Sure this is shaking things up a bit, which is exactly what’s needed, and hasn’t happened in the past, because some were scared that if anyone so much as breathed it could disrupt everything. But there’s a difference between a distraction caused by a disgruntled few wanting change for their own gratification and a review by those in charge. And hopefully that’s what this is.......
So, basically, if this is handled properly and professionally, I don’t see how this whole thing could signify anything but positive and progressive change.
In principle I agree with what you are saying TS, however what I've underlined is what concerns me...
It has been well documented that there have benn people in the background that have been rumbling for the last 18 months. They would appear to be the "disgruntled". They got digruntled and then suddenly we seem to running around reviewing.
Until this point most things were being kept in house, then suddenly we have the events of the last few months that have been anything but professional.
As I said on another post at the moment it looks like amatuer hour at the local under 12's
I have no problems with the idea it is the execution that's been the issue ....
I am all for reviews because yes that it is what the baord is there for but
i dont understand willie p
execution? there has been no execution of anything yet, other than miller getting sacked. And to be honest that was a huge storm in a tea cup. Miller should have gone 2 years ago, great bloke, finished as a football administrator, much like sheedy, minus the great bloke bit
March managed miller off the board, and then sacked him, it took a while, but he got the job done.
March has also put wallet back in his box, and got him to concentrate on what he is being paid to do...coach
Now march will shortly appoint an outstanding candidate to manange the five new departments of the football division, terrys boss.
These are all very important changes, people have been sacked, others have been moved sidewards, others have lost their powerbase and finally Craig Cameron and the new head hincho have been given new responsibilities. There is no way this could have been done without some egos being bruised, and without a bit of fallout. Ultimately the question has to be asked, is the RFC better off with the changes being made? The answer is YES.
Gary March has been superb under the circumstances. Very difficult job to do, full of minefields, and politically savvy football people trying to undermine him ( Wallace ) at every opportunity. Thankfully for us, he has had the balls to stay true to what had to be done, and there is no doubt we are all gunna be much better for it