Darrou zero games. - good form in twos
Chaplin never dropped - shyte form in ones
Darrou was on the rookie list - should've been elevated when Astbury went down and Miles earlier instead of Thomarse.
Arnot was playing well, was rewarded but played out of position in the FP where he returned figures similar to King ...the biggest joke was the match where they brought him in for Thomarse but then played him as a defensive forward and stuck Petterd - an actual defensive forward - in the middle instead.
Despite also not being played in his best position for most of the year, McDonough did everything right in the twos and not too much wrong in his few senior appearances, both him & Dea deserved games over Newman, who was a liabilty all year.
Grigg as usual was useless all year but no real direct outside mid replacement putting pressure on except maybe Gordon - and they were both playing by the end. Would've preferred Gordon to Grigg, with Lennon and O'Hanlon alternating between Gordon's role & sub.
Speaking of O'Hanlon - comes on as a sub, has 9 decent touches in a quarter, then gets dropped.
Maybe they weren't all bashing down the door (and I don't even rate a couple of them that highly myself), but they were at least knocking on it and all showed they could at least be serviceable and no worse, if not better, than the same old hacks serving up the same old crap. Hacks that've already reached their ceiling and are no chance of inproving and , if anything, are only going to get worse.