« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8   Go Down

Author Topic: How did we rate Richmond's draft?  (Read 7728 times)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #75 on: November 25, 2012, 06:05:21 AM »
A crystal ball :lol
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #76 on: November 25, 2012, 06:18:51 AM »
Logged

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #77 on: November 25, 2012, 10:04:26 AM »
Beanpole project ruck men worry me.  McBean better bulk up soon.  I wouldn't play him much first year, I'd put him in the gym for a 12 month pre season bulk up, with skill sessions in between.
Logged

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #78 on: November 25, 2012, 10:29:22 AM »
Choco's first crop

Logged

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #79 on: November 25, 2012, 10:59:04 AM »
Theres no hurry for Mcbean to bulk up, Ivan and Ty can carry the load for some time yet,and theres always that great chest mark Derrykx to fill the void
Logged

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #80 on: November 25, 2012, 11:14:15 AM »
Elton, too.(197cm)
Logged

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #81 on: November 25, 2012, 12:16:43 PM »
Quote from: bojangles17 on November 25, 2012, 06:05:21 AM
A crystal ball :lol

 :lol solid comeback is solid.  :bow
Logged

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #82 on: November 25, 2012, 01:40:53 PM »
Quote from: tidyman on November 25, 2012, 10:04:26 AM
Beanpole project ruck men worry me.  McBean better bulk up soon.  I wouldn't play him much first year, I'd put him in the gym for a 12 month pre season bulk up, with skill sessions in between.

yeah, like man mountains such as Gus are a heaps better choice ::)
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #83 on: November 25, 2012, 06:24:10 PM »
Was Cameron Ling FF as a junior?
Logged

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13184
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #84 on: November 25, 2012, 06:32:01 PM »
Quote from: Yeahright on November 25, 2012, 06:24:10 PM
Was Cameron Ling FF as a junior?

Dunno but he has always been a ranga
Logged

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #85 on: November 25, 2012, 08:11:43 PM »
Were there any potential A grade players from our draftees. To be honest I dont see any. I see Vlastuin as having a B grade ceiling, McIntosh a C+/B grade ceiling, McDonough a C grade ceiling, McBean a C+ grade ceiling. Collingwood got Grundy and Kennedy who will be A grade players in their system and Broomhead a B grade ceiling player.
Logged

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #86 on: November 25, 2012, 08:55:56 PM »
Quote from: Rampstar on November 25, 2012, 08:11:43 PM
Were there any potential A grade players from our draftees. To be honest I dont see any. I see Vlastuin as having a B grade ceiling, McIntosh a C+/B grade ceiling, McDonough a C grade ceiling, McBean a C+ grade ceiling. Collingwood got Grundy and Kennedy who will be A grade players in their system and Broomhead a B grade ceiling player.
With all due respect, with the same logic you would have given Michael Voss a B grade ceiling too using the same criteria!
Logged
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #87 on: November 25, 2012, 09:36:32 PM »
Quote from: bojangles17 on November 25, 2012, 01:40:53 PM
Quote from: tidyman on November 25, 2012, 10:04:26 AM
Beanpole project ruck men worry me.  McBean better bulk up soon.  I wouldn't play him much first year, I'd put him in the gym for a 12 month pre season bulk up, with skill sessions in between.

yeah, like man mountains such as Gus are a heaps better choice ::)

But beanpoles like Pattison are good :O.  The game is even more collision based than when we took Pattison,   McBeanpole better work hard.
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95683
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #88 on: November 25, 2012, 10:20:29 PM »
Quote from: Yeahright on November 25, 2012, 06:24:10 PM
Was Cameron Ling FF as a junior?
Yep he was.

Footballers can end up playing in a surprisingly different position on the ground in senior footy compared to where they played in their junior days. Michael Roach for instance was a wingman when he was first recruited.
Logged

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #89 on: November 25, 2012, 10:54:59 PM »
Quote from: YellowandBlackBlood on November 25, 2012, 08:55:56 PM
Quote from: Rampstar on November 25, 2012, 08:11:43 PM
Were there any potential A grade players from our draftees. To be honest I dont see any. I see Vlastuin as having a B grade ceiling, McIntosh a C+/B grade ceiling, McDonough a C grade ceiling, McBean a C+ grade ceiling. Collingwood got Grundy and Kennedy who will be A grade players in their system and Broomhead a B grade ceiling player.
With all due respect, with the same logic you would have given Michael Voss a B grade ceiling too using the same criteria!

With all due respect this is a forum and if I wanna post crap then I will post crap and if it works out for me I will come back and claim to have picked it 100% if my rankings dont work out I will just come back and say its just an internet forum and it doesnt matter. Thats how we roll on OER... no responsibility is taken for stupidity  ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8   Go Up
« previous next »