At draft time yes, the year before when people started doing preliminary rankings of the U18 players for the year, Schulz was considered a #1 pick contender. He was massively underaged compared to the others and had shown quite a bit the year before as a kpp. He never had the same impact in the year he was eligible to be drafted, but was still taken high based off his reputation from the year before. Similar to the Clarke example used where he was considered a monty for the #1 pick in the preseason.