Author Topic: Brad Miller [merged]  (Read 75624 times)

Offline yandb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 757
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #120 on: November 01, 2010, 10:00:52 AM »
The only reason clubs pick up players like Miller is they are having a tilt at a finals campaign.

We can oly hope :)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #121 on: November 01, 2010, 11:40:41 AM »
Either that or because he has the fittest misses going around

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #122 on: November 01, 2010, 02:20:50 PM »
Either that or because he has the fittest misses going around

That has got to be why we are Rookie-ing Brad!

 :rollin

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #123 on: November 02, 2010, 01:36:45 AM »
The only reason clubs pick up players like Miller is they are having a tilt at a finals campaign.
Not in our case  :P



All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #124 on: November 02, 2010, 09:40:36 AM »
Don't min hislop on the rookie list.

At least he is not soft. Would be a very handy max rooke type player for coburg

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #125 on: November 02, 2010, 02:46:14 PM »
Don't min hislop on the rookie list.

At least he is not soft. Would be a very handy max rooke type player for coburg
Our rookie list should be for the development of potential AFL players for Richmond; not VFL players for Coburg  :P.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #126 on: November 02, 2010, 03:29:33 PM »
Our rookie list should be for the development of potential AFL players for Richmond; not VFL players for Coburg  :P.

Miller i get but I am very annoyed that they are going to rookie Hislop.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #127 on: November 02, 2010, 04:25:37 PM »
yeah, Im having trouble getting my head around that.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #128 on: November 02, 2010, 04:56:09 PM »
Both are a waste of rookie spots as both aren't part of our future. If the Club believed using two late rookie picks on kids is unlikely to find a future AFL standard player (poor thinking btw) then we would be better off going short next year (6 rookies instead of 8) and saving the two rookie salaries to fund the new gym equipment instead (which we need also otherwise the Club wouldn't be asking for supporters to contribute towards it). Saving two rookie salaries is worth $70k-$100k.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Oiafi

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Against logic there is no armour like ignorance.
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #129 on: November 02, 2010, 05:42:48 PM »
and saving the two rookie salaries to fund the new gym equipment instead (which we need also otherwise the Club wouldn't be asking for supporters to contribute towards it).

I keep hearing this and I really don't understand the logic of these comments. Of course the club is going to ask and so they should. If they don't get enough money then they will no doubt fund the balance. I would expect Collingwood to ask also. Any money you can get funded from elsewhere frees up money for other things. If you as a supporter don't want to contribute then don't, some might quite like the idea of supplying some gym equipment. I have no problem with them asking. Don't ask, don't get.

Personally I think it's up to the coaches to decide who they should or should not rookie. If they see worth in Miller and Hislop then it's their call. They're the ones with the plan and they can run it any way they like. I am quite sure if they saw no value in Hislop he'd be gone. Hardwick et al seem quite capable of making the hard call. If it doesn't work and he's gone at the end of the year then that is not an indication they have no idea, simply means that something they tried didn't work. Same deal as Roberts, same deal as the Hawks and Peterson.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #130 on: November 02, 2010, 08:39:32 PM »
Both are a waste of rookie spots as both aren't part of our future. If the Club believed using two late rookie picks on kids is unlikely to find a future AFL standard player (poor thinking btw) then we would be better off going short next year (6 rookies instead of 8) and saving the two rookie salaries to fund the new gym equipment instead (which we need also otherwise the Club wouldn't be asking for supporters to contribute towards it). Saving two rookie salaries is worth $70k-$100k.

I like your thinking MT.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #131 on: November 03, 2010, 01:11:30 AM »
Don't min hislop on the rookie list.

At least he is not soft. Would be a very handy max rooke type player for coburg
Our rookie list should be for the development of potential AFL players for Richmond; not VFL players for Coburg  :P.

hislop is alot younger than miller.

Former high draft pick. Not impossible one day he ends ok afl player

26 Nahas, Robin  33 22yr 11mth 10 Nov 1987 176cm 67kg Oakleigh Chargers Forward 
16 Grigg, Shaun  43 22yr 6mth 19 Apr 1988 190cm 85kg Nth Ballarat Midfield 
42 O'Reilly, Jamie (R)  3 22yr 6mth 28 Apr 1988 184cm 78kg County Down, Ireland Midfield 
27 Hislop, Tom  22 22yr 4mth 7 Jun 1988 185cm 85kg Tassie Mariners Midfield 
46 Webberley, Jeromey  10 22yr 3mth 12 Jul 1988 181cm 74kg Clarence Defender 
19 Connors, Daniel  24 22yr 1mth 22 Sep 1988 184cm 82kg Bendigo Midfield 
10 Edwards, Shane  69 22yr  25 Oct 1988

« Last Edit: November 03, 2010, 01:02:52 PM by Bentleigh-esque »

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #132 on: November 03, 2010, 01:14:20 AM »
Both are a waste of rookie spots as both aren't part of our future. If the Club believed using two late rookie picks on kids is unlikely to find a future AFL standard player (poor thinking btw) then we would be better off going short next year (6 rookies instead of 8) and saving the two rookie salaries to fund the new gym equipment instead (which we need also otherwise the Club wouldn't be asking for supporters to contribute towards it). Saving two rookie salaries is worth $70k-$100k.

rubbish.

Having a full playing roster > saving 70k

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98244
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #133 on: November 03, 2010, 02:49:00 PM »
Here's Miller training with us...


Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #134 on: November 03, 2010, 07:11:11 PM »
Here's Miller training with us...



Lookin foward to seeing him play for the yellow and black  :thumbsup