Author Topic: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading  (Read 106812 times)

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5646
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #165 on: May 06, 2014, 12:15:53 PM »

WTF  :huh

QCoal's James Mackay developing environmental policy for Newman Government in Queensland

By the National Reporting Team's Mark Solomons and Mark Willacy

The head of corporate affairs for a mining company at the centre of an environmental dispute has been in charge of developing policy on the environment for Queensland's ruling Liberal National Party (LNP) since 2012.

James Mackay also worked full-time for the LNP during the 2012 election, while he was being paid $10,000 a month by the company, QCoal.

QCoal is embroiled in controversy over plans to divert Coral Creek in north Queensland to mine the coal underneath.
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #166 on: May 20, 2014, 11:34:04 AM »
Hottest May

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #167 on: June 03, 2014, 03:37:47 AM »
THE Obama administration today plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.

The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama's campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.

http://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/president-barack-obama-to-announce-rules-on-limiting-carbon-emissions/story-e6frfm30-1226939857328


I'll wait to see what is actually set-up over the next two years in the States but nevertheless so much for Australia acting alone and other countries doing nothing to limit their CO2 emissions. The world is moving towards global carbon pricing whether our Government wants to believe it or not. 
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #168 on: June 03, 2014, 07:37:38 AM »
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2258.html

ARTICLE PREVIEW
view full access options

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE |
Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model


The intensification of precipitation extremes with climate change1 is of key importance to society as a result of the large impact through flooding. Observations show that heavy rainfall is increasing on daily timescales in many regions2, but how changes will manifest themselves on sub-daily timescales remains highly uncertain. Here we perform the first climate change experiments with a very high resolution (1.5 km grid spacing) model more typically used for weather forecasting, in this instance for a region of the UK. The model simulates realistic hourly rainfall characteristics, including extremes3, 4, unlike coarser resolution climate models5, 6, giving us confidence in its ability to project future changes at this timescale. We find the 1.5 km model shows increases in hourly rainfall intensities in winter, consistent with projections from a coarser 12 km resolution model and previous studies at the daily timescale7. However, the 1.5 km model also shows a future intensification of short-duration rain in summer, with significantly more events exceeding the high thresholds indicative of serious flash flooding. We conclude that accurate representation of the local storm dynamics is an essential requirement for predicting changes to convective extremes; when included we find for the model here that summer downpours intensify with warming.

At a glance
Figures
First | 1-4 of 4 | Last
left

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4
right


References• Author information• Supplementary information
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M. & Parsons, D. B. The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1205–1217 (2003).
ADSISIArticle
Min, S-K., Zhang, X., Zwiers, F. W. & Hegerl, G. C. Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470, 376–379 (2011).
CASADSArticle
Kendon, E. J., Roberts, N. M., Senior, C. A. & Roberts, M. J. Realism of rainfall in a very high resolution regional climate model. J. Clim. 25, 5791–5806 (2012).
Article
Chan, S. C. et al. The value of high-resolution Met Office regional climate models in the simulation of multi-hourly precipitation extremes. J. Clim. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00723.1 (in the press).
Hanel, M. & Buishand, T. A. On the value of hourly precipitation extremes in regional climate model simulations. J. Hydrol. 393, 265–273 (2010).
Article
Gregersen, I. B. et al. Assessing future climatic changes of rainfall extremes at small spatio-temporal scales. Climatic Change 118, 783–797 (2013).
Article
Fowler, H. J. & Ekström, M. Multi-model ensemble estimates of climate change impacts on UK seasonal precipitation extremes. Int. J. Climatol. 29, 385–416 (2009).
Article
Lenderink, G. & van Meijgaard, E. Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nature Geosci. 1, 511–514 (2008).
CASADSISIArticle
Burt, S. Cloudburst upon Hendraburnick Down: The Boscastle storm of 16 August 2004. Weather 60, 219–227 (2005).
ADSArticle
Berg, P., Moseley, C. & Haerter, J. O. Strong increase in convective precipitation in response to higher temperatures. Nature Geosci. 6, 181–185 (2013).
CASADSArticle
Brockhaus, P., Lüthi, D. & Schär, C. Aspects of the diurnal cycle in a regional climate model. Meteorol. Z. 17, 433–443 (2008).
Article
Hohenegger, C., Brockhaus, P. & Schär, C. Towards climate simulations at cloud-resolving scales. Meteorol. Z. 17, 383–394 (2008).
Article
Lean, H. W. et al. Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Weath. Rev. 136, 3408–3424 (2008).
ADSArticle
Langhans, W., Schmidli, J., Fuhrer, O., Bieri, S. & Schär, C. Long-term simulations of thermally driven flows and orographic convection at convection-parameterizing and cloud-resolving resolutions. J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim. 52, 1490–1510 (2013).
Article
Prein, A. F. et al. Added value of convection permitting seasonal simulations. Clim. Dynam. 41, 2655–2677 (2013).
ADSArticle
Mahoney, K., Alexander, M., Scott, J. D. & Barsugli, J. High-resolution downscaled simulations of warm-season extreme precipitation events in the Colorado Front Range under past and future climates. J. Clim. 26, 8671–8689 (2013).
Article
Attema, J. J., Loriaux, J. M. & Lenderink, G. Extreme precipitation response to climate perturbations in an atmospheric mesoscale model. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 014003 (2014).
ADSArticle
Wakazuki, Y., Nakamura, M., Kanada, S. & Muroi, C. Climatological reproducibility evaluation and future climate projection of extreme precipitation events in the Baiu Season using a high-resolution non-hydrostatic RCM in comparison with an AGCM. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 86, 951–967 (2008).
Article
Knote, C., Heinemann, G. & Rockel, B. Changes in weather extremes: Assessment of return values using high resolution climate simulations at convection-resolving scale. Meteorol. Z. 19, 11–23 (2010).
Article
Trapp, R. J., Robinson, E. D., Baldwin, M. E., Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Schwedler, B. R. J. Regional climate of hazardous convective weather through high-resolution dynamical downscaling. Clim. Dynam. 37, 677–688 (2011).
ADSArticle
Hohenegger, C., Brockhaus, P., Bretherton, C. S. & Schär, C. The soil moisture-precipitation feedback in simulations with explicit and parameterized convection. J. Clim. 22, 5003–5020 (2009).
ISIArticle
Pan, L-L. et al. Influences of climate change on California and Nevada regions revealed by a high-resolution dynamical downscaling study. Clim. Dynam. 37, 2005–2020 (2011).
Article
Golding, B. W. Nimrod: A system for generating automated very short range forecasts. Meteorol. Appl. 5, 1–16 (1998).
ADSArticle
Harrison, D. L., Driscoll, S. J. & Kitchen, M. Improving precipitation estimates from weather radar using quality control and correction techniques. Meteorol. Appl. 7, 135–144 (2000).
ADSArticle
Walters, D. N. et al. The Met Office Unified Model global atmosphere 3.0/3.1 and JULES global land 3.0/3.1 configurations. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 919–941 (2011).
ADSArticle
Wilkinson, J. M. et al. Improved microphysical parametrization of drizzle and fog for operational forecasting using the Met Office Unifed Model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 139, 488–500 (2013).
Article
Li, D. & Shine, K. P. A 4-dimensional Ozone Climatology for UGAMP Models. Technical Report 35 (UGAMP 1995)
Collins, W. J. et al. Development and evaluation of an Earth-System model—HadGEM2. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 1051–1075 (2011).
Article
Bower, K. N. & Choularton, T. W. A parametrisation of the effective radius of ice free clouds for use in global climate models. Atmos. Res. 27, 305–339 (1992).
Article
Best, M. J. et al. The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description—Part 1: Energy and water fluxes. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 595–640 (2011).
Article

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #169 on: June 03, 2014, 07:40:04 AM »
THE Obama administration today plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.

The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama's campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.

http://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/president-barack-obama-to-announce-rules-on-limiting-carbon-emissions/story-e6frfm30-1226939857328


I'll wait to see what is actually set-up over the next two years in the States but nevertheless so much for Australia acting alone and other countries doing nothing to limit their CO2 emissions. The world is moving towards global carbon pricing whether our Government wants to believe it or not.

Carbon will be worth more than gold. I don't agree with pricing it but as long as the money is put towards the research and development of renewable energy then I'm all for it.

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #170 on: June 03, 2014, 11:20:56 AM »
THE Obama administration today plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.

The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama's campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.

http://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/president-barack-obama-to-announce-rules-on-limiting-carbon-emissions/story-e6frfm30-1226939857328


I'll wait to see what is actually set-up over the next two years in the States but nevertheless so much for Australia acting alone and other countries doing nothing to limit their CO2 emissions. The world is moving towards global carbon pricing whether our Government wants to believe it or not.

Carbon will be worth more than gold. I don't agree with pricing it but as long as the money is put towards the research and development of renewable energy then I'm all for it.
Says a man who doesn't go outside because the graphics suck.  ;D

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #171 on: June 03, 2014, 12:54:35 PM »
 ;D Too many noobs IRL too.

But seriously, carbon tax and ETS is fine as a way to raise revenue for development of clean and renewable energy, otherwise it's just something else for the filthy rich to exploit.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #172 on: June 03, 2014, 01:04:57 PM »
Real conservationists understand that addressing overpopulation is the only real solution - unless we do that, everything else is just useless feelgood crap and kicking shyte up a hill.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5646
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #173 on: June 03, 2014, 01:35:01 PM »
Real conservationists understand that addressing overpopulation is the only real solution - unless we do that, everything else is just useless feelgood crap and kicking shyte up a hill.

I like this idea.

Are we talking WW3 or The Black Death?

 :lol
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #174 on: June 03, 2014, 03:42:18 PM »
''In contrast to the fabulously rich, the enormously poor make little useful contribution to society,'' wrote Mr Ralph, a long-time Liberal Party campaign strategist.

Advertisement

''They consume more than they contribute, putting tremendous strain on the national budget.

''A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma. If the least productive 20 per cent of citizens were decommissioned it would directly release a recurrent $25 billion, which would almost cover overspending by the Gillard government between now and September 14th, assuming Mr Swan maintains his long-term average rate of profligacy.Kill the world a poorest 20%



dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #175 on: June 03, 2014, 04:44:04 PM »
Real conservationists understand that addressing overpopulation is the only real solution - unless we do that, everything else is just useless feelgood crap and kicking shyte up a hill.

This actually is the issue. Forests have always been the Earth's natural CO2 scrubbers and carbon levels rock from around 200ppm (most trees suffocate around 50ppm) to around 2000ppm. Currently around 800ppm. Over population has lead to massive deforestation, and the demand for resources is releasing even more greenhouse gas that was trapped under the Earth.

If things get too drastic we could always just pump sulfate aerosol into the atmosohere for a decade. Otherwise we can just wait until a combination of anti-biotic resistant super bugs and the come back of nasty viruses due to paranoid, new age anti-vaxxers to make a come back and serve mankind a well deserved and overdue culling.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #176 on: June 03, 2014, 09:04:45 PM »
THE Obama administration today plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.

The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama's campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.

http://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/president-barack-obama-to-announce-rules-on-limiting-carbon-emissions/story-e6frfm30-1226939857328


I'll wait to see what is actually set-up over the next two years in the States but nevertheless so much for Australia acting alone and other countries doing nothing to limit their CO2 emissions. The world is moving towards global carbon pricing whether our Government wants to believe it or not.

Carbon will be worth more than gold. I don't agree with pricing it but as long as the money is put towards the research and development of renewable energy then I'm all for it.
The value of a market price (as opposed to a fixed carbon price) will obviously depend on supply and demand depend on how industry and society moves to a less carbon intensive economy. The ETS will be a cap and trade system meaning there'll be a cap on the amount of collective CO2 produced (which will be lowered over time to bring down total emissions) and emitters will be required to buy/trade for permits to emit. If we reduce emissions faster than the cap then there will be a over-supply of permits and the cost of them will stay low; on the other hand if emitters struggle to collectively meet the cap then the cost of permits will rise and eventually it'll be cheaper to invest in and switch to alternative renewable energies rather than trade to buy more permits.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #177 on: June 03, 2014, 11:13:56 PM »
I know that's how they're meant to work, but without just sounding cynical I can see ETS permits being exploited since they can be traded. There will only ever be a set amount of permits due to the cap so if someone buys up more than they need they can then on sell them for a cost that they choose. I can't speak for the USA but if Australia were serious we would go nuclear in the mean time for major cities, with solar and wind/hydro in other regions, while the countries serious about investing in clean and renewable energy come up with the solution. There are still way too many people, including the government, getting rich from fossil fuels.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #178 on: June 04, 2014, 10:08:02 AM »
Real conservationists understand that addressing overpopulation is the only real solution - unless we do that, everything else is just useless feelgood crap and kicking shyte up a hill.

This is true, but.......

The back bone of capitalist economies is growth. For economic growth, you need population growth.

Even China realises this, which is why they have just changed their one child policy.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Contoversial Topic #1 - Global Warming & Carbon Emissions Trading
« Reply #179 on: June 04, 2014, 12:16:36 PM »
Can you explain how this is the case?

I understand capitalism was written pre industrialrrevolution. But this still seems bizarre