Author Topic: Tylar Young [merged]  (Read 49362 times)

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41554
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #210 on: September 19, 2025, 07:20:17 AM »
We just be really stupid to not want this guy to stay.

They want him to stay

But he has to want to stay.

If he doesn't and chooses to walk that's on him not the Club
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14364
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #211 on: September 19, 2025, 08:08:11 AM »
We just be really stupid to not want this guy to stay.

They want him to stay

But he has to want to stay.

If he doesn't and chooses to walk that's on him not the Club

Yeah okay. What if the offer is a slap in the face that makes him want to leave?

The club is riding on the fact that gibcus and balta will take us to the promised land.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4046
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #212 on: September 19, 2025, 08:41:36 AM »
We just be really stupid to not want this guy to stay.

They want him to stay

But he has to want to stay.

If he doesn't and chooses to walk that's on him not the Club

Yeah okay. What if the offer is a slap in the face that makes him want to leave?

The club is riding on the fact that gibcus and balta will take us to the promised land.

His not worth a 4 year contract full stop based on 8 games this year regardless just like Ryan wasn't either

Offline ajGreen

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #213 on: September 19, 2025, 08:59:39 AM »
Young for a decent pick is a win IMO.

Just a shame blight is leaving.

Young. Blight. Kosi. Is a lot out

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14364
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #214 on: September 19, 2025, 09:15:31 AM »
We just be really stupid to not want this guy to stay.

They want him to stay

But he has to want to stay.

If he doesn't and chooses to walk that's on him not the Club

Yeah okay. What if the offer is a slap in the face that makes him want to leave?

The club is riding on the fact that gibcus and balta will take us to the promised land.

His not worth a 4 year contract full stop based on 8 games this year regardless just like Ryan wasn't either

is that what he wants? We know this for sure?

young and 2 other talls going is a fair bit IMO.

Gibcus has proven nothing

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4046
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #215 on: September 19, 2025, 12:29:27 PM »
We just be really stupid to not want this guy to stay.

They want him to stay

But he has to want to stay.

If he doesn't and chooses to walk that's on him not the Club

Yeah okay. What if the offer is a slap in the face that makes him want to leave?

The club is riding on the fact that gibcus and balta will take us to the promised land.

His not worth a 4 year contract full stop based on 8 games this year regardless just like Ryan wasn't either

is that what he wants? We know this for sure?

young and 2 other talls going is a fair bit IMO.

Gibcus has proven nothing

That's the rumour 4 year deal
Gibcus has had injury on pure talent it's chalk and cheese, but if he stays fit.
Grey can conver his position
May a rookie tall to like a Zain Lockwood In our academy

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11104
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #216 on: September 19, 2025, 12:49:24 PM »
I believe we've offered him two years. If someone's offered him 4 we may need to at least offer three.

We don't need talls, period, unless there's an actual mature body KPF who we can bring in if Lynch goes down and Lefau isn't fit.

Miller, Young, Balta, Gibcus, Trainor, Gray. Even Brown and Broad. We are sorted down back to the point that we delisted Blight.

Forward we have Lynch, Lefau, Armstrong, Faull, Sims. Much less suitable demographic.

Offline ajGreen

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #217 on: September 19, 2025, 12:56:34 PM »
I believe we've offered him two years. If someone's offered him 4 we may need to at least offer three.

We don't need talls, period, unless there's an actual mature body KPF who we can bring in if Lynch goes down and Lefau isn't fit.

Miller, Young, Balta, Gibcus, Trainor, Gray. Even Brown and Broad. We are sorted down back to the point that we delisted Blight.

Forward we have Lynch, Lefau, Armstrong, Faull, Sims. Much less suitable demographic.

Don't agree.

Balta. Gibcus. Miller. Trainor. Gray. - is not enough key defenders. More so when you consider the coach like to play  4 bigs in the back 6.

Young. Blight. Kosi. Is a lot of depth to lose in one go.


Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11104
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #218 on: September 19, 2025, 01:37:54 PM »
I believe we've offered him two years. If someone's offered him 4 we may need to at least offer three.

We don't need talls, period, unless there's an actual mature body KPF who we can bring in if Lynch goes down and Lefau isn't fit.

Miller, Young, Balta, Gibcus, Trainor, Gray. Even Brown and Broad. We are sorted down back to the point that we delisted Blight.

Forward we have Lynch, Lefau, Armstrong, Faull, Sims. Much less suitable demographic.

Don't agree.

Balta. Gibcus. Miller. Trainor. Gray. - is not enough key defenders. More so when you consider the coach like to play  4 bigs in the back 6.

Young. Blight. Kosi. Is a lot of depth to lose in one go.



I meant that I'm not taking a Zain Lockwood as a rookie when we've just cut Blight.

Just keep Blight instead. Simple.

Offline ajGreen

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #219 on: September 19, 2025, 02:03:50 PM »
I believe we've offered him two years. If someone's offered him 4 we may need to at least offer three.

We don't need talls, period, unless there's an actual mature body KPF who we can bring in if Lynch goes down and Lefau isn't fit.

Miller, Young, Balta, Gibcus, Trainor, Gray. Even Brown and Broad. We are sorted down back to the point that we delisted Blight.

Forward we have Lynch, Lefau, Armstrong, Faull, Sims. Much less suitable demographic.

Don't agree.

Balta. Gibcus. Miller. Trainor. Gray. - is not enough key defenders. More so when you consider the coach like to play  4 bigs in the back 6.

Young. Blight. Kosi. Is a lot of depth to lose in one go.



I meant that I'm not taking a Zain Lockwood as a rookie when we've just cut Blight.

Just keep Blight instead. Simple.

I would but sounds like it's not happening

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4394
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #220 on: September 20, 2025, 10:04:51 AM »
I believe we've offered him two years. If someone's offered him 4 we may need to at least offer three.

We don't need talls, period, unless there's an actual mature body KPF who we can bring in if Lynch goes down and Lefau isn't fit.

Miller, Young, Balta, Gibcus, Trainor, Gray. Even Brown and Broad. We are sorted down back to the point that we delisted Blight.

Forward we have Lynch, Lefau, Armstrong, Faull, Sims. Much less suitable demographic.



Don't agree.

Balta. Gibcus. Miller. Trainor. Gray. - is not enough key defenders. More so when you consider the coach like to play  4 bigs in the back 6.

Young. Blight. Kosi. Is a lot of depth to lose in one go.

With Andy on this one. even with the loss off those three can add Bauer in that mix as a tall thats gone as well. Its only a problem if we have no one left. But we have tons of tall defenders even some who may become tall defenders.

Its not depth that should be debated here, its how we rate and rank those we have keeping those we rank highest and getting rid of excess for good reasons.
 Its not about next year or the year after but about four or five years time. That means we still have plenty of time to get a f/a or draft another tall defender if need be.

Historically and its a league thing that most clubs  go with two big kpd we generally have a third tall think Grimes and for the last 10 years we have had Broad who really is a medium who just happens to be on the taller side.

I have banged on about mirroring what we do in the seniors in the magoos.

 imo the ideal has long been 4 big KPD and two third tall types with the rest being small/or mediums or even talls who play like general defenders ie Broad.

the hope  would be based on current players we have

Vlastuin - Miller/Balta - Trainor/Brown
Banks - Gibcus/Gray - Broad/Campbell

The ressies

Trezise - Miller/Balta - Trainor/Brown
Smith - Gibcus/Gray - Broad/Short/Smillie



Then add in someone like Liam Fawcett who may be down the pecking order a tad as a forward  but is converted to Kpd then of course if most dont make it we go back to the well.

One thing for sure is we have more than enough kpds and tall defenders and options. We  actually have too many.We just have to have faith that they will develop.

I hope in a few years time we are having the same problem and thats deciding who to keep and who to trade. To me thats what good list management is all about sometimes you have to give up a good player.


Key forwards and third tall forwards well we have KPF Armstrong, Faull, Sims, Fawcett  thats your senior and reserves kpf covered.
 in the short term we have Lynch and Lefau for maturity and experience.
Finding a third tall type who can play like a medium is a type we dont have. Of course the argument is the lack of general forwards of quality and real potential outside of Algar. Atm we are going to be heavily reliant on mid/forwards to roll thru the fwd half Campbell,Hotton, Lalor.

An emerging ruckman is a need outside wings of quality is a need imo we are going to need all of four years to become really competetive.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41554
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Tylar Young Requests Trade to WCE
« Reply #221 on: Yesterday at 09:52:17 PM »
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #222 on: Yesterday at 11:23:51 PM »
Well since he is out of contract and considering the eagles could walk him to the PSD, we’re not gonna get much here. I’m guessing we get their pick 52 which we will use to match a kellaway bid.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5903
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #223 on: Today at 12:45:35 AM »
Pick 52 will do. Anything else would be a huge win. They have PSD pick, and all leverage. Take 52 and run unfortunately.
Go Tigers!