Author Topic: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)  (Read 8512 times)

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8545
  • In Absentia
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #15 on: May 06, 2010, 04:28:28 PM »
Id give Jackson, Edwards and 2nd round pick for Boak. Although if we really do want him I can see us swapping 1st round picks with Port and throwing in a player either Edwards or Jackson. Boaks a terrific player.

I'd be all for a first round pick swap.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #16 on: May 06, 2010, 06:44:34 PM »
As far as I can tell GC17 don't get first pick in the PSD
Perhaps we could talk him into walking for decent $$$

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #17 on: May 06, 2010, 07:59:21 PM »
what Port would want (and will get) we dont have to give simple as that, dont get your hopes up ppl. Burgoyne went for picks 9 & 16, Boak has more currency..

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #18 on: May 06, 2010, 08:22:00 PM »
what Port would want (and will get) we dont have to give simple as that, dont get your hopes up ppl. Burgoyne went for picks 9 & 16, Boak has more currency..

Possibly but Hawthorn were very aggressive in the trade period and gave 25 and 41 for Gibson which may have been a bit overpriced so Port seeing this and knowing the Hawks were willing to offload Williams they waited until all those deals were done and got the most out of the Hawks there too.

Put simply I felt we should have kept our mouth shut and not shoot off our intentions. Clubs may have assumed we might have been aggressive but knowing that we are now may incline them to ask too much for a trade much like the Hawks did last year. Nevertheless  I still feel Tambling and a third round pick that can get bargained to a second round pick can be agreed upon for Boak.

One question what about the pre season draft with us finishing last. Do we get first pick in December or does GC  if assuming no club does a trade and he falls through the Novermber draft also.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #19 on: May 06, 2010, 08:29:04 PM »
what Port would want (and will get) we dont have to give simple as that, dont get your hopes up ppl. Burgoyne went for picks 9 & 16, Boak has more currency..

Possibly but Hawthorn were very aggressive in the trade period and gave 25 and 41 for Gibson which may have been a bit overpriced so Port seeing this and knowing the Hawks were willing to offload Williams they waited until all those deals were done and got the most out of the Hawks there too.

Put simply I felt we should have kept our mouth shut and not shoot off our intentions. Clubs may have assumed we might have been aggressive but knowing that we are now may incline them to ask too much for a trade much like the Hawks did last year. Nevertheless  I still feel Tambling and a third round pick that can get bargained to a second round pick can be agreed upon for Boak.

One question what about the pre season draft with us finishing last. Do we get first pick in December or does GC  if assuming no club does a trade and he falls through the Novermber draft also.

nah no chance tambling and our 2nd pick would get it done tucker, Boak is a seriously good talent and his worth has gone up from the pick 5 (or whatever it was he was taken at). They'll want first rounders and clubs like collingwood who are locked and loaded will move heaven and earth to get them to port.

as for the PSD, im not sure, but bottom line is they can get 16 uncontracted players and they would be well within their rights to use them up before we get our 1st pick if I'm not mistaken.

and I agree we should not be signalling our intentions ::). In 05 and 06 did the hawks bang on about not wanting to pay wallace and eade 600k per season instead opting to put that money into the footy department? No they didn't, they kept their mouths shut, took ther medicine and just backed clarko continuously saying he was the right man for the job, once they won the premiership they turned around and sad this is what we did, now suck it up. smart operators the whoreks

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #20 on: May 06, 2010, 08:32:26 PM »
what Port would want (and will get) we dont have to give simple as that, dont get your hopes up ppl. Burgoyne went for picks 9 & 16, Boak has more currency..

Possibly but Hawthorn were very aggressive in the trade period and gave 25 and 41 for Gibson which may have been a bit overpriced so Port seeing this and knowing the Hawks were willing to offload Williams they waited until all those deals were done and got the most out of the Hawks there too.

Put simply I felt we should have kept our mouth shut and not shoot off our intentions. Clubs may have assumed we might have been aggressive but knowing that we are now may incline them to ask too much for a trade much like the Hawks did last year. Nevertheless  I still feel Tambling and a third round pick that can get bargained to a second round pick can be agreed upon for Boak.

One question what about the pre season draft with us finishing last. Do we get first pick in December or does GC  if assuming no club does a trade and he falls through the Novermber draft also.

nah no chance tambling and our 2nd pick would get it done tucker, Boak is a seriously good talent and his worth has gone up from the pick 5 (or whatever it was he was taken at). They'll want first rounders and clubs like collingwood who are locked and loaded will move heaven and earth to get them to port.

as for the PSD, im not sure, but bottom line is they can get 16 uncontracted players and they would be well within their rights to use them up before we get our 1st pick if I'm not mistaken.
Pretty sure uncontracted players need to agree to go to GC, they can't just select them like in a draft

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5862
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #21 on: May 06, 2010, 08:54:53 PM »
Foley for a 10-12 pick (Hawthorn would snap him up)
Tambling for a 20 pick (St.Kildas first pick)
Jackson and our 2nd rounder pick 29 to Port (The need a harder body to compensate the run of Rodan, Pearce and Cassissi) for Robbi Gray.

We lose:
Foley
Jackson
Tambling

Gain:
10-12 pick
Robbie Gray

Be a reasonable start having Robbie Gray and having picks 4, 10, 20 (what ever our 2nd pick would be)
Go Tigers!

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #22 on: May 06, 2010, 08:59:57 PM »
I think trading with Port can be favourable. Although they won a flag the year after Stevens left for Carlton for no compensation Port have been seething since and have never ever wanted to go down that path again. Whether he stays, goes to us or goes elsewhere he will go and Port will get compensation.

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8545
  • In Absentia
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #23 on: May 06, 2010, 09:02:22 PM »
Foley for a 10-12 pick (Hawthorn would snap him up)
Tambling for a 20 pick (St.Kildas first pick)
Jackson and our 2nd rounder pick 29 to Port (The need a harder body to compensate the run of Rodan, Pearce and Cassissi) for Robbi Gray.

We lose:
Foley
Jackson
Tambling

Gain:
10-12 pick
Robbie Gray

Be a reasonable start having Robbie Gray and having picks 4, 10, 20 (what ever our 2nd pick would be)

Robbie Gray is a better version of Morton. We can offload Morton if we get Gray.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #24 on: May 06, 2010, 09:03:22 PM »
Im pretty sure richmond will cower in the likes of collingwood and Saints when going for him .. But i gess we MIGHT get him because we don't have richo or brown which frees some money, but then again collingwood will probably promise him heaps of money and glory like Ball .. what can we offer him? diddle squat ?

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8545
  • In Absentia
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #25 on: May 06, 2010, 09:06:02 PM »
Problem is Collingwood will think Rusling will get the deal done, or offer pick 30 like they did with Ball.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #26 on: May 06, 2010, 09:12:38 PM »
Problem is Collingwood will think Rusling will get the deal done, or offer pick 30 like they did with Ball.

ermm .. ill ask you guys if you were a 21 year old gun in the afl would you want to go to richmond ?? bottom of the ladder and will remain there for a good few years ??? and your not a richmond fan :P 

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5862
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #27 on: May 06, 2010, 09:22:55 PM »
Foley for a 10-12 pick (Hawthorn would snap him up)
Tambling for a 20 pick (St.Kildas first pick)
Jackson and our 2nd rounder pick 29 to Port (The need a harder body to compensate the run of Rodan, Pearce and Cassissi) for Robbi Gray.

We lose:
Foley
Jackson
Tambling

Gain:
10-12 pick
Robbie Gray

Be a reasonable start having Robbie Gray and having picks 4, 10, 20 (what ever our 2nd pick would be)

Robbie Gray is a better version of Morton. We can offload Morton if we get Gray.

I think this day and age its vital to have 2 small forwards, they'd be great together for a period of 5-8 years. With Griffths and Jack Riewoldt as talls with Astbury and Taylor on the Flanks. Thats a great forward line. I think Port will think they are closer to a flag then they think and would rather a seasoned player than a draft pick for Gray. Giving them Morton and a pick is a lose/lose. Robbing peter to pay Paul with the risk that the upgrade from Morton to Gray could be another Callan Ward scenario
Go Tigers!

Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #28 on: May 06, 2010, 09:31:06 PM »
i like Morton, id rather him than no listen Reiwoldt ... he will become nothing ..

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in Port's Travis Boak (Age)
« Reply #29 on: May 06, 2010, 09:35:02 PM »
i like Morton, id rather him than no listen Reiwoldt ... he will become nothing ..

That's a big call. One I certainly don't agree with. Jack had shouldered a huge load this year and is only 21.
More upside for Jack to come especially with Post, Astbury, Vickery and Griffiths yet to stamp their mark as a KPP in the forward line.