Author Topic: Matt Dea [merged]  (Read 153383 times)

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1185 on: May 25, 2016, 01:08:09 PM »
Dea >>>


Houli
Bach
Chappy
Morris
Hunt
Agreed. Not one of those guys has any up side and yet we delist Dea.
Anyway it's history now but I still hope he sticks it up Dimma's arse.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 11:06:57 PM by big tone »

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1186 on: May 25, 2016, 01:30:11 PM »
I'd be guessing Y&BB would be alluding to the fact that Dea isn't a solve for our list gaps down back.

It's rather obvious Dea isn't a key back given his size

Yet he can play tall ...

As opposed to troy.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 02:42:06 PM by WilliamPowell »
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1187 on: May 25, 2016, 02:37:45 PM »
Dea >>>


Houli
Bach
Chappy
Morris
Hunt
Agreed. Not of of those guys has any up side and yet we delist Dea.
Anyway it's history now but I still hope he sticks it up Dimma's arse.

You could throw a blanket over all of them although I'd say Houli is the best of that lot.
It doesn't make Dea the answer nor does it justify keeping the others.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9929
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1188 on: May 25, 2016, 03:22:14 PM »
Dea was a bad de-listing.

Strong physique, great mark, courageous, good foot skills.

Said it before - great pickup by the Bombers. Deserves his chance and is making the most of it. All he needed was a good consistent run of games that blokes like Vickery were gifted.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14022
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1189 on: May 25, 2016, 05:21:01 PM »
Dea was a bad de-listing.

Strong physique, great mark, courageous, good foot skills.

Said it before - great pickup by the Bombers. Deserves his chance and is making the most of it. All he needed was a good consistent run of games that blokes like Vickery were gifted.

dont stop at vickery. Grigg, Edwards the lot of them were average in the early days and some still are, yet were given a great run at it.

Can someone tell me how many consecutive games Dea was given at our club.

Not saying he will end up a great find by the bombers but stuff his better than about 6 of them we have playing seniors now
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1190 on: May 25, 2016, 09:33:30 PM »
Dea was a bad de-listing.

Strong physique, great mark, courageous, good foot skills.

Said it before - great pickup by the Bombers. Deserves his chance and is making the most of it. All he needed was a good consistent run of games that blokes like Vickery were gifted.

25 games in 6 years with average of 10 touches.
A good de-listing, we just don't get rid of enough of these under performers quickly enough
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline DCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
  • Belle, Richmond PR manager
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1191 on: May 25, 2016, 09:53:56 PM »
Has come on well, we should offer Essendon a 2nd round draft pick for him.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1192 on: May 25, 2016, 10:12:06 PM »
The idea he could have replaced chaplin is not too far off the mark, if you understand what we recruited chaplin for.
BT is on the money with half (most?) of what chaplin does
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9929
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1193 on: May 25, 2016, 10:47:08 PM »
Dea was a bad de-listing.

Strong physique, great mark, courageous, good foot skills.

Said it before - great pickup by the Bombers. Deserves his chance and is making the most of it. All he needed was a good consistent run of games that blokes like Vickery were gifted.

25 games in 6 years with average of 10 touches.
A good de-listing, we just don't get rid of enough of these under performers quickly enough

Crap post, typical junk about statistics.

Was our VFL B&F for 2015 yet didn't manage a single game at AFL level since mid-2014 despite deserving it. At least the Bombers could see the form he was in and picked him up.

If you care so much about stats he's averaging about 15 touches and 8.5 marks this year. Very serviceable compared to the likes of Taylor Hunt. Harder man too.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1194 on: May 25, 2016, 11:10:16 PM »
Dea was a bad de-listing.

Strong physique, great mark, courageous, good foot skills.

Said it before - great pickup by the Bombers. Deserves his chance and is making the most of it. All he needed was a good consistent run of games that blokes like Vickery were gifted.

25 games in 6 years with average of 10 touches.
A good de-listing, we just don't get rid of enough of these under performers quickly enough
How are Astbury and Batchelor going in the stats department?

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1195 on: May 25, 2016, 11:19:33 PM »
Dea was a bad de-listing.

Strong physique, great mark, courageous, good foot skills.

Said it before - great pickup by the Bombers. Deserves his chance and is making the most of it. All he needed was a good consistent run of games that blokes like Vickery were gifted.

25 games in 6 years with average of 10 touches.
A good de-listing, we just don't get rid of enough of these under performers quickly enough

Crap post, typical junk about statistics.

Was our VFL B&F for 2015 yet didn't manage a single game at AFL level since mid-2014 despite deserving it. At least the Bombers could see the form he was in and picked him up.

If you care so much about stats he's averaging about 15 touches and 8.5 marks this year. Very serviceable compared to the likes of Taylor Hunt. Harder man too.

 :clapping
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1196 on: May 25, 2016, 11:49:03 PM »
The idea he could have replaced chaplin is not too far off the mark, if you understand what we recruited chaplin for.
BT is on the money with half (most?) of what chaplin does
My memory of the recruitment of Chaplin was to help out Rance with the big gorilla forwards. At least that is what we were told initially.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1197 on: May 26, 2016, 12:07:05 AM »
The idea he could have replaced chaplin is not too far off the mark, if you understand what we recruited chaplin for.
BT is on the money with half (most?) of what chaplin does
My memory of the recruitment of Chaplin was to help out Rance with the big gorilla forwards. At least that is what we were told initially.

Yes that is my recollection also
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1198 on: May 26, 2016, 10:57:04 AM »
Dea was a bad de-listing.

Strong physique, great mark, courageous, good foot skills.

Said it before - great pickup by the Bombers. Deserves his chance and is making the most of it. All he needed was a good consistent run of games that blokes like Vickery were gifted.

25 games in 6 years with average of 10 touches.
A good de-listing, we just don't get rid of enough of these under performers quickly enough

Crap post, typical junk about statistics.

Was our VFL B&F for 2015 yet didn't manage a single game at AFL level since mid-2014 despite deserving it. At least the Bombers could see the form he was in and picked him up.

If you care so much about stats he's averaging about 15 touches and 8.5 marks this year. Very serviceable compared to the likes of Taylor Hunt. Harder man too.

 :clapping

Neither are good enough to play AFL standard over a long period of time. If he was AFL ready why was he picked up so late.
Good luck to him but I'm glad he was delisted last year, I'd hope they go deeper this year.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #1199 on: May 26, 2016, 01:25:58 PM »
The idea he could have replaced chaplin is not too far off the mark, if you understand what we recruited chaplin for.
BT is on the money with half (most?) of what chaplin does
My memory of the recruitment of Chaplin was to help out Rance with the big gorilla forwards. At least that is what we were told initially.

Yes that is my recollection also
that was the talk on this forum, but i dont believe the club ever said that.

That wasnt his role at Port either.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI