all this talk about Collingwood youngsters not being good & when the older players retire
Thyere assistant coaches being new to coaching get it right why cant we
well everyone of them played a huge part in todays game againt the dogs & they aint going down the ladder anytime in the next 10 years
funny how the tigers youngsters are poo yet other clubs can manage to build
What Collingwood youngsters?
They're one of the oldest sides in the comp. Their side on the weekend was on average 3 years older and played over twice as many games per player than Richmond's was. They had only two players under 22 years old.
Collingwood (R1, 2010) - Avg Age: 26, Avg Games: 131
32. Prestigiacomo (221)
31. O'Bree (241)
30. Lockyer (217)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28. Brown (205), Davis (185), Fraser (192), Johnson (186), Jolly (167), Medhurst (159)
27. Didak (159)
26. Maxwell (119), Swan (126)
25. Ball (143)
24. Shaw (93)
23. Cloke (101), O'Brien (86), Toovey (42)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. Anthony (37), Pendlebury (77), Thomas (86)
21. Wellingham (29)
20.
19. Sidebottom (12)
18.
Malthouse has topped up for a final tilt at a flag in his last two remaining years. If it fails then it's no skin off Mick's nose as Bucks will be left the mess when there's a mass retirement of experienced players in 2-3 years time.