Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Why don't we go left field on this and get a hard nut and a fringe player who won't be missed even if he gets heavily suspended and get him to knock the football mercenary out cold much like Cowboy Neale on Peter Hudson in the 1971 GF.No Judd and no Stevens should equate to a Tiger victory.If we can reminisce with glee on Balmey's antics on Southby Waite and co in 1973 why should this be any different. Its only against the scum and a good start is imperative.Do anything to win. That should dictate to everybody we won't be anybody's whipping boys and put a smile to Old Tigers' facres who used to bellow Eat Em Alive back in the Day.If people are too horrified by my summation then Jacko gets first crack.
I would like to see Jackson get him at the bounce and try to nullify his possessions, then have Tuck run with him one on one. Tuck plays very tall and is bigger than Judd, just a thought.
Quote from: WA Tiger on March 23, 2009, 08:20:23 PMI would like to see Jackson get him at the bounce and try to nullify his possessions, then have Tuck run with him one on one. Tuck plays very tall and is bigger than Judd, just a thought.Tuck is nowhere near accountable enough. The most successful opponents against Judd wear him like a glove and negate him. With Johnson out, Jackson is our next best option and I'm not sure if we have an adequate 3rd option.
I know nothing about football, nothing what soever.
Yes, I am stupid.
Jackson or King
Does Tuck need to be accountable if he is beating him to the ball and winning it???