Changes for the Dees game?

[🏅Dooks]

ins ~ anyone whos prepared to go hard for Tommy and get the job done.

outs ~ squibs, softies and pea hearts. 

[Chuck17]

But Chaplin grigg houli hamoson Newman in our best 22

Do I need to quiklax their milo tonight?? 

Yes pls

[Mr Magic]

In: Petterd, Lennon, Griffiths
Out: Newman, Gordon, Adwards

[Lozza]

So does anyone have any information re whether Miles will be elevated off the rookie list shortly? Can't see what we have to lose and with games against the Dees and GWS it's the perfect time to test him out at the top level.

[tony_montana]

So does anyone have any information re whether Miles will be elevated off the rookie list shortly? Can't see what we have to lose and with games against the Dees and GWS it's the perfect time to test him out at the top level.

Thats not the way our coaching staff roll, they like to blood players against a top side and the drop them a week later

[Lozza]

So does anyone have any information re whether Miles will be elevated off the rookie list shortly? Can't see what we have to lose and with games against the Dees and GWS it's the perfect time to test him out at the top level.

Thats not the way our coaching staff roll, they like to blood players against a top side and the drop them a week later

Spoken like a long time Tigers supporter
Read somewhere else that Darrou was being considered and that Miles could be elevated after round 11, how does that work?

[Eat_em_Alive]

^ 
I actually think to put Jake King on LTI, we need to give an estimated return date for him. And because we don't have one yet we can elevate Miles. Is this correct?

[dwaino]

^ 
I actually think to put Jake King on LTI, we need to give an estimated return date for him. And because we don't have one yet we can elevate Miles. Is this correct?

I don't think so. I'm pretty sure you only have to say long term, as in definitely 8 weeks or longer, and have the injury report verified by an AFL doctor just to make sure you aren't telling porkies.

[Eat_em_Alive]

Cheers man, im pretty sure I read that somewhere so some journo just makin poo up to suit their article of the hour... 

[WilliamPowell]

^ 
I actually think to put Jake King on LTI, we need to give an estimated return date for him. And because we don't have one yet we can elevate Miles. Is this correct?

Jake King is already on the LTI - he was put on it a fortnight ago (I think this is 4th or 5th time I've posted it since it happened  ) Kingy has to be on ther LTI for a minimum of 8 weeks

So if the club wants to elevate another rookie they can right now

All clubs can elevate a rookie after round 11.

So if the RFC wanted to they could elevate one now for King and then elevate another one when King comes off the LTI. But once King comes off the LTI then a rookie will need to be put back on the LTI

[(•))(©™]

NOT VICKERY  !!!!

[MADTIGER2010]

In Foley, Griffiths Lennon
Out Newman Gordon A Edwards

[Hard Roar Tiger]

^ 
I actually think to put Jake King on LTI, we need to give an estimated return date for him. And because we don't have one yet we can elevate Miles. Is this correct?

Jake King is already on the LTI - he was put on it a fortnight ago (I think this is 4th or 5th time I've posted it since it happened  ) Kingy has to be on ther LTI for a minimum of 8 weeks

So if the club wants to elevate another rookie they can right now

All clubs can elevate a rookie after round 11.

So if the RFC wanted to they could elevate one now for King and then elevate another one when King comes off the LTI. But once King comes off the LTI then a rookie will need to be put back on the LTI

Might be worth:-
A. Sticky the rules of elevating rookies because its clearly not sticking with us posters
B. add current upgraded rookies and available  slots available

[YellowandBlackBlood]

^ 
I actually think to put Jake King on LTI, we need to give an estimated return date for him. And because we don't have one yet we can elevate Miles. Is this correct?

Jake King is already on the LTI - he was put on it a fortnight ago (I think this is 4th or 5th time I've posted it since it happened  ) Kingy has to be on ther LTI for a minimum of 8 weeks

So if the club wants to elevate another rookie they can right now

All clubs can elevate a rookie after round 11.

So if the RFC wanted to they could elevate one now for King and then elevate another one when King comes off the LTI. But once King comes off the LTI then a rookie will need to be put back on the LTI

The latter only needs to happen if they elevate a second rookie after round 11. If they just cover Jake, they can nominate the same rookie to be re elevated once Jake comes back.

[Eat_em_Alive]

^ 
I actually think to put Jake King on LTI, we need to give an estimated return date for him. And because we don't have one yet we can elevate Miles. Is this correct?

Jake King is already on the LTI - he was put on it a fortnight ago (I think this is 4th or 5th time I've posted it since it happened  ) Kingy has to be on ther LTI for a minimum of 8 weeks

So if the club wants to elevate another rookie they can right now

All clubs can elevate a rookie after round 11.

So if the RFC wanted to they could elevate one now for King and then elevate another one when King comes off the LTI. But once King comes off the LTI then a rookie will need to be put back on the LTI

Might be worth:-
A. Sticky the rules of elevating rookies because its clearly not sticking with us posters
B. add current upgraded rookies and available  slots available

Great idea mate
I feel bad now knowing WP has been on a keyboard frenzy about the same stuff 
To be fair though alot of threads feel similiar to me with all the meltdowns and sack hardwick posts I get confused which thread I was in.