Author Topic: Non-Richmond games 2010  (Read 35567 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57995
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Non-Richmond games 2010
« on: March 27, 2010, 05:46:42 AM »
I didn't see all of it but it looked a pretty good game of footy between the Cats and Bombers. At least for 3 quarters. I still question Knighters' all-frontrunning gameplan. Looks very dangerous when they are on top during a game but the Bombers ran out of puff halfway through the 2nd quarter again against a top side. Geelong saw Essendon were tiring and just went into overdrive and blew the Bombers away. It didn't help that Neagle, Gumby and Williams did sweet stuff all. Sheesh Neagle is a spud  :rollin.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2010, 07:47:57 AM »
Yeah the Dons don't have the fitness to run that gameplan out but they are quick enough to play it and watching last night I can see how they flogged us at Morwell.  Simply a more polished unit.  Dons will be better this year than I thought but will still just be a team making up the numbers and I don't see where their improvement to be a premiership contender comes from.
EAT EM ALIVE!

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2010, 07:59:02 AM »
Watched the game in detail.
Like the way the bombers play.
Wish we would play that way..
Geelong are probably a 15 goal better team than us.
Essendon a 10 goal.
Hopefully we dont have to play either too soon

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2010, 02:47:08 PM »
Wow.  Melbourne.  :-[
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57995
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2010, 02:52:25 PM »
Well if we didn't know who the two bottom sides will be we do now. Dees 6 goals down at 1/4 time and were held goal-less. Brad Green knocked out as well.

LOL Garry Lyon on MMM still saying the Hawks aren't a 6 goal better side than his beloved Dees   :stupid
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2010, 10:16:39 PM »
saying hawks arent a 6 goal better side then the dee's is one of the worst calls.
i wonder if hutchy will bring it up on good call or bad call this week haha.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13540
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2010, 09:09:27 PM »
What a machine Barlow is.

Freo pick him up from Werribee FFS. Gee where has this guy been hiding he is ready made
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2010, 09:28:17 PM »
all this talk about Collingwood youngsters not being good & when the older players retire
Thyere assistant coaches being new to coaching get it right why cant we
well everyone of them played a huge part in todays game againt the dogs & they aint going down the ladder anytime in the next 10 years
funny how the tigers youngsters are poo yet other clubs can manage to build

looking at Fremantle now  ;D OMG another club steping up belting the Crows at present  ;D

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2010, 10:34:44 PM »
just seen the score line of freo and crows what is happening over there any1 actually watchnig the game?

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2010, 10:41:56 PM »
just seen the score line of freo and crows what is happening over there any1 actually watchnig the game?


l'm watching the game & freo are killing them in fact smothering them
Barlow is on fire you can see flames coming out his ass blowing nitro
So many good players for Freo all over the ground

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2010, 11:05:49 PM »
if freo has stepped up over off season that makes us look even worse good thing demons arent great haha

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2010, 08:02:40 PM »
I know that a lot of opposition supporters (and some of the black and white fools judging from some around me the other day) don't rate Dale Thomas, but after seeing him live for the first time I'd say that a lot of our boys could take a leaf out of his book on hard hard he worked to create space from the kick ins and getting to the contest around the ground.

The courage shown by the young fella (can't think of his name at the moment) to spoil Hall and earn 6 stitches in his head...pity he is in playing for the skunks.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57995
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2010, 07:03:01 AM »
all this talk about Collingwood youngsters not being good & when the older players retire
Thyere assistant coaches being new to coaching get it right why cant we
well everyone of them played a huge part in todays game againt the dogs & they aint going down the ladder anytime in the next 10 years
funny how the tigers youngsters are poo yet other clubs can manage to build
What Collingwood youngsters?

They're one of the oldest sides in the comp. Their side on the weekend was on average 3 years older and played over twice as many games per player than Richmond's was. They had only two players under 22 years old.

Collingwood (R1, 2010) - Avg Age: 26, Avg Games: 131

32. Prestigiacomo (221)
31. O'Bree (241)
30. Lockyer (217)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28. Brown (205), Davis (185), Fraser (192), Johnson (186), Jolly (167), Medhurst (159)
27. Didak (159)
26. Maxwell (119), Swan (126)
25. Ball (143)
24. Shaw (93)
23. Cloke (101), O'Brien (86), Toovey (42)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. Anthony (37), Pendlebury (77), Thomas (86)
21. Wellingham (29)
20.
19. Sidebottom (12)
18.


Malthouse has topped up for a final tilt at a flag in his last two remaining years. If it fails then it's no skin off Mick's nose as Bucks will be left the mess when there's a mass retirement of experienced players in 2-3 years time.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2010, 10:10:29 PM »
The bulk of Collingwood's list can still play on post Malthouse coaching tenure.
The Pies can cover players of the ilk of Presti O'Bree and Lockyer who are their oldest as at Pieland they are a dime a dozen and there is always a player of similar ability to take their place. Thing with the Pies is they are very even and most do their job as instructed.

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2010
« Reply #14 on: April 01, 2010, 02:07:37 PM »
tonights game should be a good one to see. lions vs carlton. be a good test to see how carlton go without fev.