Author Topic: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?  (Read 2571 times)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2012, 06:53:03 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2012, 07:09:31 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Who wouldn't want Luke Carey in your best 22

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2012, 07:12:55 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Did they not play games this year?

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #18 on: October 14, 2012, 07:53:32 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Did they not play games this year?

Was that not because Vickery and Grimes were injured? They're not in the best 22. Unless they have massive pre-seasons then you'd think both will start at Coburg. Grimes, Chappy & Rance are locks as our 3 tall defenders. Jack is a cert and last season they played Vickery over Post and McG despite Vicks not getting a kick for most of the season. If we go with 3 talls up forward then it is most likely going to be Astbury who gets first crack.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #19 on: October 14, 2012, 08:51:07 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Did they not play games this year?

Was that not because Vickery and Grimes were injured? They're not in the best 22. Unless they have massive pre-seasons then you'd think both will start at Coburg. Grimes, Chappy & Rance are locks as our 3 tall defenders. Jack is a cert and last season they played Vickery over Post and McG despite Vicks not getting a kick for most of the season. If we go with 3 talls up forward then it is most likely going to be Astbury who gets first crack.

So you think Vickery Reiwoldt and Astbury will all go the whole season without injury and missing a game?

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13303
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #20 on: October 14, 2012, 09:00:51 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Did they not play games this year?

Was that not because Vickery and Grimes were injured? They're not in the best 22. Unless they have massive pre-seasons then you'd think both will start at Coburg. Grimes, Chappy & Rance are locks as our 3 tall defenders. Jack is a cert and last season they played Vickery over Post and McG despite Vicks not getting a kick for most of the season. If we go with 3 talls up forward then it is most likely going to be Astbury who gets first crack.

So you think Vickery Reiwoldt and Astbury will all go the whole season without injury and missing a game?

If JR gets injured there is no excuse, should still kick a 100 and make the Coleman worthwhile

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #21 on: October 14, 2012, 09:49:25 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Did they not play games this year?

Was that not because Vickery and Grimes were injured? They're not in the best 22. Unless they have massive pre-seasons then you'd think both will start at Coburg. Grimes, Chappy & Rance are locks as our 3 tall defenders. Jack is a cert and last season they played Vickery over Post and McG despite Vicks not getting a kick for most of the season. If we go with 3 talls up forward then it is most likely going to be Astbury who gets first crack.

So you think Vickery Reiwoldt and Astbury will all go the whole season without injury and missing a game?

What has that got to do with whether Post/McGuane will be an asset for Nahas? How can you be an asset to someone when you rarely play in the same team? Vickery & Riewoldt both played 22 games each in 2011. This is not a discussion about "what if so and so get injured".

FMD some of you blokes.....:cheers

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #22 on: October 15, 2012, 06:55:19 AM »
Reckon post will be better than astbury. Astbury gets outmuscled very easily even at 93kg. Not the best in the air either

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #23 on: October 15, 2012, 09:57:49 AM »
Did take a fine one hander on Mike Hurley though. That makes anyones highlight package ;D

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #24 on: October 15, 2012, 02:10:23 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Did they not play games this year?

Was that not because Vickery and Grimes were injured? They're not in the best 22. Unless they have massive pre-seasons then you'd think both will start at Coburg. Grimes, Chappy & Rance are locks as our 3 tall defenders. Jack is a cert and last season they played Vickery over Post and McG despite Vicks not getting a kick for most of the season. If we go with 3 talls up forward then it is most likely going to be Astbury who gets first crack.

So you think Vickery Reiwoldt and Astbury will all go the whole season without injury and missing a game?

What has that got to do with whether Post/McGuane will be an asset for Nahas? How can you be an asset to someone when you rarely play in the same team? Vickery & Riewoldt both played 22 games each in 2011. This is not a discussion about "what if so and so get injured".

FMD some of you blokes.....:cheers

But they didn't in 2012 or 2010. Nahas problem is consistency. Someone gets injured, Post/McGuane take their place and if they play well then Nahas doesn't suffer therefore hopefully keeps his consistency up

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #25 on: October 15, 2012, 02:22:28 PM »
I've seen him kick on his left in 3 or 4 games. Wasn't too bad on it. Needs to use it more often
if you think he has a left side you will never ever see fault with our players.  his left side is almost non existent and it has cost us big time on too many occasions. imo his right foot lacks penetrsation and is barley passable.
if you cant be objective and honest about our players whats the point in even discussing them.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #26 on: October 15, 2012, 02:34:21 PM »
What are McGuane and Post going to do to help Nahas out?

Provide a contest to rove to. You know, the normal stuff

Nahas doesn't play for Coburg.

Didn't watch the last 9 games of the season? Clash with Port games?

Didn't realise you think Post & McG are in our best 22. Very interesting.

Did they not play games this year?

Was that not because Vickery and Grimes were injured? They're not in the best 22. Unless they have massive pre-seasons then you'd think both will start at Coburg. Grimes, Chappy & Rance are locks as our 3 tall defenders. Jack is a cert and last season they played Vickery over Post and McG despite Vicks not getting a kick for most of the season. If we go with 3 talls up forward then it is most likely going to be Astbury who gets first crack.

So you think Vickery Reiwoldt and Astbury will all go the whole season without injury and missing a game?

What has that got to do with whether Post/McGuane will be an asset for Nahas? How can you be an asset to someone when you rarely play in the same team? Vickery & Riewoldt both played 22 games each in 2011. This is not a discussion about "what if so and so get injured".

FMD some of you blokes.....:cheers

But they didn't in 2012 or 2010. Nahas problem is consistency. Someone gets injured, Post/McGuane take their place and if they play well then Nahas doesn't suffer therefore hopefully keeps his consistency up

Jack plays every game, never gets injured. Vickery didn't play every game in 2010 because he was a pup, still played 14 games though. I think we can all agree Post & McGuane won't be playing much part in our push for finals. Not sure they were ever going to somehow lift Nahas' game either :lol

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 26. Robin Nahas?
« Reply #27 on: October 15, 2012, 02:35:42 PM »
I've seen him kick on his left in 3 or 4 games. Wasn't too bad on it. Needs to use it more often
if you think he has a left side you will never ever see fault with our players.  his left side is almost non existent and it has cost us big time on too many occasions. imo his right foot lacks penetrsation and is barley passable.
if you cant be objective and honest about our players whats the point in even discussing them.

Good post. Nahas has close the worst left foot in the comp. Inexcusable for an AFL player to be so poor on one side of the body like that