PP still available - not all doom and gloom

[Francois Jackson]

gee watching Scully and Trengrove you can never have enough quality picks

they are going to be 2 stars those boys.

both over 15 possy's each again against the buldogs at half time

[tony_montana]

see their final tally's?    scully 39!

that's why you dont scoff at "playing the game" and making sure we get picks 4 & 6 next year!

[Hellenic Tiger]

see their final tally's?    scully 39!

that's why you dont scoff at "playing the game" and making sure we get picks 4 & 6 next year!

That's why we should have lost that Melbourne game last year.
They would not have had pick 2 and we would have had pick 1, 17 and 18.
Now and in the future Melbourne will be a far better side with Scully and Trengove in there as opposed to just one. One would have been at Freo or NM or WCE. We should keep the win loss stats of when one is not playing as testament to winning a game that was worth more toThat's why we should have lost that Melbourne game last year.

[the claw]

tony would anyone want to come to our club at the moment given where we are?

did any one want to go to melb last yr. go thru the right processes get a shedload of quality kids into the system   (we have some we just need to build on what we have) and players will want to come.  joel macdonald anyone. he nominated melb. still cant work out why voss got rid of him. nothing special but a decent skilled honest player.
for what its worth i cant work out why voss traded the way he has. or even more pertinant why the media have said nothing. i suppose in a way hes one of theirs.

[the claw]

just on topic good news we can look forward to this yr at the least picks 4 27 28 44 61. trade into a pick in the top 15 and it could be handy.

[tiger till i die]

I was skimming the Bommers forum and i saw that they were trying to get pick 4 next year... who do they think they are lol

[Infamy]

That's why we should have lost that Melbourne game last year.
They would not have had pick 2 and we would have had pick 1, 17 and 18.

Melbourne would have lost Pick 2, but we'd still have had too many wins from beating Essendon

[Hellenic Tiger]

That's why we should have lost that Melbourne game last year.
They would not have had pick 2 and we would have had pick 1, 17 and 18.

Melbourne would have lost Pick 2, but we'd still have had too many wins from beating Essendon

I keep forgetting to mention the North game too Infamy.

Gave up a 7 goal half time lead to draw when the loss would have been just fine.

If that game meant something the draw would have been as bad as a loss but as we know assuming we lost

that Melbourne game and lost the North game would have left us at 4 wins. Melbourne at 5. Freo at 5 and Nth

and W Coast well above the bottom 3.

By the way Infamy love the Disco Stu avatar in the back of the limo.

[taztiger4]

we wont get picks 4 , 27 & 28
27 will be the PP, then GC have first pick of every round so that would be 28
we would then get 29 for finishing bottom

[Francois Jackson]

see their final tally's?    scully 39!

that's why you dont scoff at "playing the game" and making sure we get picks 4 & 6 next year!

That's why we should have lost that Melbourne game last year.
They would not have had pick 2 and we would have had pick 1, 17 and 18.
Now and in the future Melbourne will be a far better side with Scully and Trengove in there as opposed to just one. One would have been at Freo or NM or WCE. We should keep the win loss stats of when one is not playing as testament to winning a game that was worth more toThat's why we should have lost that Melbourne game last year.

correct!!!

anyone who has any doubt as to who has a better list while i can assure you the Dees will become the new carlton and Scully/Watts/Trengrove will be the new Gibbs/Kruzer/Murphy.

I put the blame soley and squarely on Cameron for winnning those games.

You cannot tell me Gary Lyon and co didnt have a say in the Dees playing the system beautifully last year while at Punt Road, we are constantly being led by clowns like Cameron and Jackson who have no stuffin idea.