Author Topic: All-Australian Tigers?  (Read 14936 times)

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: All-Australian Tigers?
« Reply #60 on: September 20, 2011, 08:48:30 AM »
Luke Darcy who I am assuming is a selector said last night (One Week at A Time) that Petrie has been selected as the 2nd/ruckman forward  :o

As I said funny stuff

I have no idea how Luke Darcy is held in such high regard.

That crap he spouted about Leading Teams and the Bulldogs was embarrassing. He writes dumb-ass articles on AFL.com.au and he's in charge of picking the best players for the year??!!  >:(
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: All-Australian Tigers?
« Reply #61 on: September 21, 2011, 12:07:30 AM »
What hurts Lids' chances in these awards is he is moreso a highly consistent performer rather than someone who stands out as a clear matchwinner. Even within the Tiges' list we can think of games where Jack won games off his own boot kicking a bag and taking speckies, Dusty destroying North (round 5) and Melbourne as a goalkicking midfielder who can go forward, and of course Cotch's class in the midfield winning stacks of clearances. Lids on the other hand will cop criticism because he's a HBFer. Lids has had many top games such as beating Goddard head-to-head in the draw but probably because we need to use him as HBF, commentators and judges in these awards who go by a 'wow-factor' overlook him. That's why I think Robert Murphy, who can kick a freakish goal and have a day out now and then, got in the AA side ahead of better and more consistent years from Lids and Scotland.

Same goes with Petrie - his speckies stand out in a mediocre and evenly mundane side.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: All-Australian Tigers?
« Reply #62 on: September 21, 2011, 07:46:25 AM »
I think a lot of supporters fall into the trap of making that mistake with LIds too MT.

He doesn't dominate games as we think someone of his ability should, but he has a major influence of HB with his elite disposal, it's just not speccy.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: All-Australian Tigers?
« Reply #63 on: September 27, 2011, 03:59:55 AM »
All Australian side Brownlow votes:

B: Scarlett 3          Glass 0        Enright 3

HB: R.Murphy 4          Reid  1        Davis 4

C:  Thomas 10       Mitchell 30    Pendlebury  24   
 
HF: M.Murphy 19       Cloke 13        Swan  34

F: Milne  5           Franklin 20      Goodes  19

R: Cox   18      Judd  23       Ablett  23

Int: Boyd 24,   Dal Santo  28,    Kelly  6,   Petrie  11

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: All-Australian Tigers?
« Reply #64 on: September 27, 2011, 01:21:47 PM »
All Australian side Brownlow votes:

B: Scarlett 3          Glass 0        Enright 3

HB: R.Murphy 4          Reid  1        Davis 4

C:  Thomas 10       Mitchell 30    Pendlebury  24   
 
HF: M.Murphy 19       Cloke 13        Swan  34

F: Milne  5           Franklin 20      Goodes  19

R: Cox   18      Judd  23       Ablett  23

Int: Boyd 24,   Dal Santo  28,    Kelly  6,   Petrie  11

Good to see the umps rewarding defenders  :lol  A total of 15 votes combined

Who was the highest polling defender in the Brownlow ?
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos