Also responsible for more than three times the deaths than Hitler.
We, do not hear, much about those 3 million dead indians Churchill was responsible for, do we?
http://www.ibtimes.com/bengal-famine-1943-man-made-holocaust-1100525
"I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly."
I don't really care though as I'm quite apathetic and with a mild strain of misanthropy. I was only trying to make a point. Now just quoting though for posterity to highlight the hypocrisy. 
You cannot be surprised than, that others care not old Joe broke a few eggs to make an omelette then, eh? How many were saved, by Russia not failing, big picture?
History is often rough of the most powerful men in the following years. After they die. As a few 100 year go past people often change their tune. Khan. Alex the great. Etc.
While I share your dislike of mankind (bastards) I fail to see te hypocrisy, comrade. One historian said something along the lines of
at his best better than Peter the Great, at his worst worse than ivan the terrible. Complicated geezer, i think you may be oversimplifying it with pure death counts.
anywhoo - obama is doing his best to catch up;
https://www.iraqbodycount.org/Do Telstra also tell them to pretend they're from Microsoft?
an authority source told me telstra dont actually ring u from india, my bad
just outsource 1000s of jobs and give the ceo 5 million pay outs
