Author Topic: Brad Miller [merged]  (Read 75839 times)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #480 on: June 16, 2012, 07:10:29 PM »
Whats starting to annoy me is that we have Miller in the seniors,  mcGuane, Graham and Post fwd at the burgers, Astbury, Derickx and Browne in the side too which means Elton gets bumped down to burger reserves!

Thats poor management right there. McGuane is gawn, should be down back. Post has shown a bit up forward recently, bite the friggin bullet and play him against GWS in place of Vickery and MILLER! Derickx is gawn, he should be in the burger reserves and Elton should be cutting his teeth against the best the VFL has to offer.

I probably would have copped post given a shot today but i supported millers inclusion for lack of a better option, we needed the 4 points desperately
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #481 on: June 16, 2012, 07:11:27 PM »


4 times got into jacks way
 :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL
....and nearly killed Kingy :banghead
correct.
He is a joke of a player and a joke of a selection.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5721
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #482 on: June 16, 2012, 07:51:16 PM »
I think we've no past the stage where we need Brad to play this irrelevant role taking an opposition defender away from contests to free up Jack etc.

It doesn't really work and Brad's effort whilst I can respect aren't contributing to wins. I wouldn't be playing Miller again. If Vickery is injured or out of form then give Post more chances then he deserves who knows what will happen. I can't see us achieving anything by having Miller in the side. Miller last year at the club.
Go Tigers!

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #483 on: June 16, 2012, 07:57:55 PM »
I think we've no past the stage where we need Brad to play this irrelevant role taking an opposition defender away from contests to free up Jack etc.

It doesn't really work and Brad's effort whilst I can respect aren't contributing to wins. I wouldn't be playing Miller again. If Vickery is injured or out of form then give Post more chances then he deserves who knows what will happen. I can't see us achieving anything by having Miller in the side. Miller last year at the club.
I'm afraid Post is a post!....and this from someone who has defended him for years. Next year Elton will begin putting pressure on the Tall forwards, if he isn't already.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #484 on: June 16, 2012, 08:03:44 PM »
first time Ive seen Miller play in person, in terms of expectations I set the bar low and he comfortably came under that.

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #485 on: June 16, 2012, 09:12:14 PM »
Miller better option than Vickery at the moment .at least he creates a contest

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #486 on: June 17, 2012, 01:44:45 PM »
As I posted in the Dea thread yesterday I paid particular attention to:

Dea
Connors
Miller
King
Grigg

Will repeat I haven't watched the replay yet

But on Millers game his 1% ers (eg the blocking for the small forwards & restings mids up forward) and those things that don't count as stats are clearly why he is in the side. He did those things again yesterday.

Granted he didn't get much of the ball (but the stats say he had one possession than the skipper ;D) but he presented, bought the ball to ground, protected the smalls and he freed up Maric to be a spare down back by taking the ruck in the forward 50 - that seemed to be his designated role and he did it.

Certainly wasn't the worst yesterday  ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #487 on: June 17, 2012, 02:03:28 PM »
Who was worse?

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #488 on: June 17, 2012, 02:04:30 PM »
Who was worse?

A tie between Jake King & Chris Newman  ;D Both had shockers
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #489 on: June 17, 2012, 02:07:45 PM »
batchelor?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #490 on: June 17, 2012, 02:20:30 PM »
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #491 on: June 17, 2012, 03:02:13 PM »
As I posted in the Dea thread yesterday I paid particular attention to:

Dea
Connors
Miller
King
Grigg

Will repeat I haven't watched the replay yet

But on Millers game his 1% ers (eg the blocking for the small forwards & restings mids up forward) and those things that don't count as stats are clearly why he is in the side. He did those things again yesterday.

Granted he didn't get much of the ball (but the stats say he had one possession than the skipper ;D) but he presented, bought the ball to ground, protected the smalls and he freed up Maric to be a spare down back by taking the ruck in the forward 50 - that seemed to be his designated role and he did it.

Certainly wasn't the worst yesterday  ;D


Am glad someone on this forum actually watches the game
Totally agree WP.Miller did his role
Unlike a few others
Interesting also the fact that Maric played alot behind the ball to try and stop the bleeding in defence

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #492 on: June 17, 2012, 03:04:12 PM »
Major issue if we have inform Ruckman playing behind the ball and not pushing forward
Huge issue in D50 in the moment

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #493 on: June 17, 2012, 03:37:33 PM »
Its the gameplan champ

Offline Muscles

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 843
Re: Brad Miller [merged]
« Reply #494 on: June 17, 2012, 03:38:14 PM »
At times, GWS played two loose men in defense. In the first half, I thought The People's Mullet kept out of our forward half to reduce the numbers in our forward 50.  It didn't work because GWS then had up to three extra players in our attacking 50.  We kept bombing it in, they brought it to ground and had the numbers to hack in out and then we bombed it back in. When GWS actually got to run it out of defense, their superior skills helped them look pretty good.