« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 22   Go Down

Author Topic: Schulz to Port  (Read 54220 times)

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13896
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #15 on: October 06, 2009, 10:06:25 PM »
Quote from: Jackstar is back on October 06, 2009, 09:50:40 PM
Can tell you  all,get the champagne out.
DEAL CONFIRMED ! :cheers

Jack you better not be kidding pal im about to pop open a bottle of Moet.

This is fantastic news for the club and i couldnt care less about the pick, thats just a bonus.
Logged
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #16 on: October 06, 2009, 10:06:46 PM »
Mate, only tell you what I have been told, been confirmed by Port not by Richmond ;)
Straight swap.
Logged

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #17 on: October 06, 2009, 10:14:09 PM »
We should look to upgrade pick 67 to 56, or 44 to 40.
Logged

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13896
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #18 on: October 06, 2009, 10:15:31 PM »
perfect. not happy on this farmer swap, probably another dud but if it means i dont have to see Schulz again then im happy.
Logged
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline 1980

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #19 on: October 06, 2009, 10:16:29 PM »
good riddance to schulz.

does harwick know farmer from his time at port or is this a case of anyone is better than schulz??
Logged

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #20 on: October 06, 2009, 10:18:39 PM »
Quote from: daniel161 on October 06, 2009, 10:15:31 PM
perfect. not happy on this farmer swap, probably another dud but if it means i dont have to see Schulz again then im happy.

Maybe we got a pick upgrade?
Logged

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #21 on: October 06, 2009, 10:19:42 PM »
Schulz + 35 for Farmer + 24 is what somebody is saying on Bigfooty.  That would be amazing.
Logged

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2009, 10:24:54 PM »
Quote from: Danog on October 06, 2009, 10:19:42 PM
Schulz + 35 for Farmer + 24 is what somebody is saying on Bigfooty.  That would be amazing.

That would be an outstanding result. The 11 pick upgrade would be fantastic if true.
Logged

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2009, 10:26:59 PM »
Why must trade week happen during the week I have a major economics assignment due?  4pm tomorrow.  :-\
Logged

Offline jezza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2009, 10:32:21 PM »
Quote from: Danog on October 06, 2009, 10:19:42 PM
Schulz + 35 for Farmer + 24 is what somebody is saying on Bigfooty.  That would be amazing.

That would be very nice indeed
Logged

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #25 on: October 06, 2009, 10:40:58 PM »
im happy to get mitch farmer and lose schulz.
hoping we get to upgrade our picks to through it all.
Logged

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7351
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #26 on: October 06, 2009, 10:49:29 PM »
20 Yr old still unknown for a 24 Yr old proven failure  :thumbsup
To upgrade the pick aswell, I may buy a tatts ticket.
Logged

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #27 on: October 06, 2009, 10:53:26 PM »
Quote from: CUB on October 06, 2009, 10:49:29 PM
20 Yr old still unknown for a 24 Yr old proven failure  :thumbsup
To upgrade the pick aswell, I may buy a tatts ticket.

Fantastic result if true. Please don't let this be a mirage in the desert. :pray
Logged

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5329
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #28 on: October 06, 2009, 11:00:14 PM »
take a draft pick.

mates who played with Farmer said he hasn't got the right attitude, to small, fact!

however, i think if it is a straight swap or Jay Schulz, it isn't that bad getting a small back/forward pocket player aged 20-21 years old.

but ... we don't need another small player!

 :)
Logged

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #29 on: October 06, 2009, 11:40:30 PM »
Quote from: torch on October 06, 2009, 11:00:14 PM
take a draft pick.

mates who played with Farmer said he hasn't got the right attitude, to small, fact!

however, i think if it is a straight swap or Jay Schulz, it isn't that bad getting a small back/forward pocket player aged 20-21 years old.

but ... we don't need another small player!

 :)

a couple of our current smaller players arent up to it and none of them can control opposition small forwards. farmer has to be given a chance.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 22   Go Up
« previous next »