Author Topic: Connors Vs Tambling  (Read 5621 times)

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #30 on: August 17, 2010, 06:33:55 AM »
both should be given the flick and traded out of Punt Rd

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40360
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #31 on: August 17, 2010, 06:50:04 AM »
I am just happy to see more joining me on the dark side re Connors

 :rollin :rollin
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3812
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #32 on: August 17, 2010, 07:11:17 AM »
Both appear to be in danger of delisting but have a feeling the Club won't delist either this year. Fully concede I may be totally wrong

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #33 on: August 17, 2010, 07:23:31 AM »
Both appear to be in danger of delisting but have a feeling the Club won't delist either this year. Fully concede I may be totally wrong

tambling is safe

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #34 on: August 17, 2010, 07:53:13 AM »
If Tambling is safe then we really are going nowhere as a club

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #35 on: August 17, 2010, 08:36:28 PM »
Tambling for me, He holds his booze better than Conners  ;D

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2460
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #36 on: August 17, 2010, 08:53:39 PM »
Neither whipping boy will be going anywhere- there is half team below them in the pecking order.

Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #37 on: August 17, 2010, 09:25:09 PM »

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #38 on: August 17, 2010, 09:36:35 PM »
If Tambling is safe then we really are going nowhere as a club

best post of the year so far, thank you Rolls

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #39 on: August 17, 2010, 10:18:58 PM »
neither will be traded,

connors in particular is safe as houses

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #40 on: August 17, 2010, 10:57:39 PM »
neither will be traded,

connors in particular is safe as houses

are we gonna get anyone decent from another club this year Blaisee?

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #41 on: August 17, 2010, 11:14:17 PM »
connors V tambling..now theres a bout between 2 real heavyweights.
wouldnt give a pack of twisties for either of them at this stage

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #42 on: August 18, 2010, 12:21:22 AM »
I agree. Connors is better by foot
Connors is ordinary by foot. Massively overrated by the fans IMO.

lol, get a clue...is a beautiful kick...for a fella <20 games he is travelling just right
would disagree ordinary about sums him up by foot and decision making especially under pressure.

Offline TheUmpire

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #43 on: August 18, 2010, 02:16:16 AM »
I agree. Connors is better by foot
Connors is ordinary by foot. Massively overrated by the fans IMO.

lol, get a clue...is a beautiful kick...for a fella <20 games he is travelling just right
would disagree ordinary about sums him up by foot and decision making especially under pressure.

To be fair, I thought he was ordinary a few weeks ago. Lately he simply stinks.

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #44 on: August 18, 2010, 05:27:13 AM »
neither will be traded,

connors in particular is safe as houses

are we gonna get anyone decent from another club this year Blaisee?

only if it can be done in the pre season draft