reply #14 on: May 22, 2012, 10:02:53 AM »
Schulz without doubt.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »