Author Topic: Jacko reported  (Read 7560 times)

Offline Beren

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2010, 10:32:36 AM »
he's becoming a liability IMHO. Cant Kick and getting himself suspended all the time. At best he is a squad player.

Best piece of uninformed garbage I've read here in a while.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2010, 10:50:54 AM »
To be honest i dont mind our players being nasty SOB ..I want us to be nasty buggers.i've had it with Richmond being nice boys....The lads are making a statement here and lets back them to the hilt

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5864
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2010, 01:01:58 PM »
Well it looks like an old school report.

Vosso (I still don't know the rules after 150 games) reported Jacko so suggests to me that he saw it and can give evidence.

Nothing was shown on replay.

Staggering that in todays day in age Foxtel didn't have any vision of it. Same with the free kick King gave away in the final qtr that was 100m off the ball. Also no specific footage of the boundary line infringement. Foxtel have great coverage but seemed a few camera men were asleep last night.
Go Tigers!

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7394
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2010, 01:04:26 PM »
We dont need suspensions, that said I dont mind too much! We have been
softco(ks for a long time, about time we harden t f up.
I like it. Jackos good value

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9826
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2010, 01:39:15 PM »
Jacko is part of the team fibre whether some like to admit it or not.
We miss him and his take no poo attitude when he;s suspended

agree.  :clapping
The club that keeps giving.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2010, 01:47:13 PM »
I heard it was a shirt front not a punch and there wasn't any footage of it.  Whats the MRP gonna review.  Unless Ballantyne squeals...

thats what I understand to, off the ball though , will be lucky to get only 2 ...is a good tough player Jacko, does not take a backward step :gotigers
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59486
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2010, 05:37:44 PM »
I heard it was a shirt front not a punch and there wasn't any footage of it.  Whats the MRP gonna review.  Unless Ballantyne squeals...

thats what I understand to, off the ball though , will be lucky to get only 2 ...is a good tough player Jacko, does not take a backward step :gotigers
That's why Jacko was charged with rough conduct rather than striking. If it was a punch it would be a striking charge.

And yep targetting Ballantyne wasn't a bad ploy. A key player for them and he did sweet all for the night as Chucky said.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2010, 07:44:19 PM »
I wonder if he contested the charge he could get off because of lack of evidence. If the Review Panel has no footage to use and a partial eye witness account perhaps they will have no choice but to throw out the case.... :pray

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59486
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2010, 08:36:19 PM »
I wonder if he contested the charge he could get off because of lack of evidence. If the Review Panel has no footage to use and a partial eye witness account perhaps they will have no choice but to throw out the case.... :pray
Didn't Vozzo report Jacko?
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #24 on: July 12, 2010, 01:08:50 AM »
spiteful game in close i reckon.
Gus was taken out a beauty.

Those who say get behind Jacko as we need more hard arses - u echo my sentiment.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #25 on: July 12, 2010, 01:21:10 AM »
We dont need suspensions, that said I dont mind too much! We have been
softco(ks for a long time, about time we harden t f up.
I like it. Jackos good value

agree  :thumbsup

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8547
  • In Absentia
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #26 on: July 12, 2010, 04:59:10 PM »
Jacko has been offered two weeks.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100509
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #27 on: July 12, 2010, 05:01:15 PM »
Jacko has been offered two weeks.
Is that with the early plea wayne?

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8547
  • In Absentia
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #28 on: July 12, 2010, 05:04:45 PM »
Jacko has been offered two weeks.
Is that with the early plea wayne?

Not sure, they have just said a 2 week suspension for striking Ballantyne.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100509
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Jacko reported
« Reply #29 on: July 12, 2010, 05:09:01 PM »
Jacko has been offered two weeks.
Is that with the early plea wayne?

Not sure, they have just said a 2 week suspension for striking Ballantyne.
No probs :cheers