Author Topic: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick  (Read 2343 times)

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2016, 11:29:54 PM »
You don't beat reigning premiers for several years with the wrong cattle.  Injuries play a huge part in our club the past few years. We have the players but need to change the way we play. Direct down the guts movement with big marking forwards win more games than going Backwards, Sideways, Playing wide hogging the boundry. The coach needs to take action on players who commit the same errors. If you going to lose you may as well lose by being tough on the players & if that means dropping players for constant rubbish just do it. The game plan is not working & breaking down badly. The coach has had long enough to build several game plans against all sides. This is not happening & we do have the right players. Off with the 2 coaches heads Hardwick & Chocco must go. Its been a failed summer getting it through & the coach must be terminated tomorrow

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2016, 07:03:33 AM »
Agree tm

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2016, 07:10:26 AM »
What time is it happening tomorrow?

Offline Heart of Darkness

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2016, 10:00:06 AM »
You don't beat reigning premiers for several years with the wrong cattle.  Injuries play a huge part in our club the past few years. We have the players but need to change the way we play. Direct down the guts movement with big marking forwards win more games than going Backwards, Sideways, Playing wide hogging the boundry. The coach needs to take action on players who commit the same errors. If you going to lose you may as well lose by being tough on the players & if that means dropping players for constant rubbish just do it. The game plan is not working & breaking down badly. The coach has had long enough to build several game plans against all sides. This is not happening & we do have the right players. Off with the 2 coaches heads Hardwick & Chocco must go. Its been a failed summer getting it through & the coach must be terminated tomorrow

You really think a side with Chaplin, Moore, Hunt and Hampson isn't the wrong cattle? Then you've got guys picked up from the VFL in Lloyd and Lambert (who've actually been two of our best this year), guys picked up from other clubs who should be fringe 22 but seem to critical components (Houli, Grigg), overrated 1st round draft picks who get around like they're guns (Ellis and Vickery) and kids who show promise but probably aren't ready (C Ellis, Menadue and Rioli).

Don't get me wrong there are big issues with coaching, developing etc. but we also desperately need more class.

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2457
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2016, 11:46:55 AM »
Hardwick had more resources but he had a compromised draft. Frawley had the best list vs the rest of the competition.Campbell, knights, Richo, they just over rated the 2nd and 3rrd teir players on the list. Wallace had no resources and a poor list and over rated his own coaching ability.  None have actually been good teachers or good judges of talent.

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2016, 05:18:32 PM »
Hardwick had more resources but he had a compromised draft. Frawley had the best list vs the rest of the competition.Campbell, knights, Richo, they just over rated the 2nd and 3rrd teir players on the list. Wallace had no resources and a poor list and over rated his own coaching ability.  None have actually been good teachers or good judges of talent.

if you reckon Richo Campbell & Knights are 3rd tier players you should stop watching the game & go follow golf & be someone's bag goffer. They were 3 very high quality players who needed a bit more help from the club.  :lol

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2016, 05:20:17 PM »
Reckon we need to go to the photo to split them

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5090
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #22 on: April 16, 2016, 05:20:34 PM »
Hardwick had more resources but he had a compromised draft. Frawley had the best list vs the rest of the competition.Campbell, knights, Richo, they just over rated the 2nd and 3rrd teir players on the list. Wallace had no resources and a poor list and over rated his own coaching ability.  None have actually been good teachers or good judges of talent.

if you reckon Richo Campbell & Knights are 3rd tier players you should stop watching the game & go follow golf & be someone's bag goffer. They were 3 very high quality players who needed a bit more help from the club.  :lol

You misread Tdy's post.

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #23 on: April 16, 2016, 05:29:02 PM »
Hardwick had more resources but he had a compromised draft. Frawley had the best list vs the rest of the competition.Campbell, knights, Richo, they just over rated the 2nd and 3rrd teir players on the list. Wallace had no resources and a poor list and over rated his own coaching ability.  None have actually been good teachers or good judges of talent.

if you reckon Richo Campbell & Knights are 3rd tier players you should stop watching the game & go follow golf & be someone's bag goffer. They were 3 very high quality players who needed a bit more help from the club.  :lol

You misread Tdy's post.

Yes l did  :snidegrin so sorry  ;D

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13940
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #25 on: April 16, 2016, 06:01:51 PM »
So Danny Frawley tell me why Hawthorn has not beaten Richmond in several years. His article makes no sense. When our players are not injured we are matching the Hawthorns & beating them so our recruiting has worked. Its the other players that need games into them. We have had some bad runs of injury the last few years. Hawks were very lucky to beat the Saints today & had to rely on Luke Hodge & Mitchell. They have alot of injuries also & the Box Hill Hawks have been good for some seasons while we have struggled & are building Richmond reserves side. We have also drafted players who walked away from the club 5 times at least in the last few seasons so that hurts any club. If we beat the Hawks in the premiership season again what will the next article be about  :snidegrin

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #26 on: April 16, 2016, 06:09:57 PM »
Hardwick Malaka by a mile
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline 1980

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #27 on: April 16, 2016, 07:53:10 PM »
There is no difference between Frawley and Hardwick. They are the same person

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #28 on: April 16, 2016, 07:55:53 PM »
Hardwick knows more words
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline 1980

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Frawley vs Wallace vs Hardwick
« Reply #29 on: April 16, 2016, 08:00:44 PM »
Hardwick knows more words

When Hardwick opens his mouth its Benny Gale speaking