Author Topic: Ben Griffiths [merged]  (Read 529149 times)

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9974
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2655 on: July 11, 2015, 02:55:37 AM »
Actually missed Griff tonight. Nobody to take pack marks. Vickery was weak all night in attack.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2656 on: July 11, 2015, 09:48:28 AM »

Vickery was weak all night in attack.

I don't agree with that.  I thought Vickery's game was reasonable and he worked well when up forward and on the ball.

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2657 on: July 11, 2015, 10:08:12 AM »

Vickery was weak all night in attack.

I don't agree with that.  I thought Vickery's game was reasonable and he worked well when up forward and on the ball.

I agree, considering he had s tooth knocked out I though he held it together and played well all things considered....

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2658 on: July 11, 2015, 10:32:29 AM »
Vickery was very good no doubt about it  :clapping
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline peggles

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2659 on: July 11, 2015, 11:08:25 AM »
vickery got better as the game wore on.

Online Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2450
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2660 on: July 11, 2015, 11:13:21 AM »
Vickery was horrid most of the game. Last quarter he did some good stuff but that was it. Some of his "Marking Attempts" well Im not sure how to describe them.

But this thread is about Griff and we did miss him tonight, as Hardwick said in his post match. He straightens them up. Hope he is back soon.
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2661 on: July 11, 2015, 11:15:52 AM »
I've liked him since he came back in the side, he gets involved in the game for longer periods now and has more impact, rather than the typical 1-2 cheapies in junk time, he demands the ball and clunks some big grabs now. Liking his ruck work

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2662 on: July 11, 2015, 11:17:18 AM »
hardly a night for tall forwards last night

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2663 on: July 11, 2015, 02:07:30 PM »
Delay his return and get him primed for finals when conditions are generally dryer and better suited for talls :shh

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2664 on: July 11, 2015, 02:31:28 PM »
I would like:

Griff chb.  Tell him to kick it 80 metres

Chaplin out


Astbury or McKenzie. Or mcbean. Fwd
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2665 on: July 11, 2015, 02:53:14 PM »
I would like:

Griff chb.  Tell him to kick it 80 metres


That worked so well last time ::)

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2666 on: July 11, 2015, 02:59:27 PM »
I would like:

Griff chb.  Tell him to kick it 80 metres


That worked so well last time ::)

Chaplin ain't working now son
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2667 on: July 11, 2015, 03:09:27 PM »
Like it or not, despite all his deficiencies, he is providing us with something that no one else has shown they can and that's being our 2nd tall back who can hold his own (at times).

Definitely need an upgrade though

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9974
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #2668 on: July 12, 2015, 12:25:12 AM »
Chaplin is doing enough.

Anybody who thought Vickery was effective when isolated in the F50 was clearly fondling themselves instead of watching the game. He was weak, slow and disinterested for about 80% of the night.

Needed Griffiths. He's a better pack mark.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98238
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Which players are missing most in front of goal at your club in 2015?

Lauren Wood
Herald-Sun
July 22, 2015


Who are the culprits when it comes to wastefulness at your club? You know, the blokes that leave you with your heart in your mouth every time they have a shot at the big sticks.

With the help of the stats experts at Champion Data, we’ve analysed players from every club who have had 20 or more shots at goal this season for the lowest return.

You might be surprised by the results.

RICHMOND

Ben Griffiths


Games — 11

Return — 12.10 from 28 shots

Accuracy — 43%

http://www.news.com.au/national/which-players-are-missing-most-in-front-of-goal-at-your-club-in-2015/story-e6frfkp9-1227452593075