Author Topic: Ben Nason delisted [updated]  (Read 33442 times)

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #135 on: July 16, 2011, 05:59:29 PM »
Big Tone did you see how poo our senior players were today?
Unfortunately yes, but Nason is the worst player in the AFL.
No he is not! Nason has a real dip for his size! We played against a bunch of kids today and Nason would should have shown many of them up!

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #136 on: July 16, 2011, 06:01:47 PM »
have a dip all you want
he is too small , full stop

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #137 on: July 16, 2011, 06:06:59 PM »
have a dip all you want
he is too small , full stop
I agree, he is too small! But he aint the worse in the league!

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #138 on: July 16, 2011, 06:07:31 PM »
Can someone tell me why this guy isnt getting a game in the seniors? Hasn't he been good for Coburg? Surely can't be no worse than some of the "players" currently on the team
SIMPLE! HE IS poo
EVEN THE COMMENTATOR LAUGHED TODAY HOW LIGHT HE IS!
WOULD RATHER PLAY ONE SHORT THAN GIVE THAT LITTLE TWERP A GAME.
AND SACK WHOEVER DRAFTED HIM

I'd rather have Nason out there putting his head ove rthe pill than Grigg who continues to skirt around the edges and pull out of contests



Ridiculous post..

Grigg was good today

You reckon Grigg was good today? God Help Us thats all I can say.  :banghead

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #139 on: July 16, 2011, 06:08:36 PM »
Big Tone did you see how poo our senior players were today?
Unfortunately yes, but Nason is the worst player in the AFL.
No he is not! Nason has a real dip for his size! We played against a bunch of kids today and Nason would should have shown many of them up!
"Nason has a real dip for his size"
Says it all- this is the AFL not the under 10's.
Although would still get knocked over playing with the under 10"s.  :lol

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #140 on: July 16, 2011, 06:09:11 PM »
Agreed if Grigg was one of our betters then............... :help

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #141 on: July 16, 2011, 06:13:37 PM »
Big Tone did you see how poo our senior players were today?
Unfortunately yes, but Nason is the worst player in the AFL.
No he is not! Nason has a real dip for his size! We played against a bunch of kids today and Nason would should have shown many of them up!
"Nason has a real dip for his size"
Says it all- this is the AFL not the under 10's.
Although would still get knocked over playing with the under 10"s.  :lol
I agree he is too small but that is not his fault and he is not the worst player in the league!

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #142 on: July 16, 2011, 06:17:09 PM »
Big Tone did you see how poo our senior players were today?
Unfortunately yes, but Nason is the worst player in the AFL.
No he is not! Nason has a real dip for his size! We played against a bunch of kids today and Nason would should have shown many of them up!
"Nason has a real dip for his size"
Says it all- this is the AFL not the under 10's.
Although would still get knocked over playing with the under 10"s.  :lol
I agree he is too small but that is not his fault and he is not the worst player in the league!
Yes he is!!  :sleep

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #143 on: July 16, 2011, 06:26:05 PM »
Can someone tell me why this guy isnt getting a game in the seniors? Hasn't he been good for Coburg? Surely can't be no worse than some of the "players" currently on the team
SIMPLE! HE IS poo
EVEN THE COMMENTATOR LAUGHED TODAY HOW LIGHT HE IS!
WOULD RATHER PLAY ONE SHORT THAN GIVE THAT LITTLE TWERP A GAME.
AND SACK WHOEVER DRAFTED HIM

I'd rather have Nason out there putting his head ove rthe pill than Grigg who continues to skirt around the edges and pull out of contests


id rather a combination of both it would only amount to a reasonably well rounded or average  player but hey we dont have many of them.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #144 on: July 16, 2011, 06:28:05 PM »
Nason is a rag doll. Gets tackled knocked to the ground and manhandled.
Yep he puts his head over the ball but you have t get it more than average 10 times a game also.
Grigg did have 30 touches but the fumbling and sloppiness just kills you.
I see it this way Grigg's 30 touches are akin to an average size turd in a field with 5 flies on it as opposed to Nahas who had less touches but his were akin to a bigger turd in a field with 3 flies on it.
In any event there are heaps of turds in the fields all shapes sizes and colour with flies on them right now.
All represent the RFC as a whole.
ha nice analogy. i may borrow it at some stage.

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #145 on: July 16, 2011, 06:29:58 PM »
Big Tone did you see how poo our senior players were today?
Unfortunately yes, but Nason is the worst player in the AFL.
No he is not! Nason has a real dip for his size! We played against a bunch of kids today and Nason would should have shown many of them up!
"Nason has a real dip for his size"
Says it all- this is the AFL not the under 10's.
Although would still get knocked over playing with the under 10"s.  :lol
I agree he is too small but that is not his fault and he is not the worst player in the league!
Yes he is!!  :sleep
Can you play better than him?

Online TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5716
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #146 on: July 16, 2011, 06:42:41 PM »
Can someone tell me why this guy isnt getting a game in the seniors? Hasn't he been good for Coburg? Surely can't be no worse than some of the "players" currently on the team
SIMPLE! HE IS poo
EVEN THE COMMENTATOR LAUGHED TODAY HOW LIGHT HE IS!
WOULD RATHER PLAY ONE SHORT THAN GIVE THAT LITTLE TWERP A GAME.
AND SACK WHOEVER DRAFTED HIM

I'd rather have Nason out there putting his head ove rthe pill than Grigg who continues to skirt around the edges and pull out of contests



Ridiculous post..

Grigg was good today

You reckon Grigg was good today? God Help Us thats all I can say.  :banghead

32 possessions, 9 marks, 2 tackles. And kicked a goal with his only shot on goal for the day, compare that to our 18 odd behinds plus ran all day.

I'd consider that a pass for a guy who is playing his 17th game for the side.

Just wondering what more you'd like the boy to do?

Compare that to our blood nut tagger who couldn't keep quiet Ablett on one leg. 15+ blokes were worse than Grigg today. Easily in our top 5.
Go Tigers!

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #147 on: July 16, 2011, 06:52:45 PM »
Can someone tell me why this guy isnt getting a game in the seniors? Hasn't he been good for Coburg? Surely can't be no worse than some of the "players" currently on the team
SIMPLE! HE IS poo
EVEN THE COMMENTATOR LAUGHED TODAY HOW LIGHT HE IS!
WOULD RATHER PLAY ONE SHORT THAN GIVE THAT LITTLE TWERP A GAME.
AND SACK WHOEVER DRAFTED HIM

I'd rather have Nason out there putting his head ove rthe pill than Grigg who continues to skirt around the edges and pull out of contests



Ridiculous post..

Grigg was good today

You reckon Grigg was good today? God Help Us thats all I can say.  :banghead

32 possessions, 9 marks, 2 tackles. And kicked a goal with his only shot on goal for the day, compare that to our 18 odd behinds plus ran all day.

I'd consider that a pass for a guy who is playing his 17th game for the side.

Just wondering what more you'd like the boy to do?

Compare that to our blood nut tagger who couldn't keep quiet Ablett on one leg. 15+ blokes were worse than Grigg today. Easily in our top 5.

For a  bloke who got the footy 32 times he was majorly ineffective and disappointing. The games not about possessions, especially if theyre going backwards and sideways and putting other blokes under pressure or just kicking to a contest. Poor performance for mine today. Hes been very average since the start of the year, played 4 or 5 good games and average since.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #148 on: July 16, 2011, 08:14:11 PM »
Big Tone did you see how poo our senior players were today?
Unfortunately yes, but Nason is the worst player in the AFL.
No he is not! Nason has a real dip for his size! We played against a bunch of kids today and Nason would should have shown many of them up!
"Nason has a real dip for his size"
Says it all- this is the AFL not the under 10's.
Although would still get knocked over playing with the under 10"s.  :lol
I agree he is too small but that is not his fault and he is not the worst player in the league!
Yes he is!!  :sleep
Can you play better than him?

at age 22 i reckon i could.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Ben Nason [merged]
« Reply #149 on: July 16, 2011, 08:32:34 PM »
Nason is a rag doll. Gets tackled knocked to the ground and manhandled.
Yep he puts his head over the ball but you have t get it more than average 10 times a game also.
Grigg did have 30 touches but the fumbling and sloppiness just kills you.
I see it this way Grigg's 30 touches are akin to an average size turd in a field with 5 flies on it as opposed to Nahas who had less touches but his were akin to a bigger turd in a field with 3 flies on it.
In any event there are heaps of turds in the fields all shapes sizes and colour with flies on them right now.
All represent the RFC as a whole.


Taken this post to bring a smile to my face. Thanks Tucker, can we re-name ME centre T.U.R.D centre?
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”