Fevola [merged]

[one-eyed]

Fevola issue exposes AFL's sheer hypocrisy
Caroline Wilson | November 8, 2009

The gifted but wayward forward is the league's whipping boy - and key promotional tool.

THE unfinished business that exists between Brendan Fevola and the AFL is starting to reek of hypocrisy.

Full story here:
http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/fevola-hypocrisy/2009/11/07/1257247793117.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

[crannyvegas]

Good article by Caro!! It is business though and they are always going to seek the biggest profit margins. The same was done by the TV networks building up our West Coast games this year. Everyone loves a bit of theatre being involved in a game.


Having said that, profiting of an alledged sexual assualt doesn't sit well with my moral compass.

[mightytiges]

Fev has the known intellect of a 10 year old for taking and sending out the photo to every tom, dick and harry in the first place, but you've got to love the rep. of Woman's Day last night saying it was okay for them to publish the Bingle photo because it was already doing the rounds in footy and cricket circles. Then NINE news dob in Dylan Howard as the one who gave the photo to Woman's Day. Apparently Howard had a falling out with Hutchy who of course works for NINE. Class acts all round  .

[Penelope]

For what it's worth, a couple of posters on BF reckon these pics are a couple of years old.

Although Fev may have took the initial pic, he only needs to have sent it to one person and that person could have been responsible for sending to a wider audience. Doesnt excuse fev for doing that in the first place but no knows for sure his intent was for it to go to as many people as possible

[mightytiges]

For what it's worth, a couple of posters on BF reckon these pics are a couple of years old.

Although Fev may have took the initial pic, he only needs to have sent it to one person and that person could have been responsible for sending to a wider audience. Doesnt excuse fev for doing that in the first place but no knows for sure his intent was for it to go to as many people as possible

Mike last night on 3aw said the pic had been around for 3 years apparently. He said something along the lines of someone else (not Fev) must be trying to embarrass Bingle by bringing up the photo now. Somehow linked to some public dispute between Bingle and Michael Clarke allegedly at the cricket here before the Aussies headed over to NZ. It was just gossip so I wasn't paying too much attention to what Mike was saying. It's hard enough paying attention to Mike when he's talking about footy let alone other goss lol.

[one-eyed]

Fev claims the phone was lost at Newy's place......

Bingle has claimed the photo was taken without her consent. Fevola, questioned by the AFL's new manager of integrity Brett Clothier, claimed she agreed to it and had not asked him to delete it.

The 27-year-old also claimed the mobile in question - not his main telephone but a pre-paid phone - was lost after being left at the home of his friend and fellow footballer Richmond captain Chris Newman. There is no suggestion Newman had any involvement in the saga.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/tainted-fevolas-victims-pile-up-20100303-pizo.html

[wayne]

For what it's worth, a couple of posters on BF reckon these pics are a couple of years old.

Although Fev may have took the initial pic, he only needs to have sent it to one person and that person could have been responsible for sending to a wider audience. Doesnt excuse fev for doing that in the first place but no knows for sure his intent was for it to go to as many people as possible

I have heard that as well al. If the affair was a couple of years ago, the photo must be that vintage as well.

Now that it's been brought into the public eye, I reckon every second person has it on their mobile now.

[mightytiges]

The AFL had their chance to punish Fev after the Brownlow incident. No point them being angry now behind the scenes because all they can do now is ban him from a Lions promotional video.

[Penelope]

Bingle has claimed the photo was taken without her consent.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/tainted-fevolas-victims-pile-up-20100303-pizo.html

I wonder if Ms Bingle had Fev's wife's consent to even be in a position for the photo to be taken in the first place?

[jackstar is back again]

For what it's worth, a couple of posters on BF reckon these pics are a couple of years old.

Although Fev may have took the initial pic, he only needs to have sent it to one person and that person could have been responsible for sending to a wider audience. Doesnt excuse fev for doing that in the first place but no knows for sure his intent was for it to go to as many people as possible

Photos are 3 years old, and there is more than one

[mightytiges]

Bingle has claimed the photo was taken without her consent.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/tainted-fevolas-victims-pile-up-20100303-pizo.html

I wonder if Ms Bingle had Fev's wife's consent to even be in a position for the photo to be taken in the first place?

Bingle's side of the story is she didn't know at first that Fev was married until she heard Alex and Fev's kids in the background when she rang him 4-5 weeks into the affair. Given the Fevolas were in the public eye (hello Footy Show and past Brownlow nights) it's kind of odd she didn't know.

Bingle's selling her side of the story to Woman's Day for $200k btw  .

[Chuck17]

If the phone was lost at Newy's place maybe Jordie could be implicated as the culprit and action taken by the RFC to sack for bringing the game into disrepute

[wayne]

If the phone was lost at Newy's place maybe Jordie could be implicated as the culprit and action taken by the RFC to sack for bringing the game into disrepute

lol 

[one-eyed]

No one here probably cares lol but ACA tonight says Clarke has split up with Bingle.

[bushranger]

I got on the computer when that came on about them two.
They are just like a lot of people splitting up.
And we don't care about them, so why start now.