« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?  (Read 5416 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100646
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« on: July 30, 2010, 05:53:27 AM »
According to BF,

"good to see young jake will be a tiger for next year with an option for 2012 well done jake keep it going"

http://bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=737473


 :o
Logged

richmondrules

  • Guest
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2010, 07:46:38 AM »
Don't see why this would be a surprise. Has done everything asked of him, has made great strides in keeping a lid on it and behaving and is a regular in our best 22.

The thing that is impressing me (if this BF post is true) is that we don't appear to be handing out big contracts any more. 1 year with performance triggers for two for Tucky (don't believe this is confirmed) and 1 year for Jake with an option for 2 if we want him.
Logged

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14279
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2010, 08:44:34 AM »
To sign King and Tuck is a good thing IMO. It shows that Hardwicks message is clear and these players have improved out of sight.

I would say King may be in our top 10 B & F since that Stkilda game where he demolished NDS. His kicking has improved also.

Whilst im not a fan of the midgets i think he can be a cleaver tagger we have been waiting for not like Patty Payne Nahas who should be delisted.

Logged
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2010, 10:46:41 AM »
shocking decision
Logged

FNM

  • Guest
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2010, 11:35:57 AM »
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead
Logged

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2010, 11:41:19 AM »
we need hard players like jake
get rid of softies like nahas
Logged

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2010, 11:42:41 AM »
Quote from: FNM on July 30, 2010, 11:35:57 AM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?
Logged

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2010, 01:56:08 PM »
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Logged

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5864
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2010, 01:57:49 PM »
I think you'll find Jake wont be in the best 22 next year, this isn't the reason why he should be let go. A mature gutsy footballer as depth isn't a bad idea. He isn't our future but he has worth on our list in the 2s to come in and play and fill a role and he has shown this year he can do that.
Logged
Go Tigers!

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2010, 02:14:46 PM »
If it's similar to Tucks (1, with triggers for 2), then I'm all for it.  He's a great leader.
Logged

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5371
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2010, 02:33:23 PM »
Quote from: Ramps on July 30, 2010, 11:42:41 AM
Quote from: FNM on July 30, 2010, 11:35:57 AM
Hardwick's first dumb decision  :banghead

Agree but was it his or someone elses?

2nd dumb decision, 1st was Tuck! IMO.

Edwards, Polo, Nahas are in the gun IMO!

Two of them have to go!
Logged

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2069
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2010, 02:56:55 PM »
is this confirmed or are you all jumping at shadows !
Logged

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2010, 03:00:58 PM »
Quote from: Danog on July 30, 2010, 02:14:46 PM
If it's similar to Tucks (1, with triggers for 2), then I'm all for it.  He's a great leader.

whose a great leader?

Logged

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2010, 03:37:20 PM »
haha wouldnt rely on BF as a great source i'll just wait till its confirmed before saying anything.
Logged

Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Jake King re-signed for 2 years?
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2010, 03:37:47 PM »
like it or not kingy happens to be one of our not that big but big names.. Collingwood all know who is for sure ;) and he has improved heaps from last year and is doing all he is requierd to do and he has proven he can be a good tagger (how many big players has he injured? some of ours :P but for a small body he is worth an extra year ... he shows that he is a tiger beacue he is alwasy doing stuff for teh club and i am happy to have him again

you NOOO sayers sorry but you must be blind to not see the impacts he has on some games and his improvments  :)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »