Author Topic: Free agency proposal for compo to not start until after draft pick 8 (AFL)  (Read 42 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 102490
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Free agency compensation picks would not start in the draft until after pick No.8 under a significant change being considered by the AFL.

It means top free agents who leave non-finalists could only warrant Pick 9 as compensation, at best, with the top eight picks protected.

It’s unclear whether this proposal would see all non-finalists given Pick 9 as band one compensation and picks would be awarded as they are currently for non-finalists, or if picks would flow on from Pick 9 downwards meaning the second-worst team could only get Pick 10, the third-worst team could only get Pick 11, and so on.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1464575/the-major-free-agency-change-being-considered
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-latest-news-updates-for-thursday-february-12-2026-carlton-part-ways-with-mick-agresta-fatherson-demon-kalani-white/news-story/ede3fbc15485b9ca4a6c78b0ebe4213b

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11465
Or protect the top 10 all non-finalists

Or just get rid of it

And remove F/S discounts

etc

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41906
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Said it before so many times

The AFL's F/A system too heavily favours the players it is not a fair system

So...

Get rid of the compo and allow clubs to trade players wherever they want.

Even it out giving clubs some control back
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11465
Said it before so many times

The AFL's F/A system too heavily favours the players it is not a fair system

So...

Get rid of the compo and allow clubs to trade players wherever they want.

Even it out giving clubs some control back

Perfect, love it.

They do it in the USA.

Wages are going up plenty, no excuse not to be able to move interstate for a little while.

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5278
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Said it before so many times

The AFL's F/A system too heavily favours the players it is not a fair system

So...

Get rid of the compo and allow clubs to trade players wherever they want.

Even it out giving clubs some control back

Perfect, love it.

They do it in the USA.

Wages are going up plenty, no excuse not to be able to move interstate for a little while.

Your knowledge of USA sports and no trade clauses is obviously limited

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11465
Said it before so many times

The AFL's F/A system too heavily favours the players it is not a fair system

So...

Get rid of the compo and allow clubs to trade players wherever they want.

Even it out giving clubs some control back

Perfect, love it.

They do it in the USA.

Wages are going up plenty, no excuse not to be able to move interstate for a little while.

Your knowledge of USA sports and no trade clauses is obviously limited

Oh really? Elaborate?

My understanding is that player consent is not required in the NBA. They are considered 'assets' contracted to a franchise.

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5278
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Said it before so many times

The AFL's F/A system too heavily favours the players it is not a fair system

So...

Get rid of the compo and allow clubs to trade players wherever they want.

Even it out giving clubs some control back

Perfect, love it.

They do it in the USA.

Wages are going up plenty, no excuse not to be able to move interstate for a little while.

Your knowledge of USA sports and no trade clauses is obviously limited

Oh really? Elaborate?

My understanding is that player consent is not required in the NBA. They are considered 'assets' contracted to a franchise.

Full no trade clauses in the NBA are rarer than in the other USA sports, but do happen, Bradley Beal was a genuine problem for the Suns after his play declined because he didn't want to be traded. But many players have one year veto options.

No trade clauses are more common in NHL, even allowing players to sign into contracts teams they would be willing to be traded to in the future. They can even have written into contracts that they cant be sent to the minors (regardless of poor play).

Anyway, back to the NBA. Players have PLENTY of power and often manipulate their way into creating "super teams". It's fantastic that the Thunder and Pistons are topping their conferences through years of pain and drafting young talent, as opposed to having players creating teams. In the NBA, once a player demands a trade, it's not if, it's when he gets traded.