Author Topic: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)  (Read 8533 times)

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4261
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #105 on: October 01, 2009, 10:00:20 PM »
who knows, McMahon may put on 10kgs and actually start tackling!

All jokes aside, if he does stay, regardless of the past Hardwick will not tolerate players who do not put their bodies on the line and win their own ball. So if Jordy fails to change this part of his game he will spend a year playing for the Burgers before being delisted.

I hope the Saints change their mind and take him  :pray

Stripes

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5293
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #106 on: October 01, 2009, 10:28:08 PM »
who knows, McMahon may put on 10kgs and actually start tackling!

All jokes aside, if he does stay, regardless of the past Hardwick will not tolerate players who do not put their bodies on the line and win their own ball. So if Jordy fails to change this part of his game he will spend a year playing for the Burgers before being delisted.

I hope the Saints change their mind and take him  :pray

Stripes


i hope so to!

 :)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95683
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #107 on: October 06, 2009, 03:42:34 AM »
ST KILDA

Both Brett Peake and Jordan McMahon have been raised in discussions.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/trade-week-day-one/story-e6frf9if-1225783117907



Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #108 on: October 06, 2009, 07:32:57 AM »
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #109 on: October 06, 2009, 11:56:48 AM »
I wonder if StKilda would be interested in Tuck to replace Luke Ball now he's requested a trade

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5293
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #110 on: October 06, 2009, 11:59:42 AM »
Shane Tuck & Jordan McMahon -----> Third Round Pick.

 :pray

Gordon Bennett

  • Guest
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #111 on: October 06, 2009, 12:13:41 PM »
Shane Tuck & Jordan McMahon -----> Third Round Pick.

 :pray
Both for StKilda's pick 48? That's ridiculous.

Offline the_boy_jake

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1770
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #112 on: October 06, 2009, 12:19:36 PM »
Shane Tuck & Jordan McMahon -----> Third Round Pick.

 :pray
Both for StKilda's pick 48? That's ridiculous.

Is it? Given what McMahon is being paid and that he may well be playing next season at Coburg then I read that trade as effectively Shane Tuck for pick 48. I'd rather 32, but would take 48.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #113 on: October 06, 2009, 12:34:34 PM »
Shane Tuck & Jordan McMahon -----> Third Round Pick.

 :pray
Both for StKilda's pick 48? That's ridiculous.

Pick 48 for Tuck would be about his value in this trade - we are throwing in McMahon as a free 'upsize'. 

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #114 on: October 06, 2009, 12:59:52 PM »
Shane Tuck & Jordan McMahon -----> Third Round Pick.

 :pray
Both for StKilda's pick 48? That's ridiculous.

I dont often agree with you GB but on this occasion I am in ageeance with your point of view.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58063
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #115 on: October 08, 2009, 07:00:57 PM »
What picks do the Saints have now? Would we swap McMahon for pick 60 they received for offloading Xavier Clarke?
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #116 on: October 08, 2009, 07:12:41 PM »
I have a loss of memory, :lol what pick did the "'geniuses"'at punt road give up for this clown in the first place? :banghead

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1729
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #117 on: October 08, 2009, 07:41:22 PM »
Saints have pick 32 still.  We could upgrade either pick 44 or 51 to that.

Can you put a sock in it for a change, Jackstar?  Wallace is gone.  Miller is gone.  King, Royal and Rawlings are gone.  Stop bringing up negatives all the time.  New start.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #118 on: October 08, 2009, 07:53:09 PM »
I have a loss of memory, :lol what pick did the "'geniuses"'at punt road give up for this clown in the first place? :banghead

McMahon the biggest blunder of the decade  :rollin never had 1/4 of Bowdens skill to replace him  ;D

Offline TFL

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
Re: St Kilda wants McMahon (Australian)
« Reply #119 on: October 08, 2009, 09:57:22 PM »
If they offered 60 we should take it in a flash.