Author Topic: Richmond Board Nomination  (Read 27478 times)

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #45 on: November 17, 2010, 05:31:55 PM »
Hi, I have been reading this forum for a while and this thread has made me join up so I can have a say!

I agree with Phillip, that as a one eyed tiger supporter, that I am sick of hearing about us being on the right track!!

If we had been on the right track for the last 10 years as they have been saying, surely we would have seen some results on the field, as really they are the only results that matter.

Financially we may not be in the best position but put some wins on the board and that would change very quickly, how can you continue to market a product that is just promises and never delivers results.

Making change for change sake, why don't you want change!   Everybody was happy to make Terry Wallace accountable, why not the board?  Are you happy with 15th in 2011 9th in 2012 15th in 2013 and then watch Damien Hardwick get sacked and start all over again.  Lets not forget that Damien Hardwick is accountable to the same board that Terry Wallace was accountable to and they obviously ok'd everything that Terry Wallace was doing.  Do we just wait until it fails again and listen to the speel over and over.

Why isn't the board accountable for losses, until we start winning some games I will keep voting for change.

I would like to know from Phillip exactly what he thinks he can do to help Richmond put wins on the board, in what way does he feel the board is not performing?  What are they not doing that he thinks he can do better?

We all want the same thing in the end, a premeirship, and expecting anything less from our board is letting our team down.

Thanks for letting me rant

I'm a Richmond supporter to and rant every now and then on this forum. Does it qualify me to run for the board? Answer the questions rather than telling us about an agenda that pulls at the heartstrings of all success starved RFC fans.  I think what I want to know is this?

What major sponsors are we looking at and how much money will they invest?
Minor sponsors as well?
When will the announcements be made and how will this change in future seasons when we enter pre season without a major sponsor.
Where does this fit in with increasing the capacity of our off field coaching and development department.
How much extra will we be able to increase our footy department spending per capita. Does that mean we can recruit more full time staff to look at kids through the year to help FJ and co.
Our 4 million dollar debt how are we working to eradicate it.
We can't simply be looking at acquiring 75000 members by 2014.
What if we fail on field what plan B and C is in place off field to achieve debt eradication.

From my personal point of view I am a RFC club and social club member and coterie groups from my part I see very sceptically as being antequated and living in the past and sticking their nose into footy department matters. Sure we may have moved on from that to an extent but why are you running now as opposed to 2004 or before that since you have been heavily involved in the club. From my point of view we need transperancy from you Phil to tell us why now in 2010 and not previously as well as answering real questions that affect the off field aspect of the club and the $$$$ invested in it as well as the eradication of debt. Token spruiking on different sites won't win my vote. I think you need to follow your lead and answer these questions Phil to at least make your campaign look credible whether we vote for you or not. Just my rant.

Offline Carvels Ring

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #46 on: November 17, 2010, 05:33:18 PM »
To Carvels Ring,

You seem to have the answers for everything, why don't you put yourself out there and run for the board, you obviously know more than everybody else.

And trying to make a difference is never a waste of time.

Dorothy Dix!  Had no idea what you were talking about, maybe you need to make your accusations clearer.

We are actually allowed to have different opinions without the sarcasm

mate if it smells like a duck it's  duck

Offline Carvels Ring

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #47 on: November 17, 2010, 05:35:33 PM »
To Carvels Ring,

You seem to have the answers for everything, why don't you put yourself out there and run for the board, you obviously know more than everybody else.

And trying to make a difference is never a waste of time.

Dorothy Dix!  Had no idea what you were talking about, maybe you need to make your accusations clearer.

We are actually allowed to have different opinions without the sarcasm

this the whole point mate, u have nailed it.  I am not running for the board, but i get to vote.  This phil bloke is the one who needs to provide the answers.  He hasnt yet.  Time to root yrself in the real world mate.

FNM

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #48 on: November 17, 2010, 05:52:32 PM »
where is that Clayton fellow :lol

David is actually back posting to other Richmond forums again after a self-imposed 'exile'.  Laugh if you need to Jack but he had the club's best interests at heart and he has put in many many many hours of unpaid volunteer work over the years.  A lot of other self-important judgmental people can't say the same.
It would be great to see him on the board and have some knob get up at the agm and ask him a million and one boring questions  :lol

Offline Carvels Ring

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #49 on: November 17, 2010, 06:04:07 PM »
aha!  Pahoff again, Froarsy!

Offline PhilipAnderson

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #50 on: November 17, 2010, 06:08:26 PM »
Hi, I have been reading this forum for a while and this thread has made me join up so I can have a say!

I agree with Phillip, that as a one eyed tiger supporter, that I am sick of hearing about us being on the right track!!

If we had been on the right track for the last 10 years as they have been saying, surely we would have seen some results on the field, as really they are the only results that matter.

Financially we may not be in the best position but put some wins on the board and that would change very quickly, how can you continue to market a product that is just promises and never delivers results.

Making change for change sake, why don't you want change!   Everybody was happy to make Terry Wallace accountable, why not the board?  Are you happy with 15th in 2011 9th in 2012 15th in 2013 and then watch Damien Hardwick get sacked and start all over again.  Lets not forget that Damien Hardwick is accountable to the same board that Terry Wallace was accountable to and they obviously ok'd everything that Terry Wallace was doing.  Do we just wait until it fails again and listen to the speel over and over.

Why isn't the board accountable for losses, until we start winning some games I will keep voting for change.

I would like to know from Phillip exactly what he thinks he can do to help Richmond put wins on the board, in what way does he feel the board is not performing?  What are they not doing that he thinks he can do better?

We all want the same thing in the end, a premeirship, and expecting anything less from our board is letting our team down.

Thanks for letting me rant

I'm a Richmond supporter to and rant every now and then on this forum. Does it qualify me to run for the board? Answer the questions rather than telling us about an agenda that pulls at the heartstrings of all success starved RFC fans.  I think what I want to know is this?

What major sponsors are we looking at and how much money will they invest?
Minor sponsors as well?
When will the announcements be made and how will this change in future seasons when we enter pre season without a major sponsor.
Where does this fit in with increasing the capacity of our off field coaching and development department.
How much extra will we be able to increase our footy department spending per capita. Does that mean we can recruit more full time staff to look at kids through the year to help FJ and co.
Our 4 million dollar debt how are we working to eradicate it.
We can't simply be looking at acquiring 75000 members by 2014.
What if we fail on field what plan B and C is in place off field to achieve debt eradication.

From my personal point of view I am a RFC club and social club member and coterie groups from my part I see very sceptically as being antequated and living in the past and sticking their nose into footy department matters. Sure we may have moved on from that to an extent but why are you running now as opposed to 2004 or before that since you have been heavily involved in the club. From my point of view we need transperancy from you Phil to tell us why now in 2010 and not previously as well as answering real questions that affect the off field aspect of the club and the $$$$ invested in it as well as the eradication of debt. Token spruiking on different sites won't win my vote. I think you need to follow your lead and answer these questions Phil to at least make your campaign look credible whether we vote for you or not. Just my rant.

Tuckerbag,

Happy for you to clear the air.

I am not on the board at this time and the questions that you are requiring answers must come from the current board members. I am at this time like you a Richmond member. The only difference between us now is that I have put my hand up to run for the board, but this does not entitle me to the all of the answers that the current board have within their possession. I will be only made aware of this information officially, as and when the club decides that the membership should be made aware of this or if I am successful in my endeavours gaining a seat on the board.

I can answer some of the other questions though. Prior to my involvement with Richmond I lived in Sydney for 12 years running my business there before moving the head office to Melbourne where I was educated and raised. Running for the board is a serious thing to do, it requires a significant time committment. Up until now, I was unable to make that time committment. Combine that with some of the reasons that I have made available on my Blog and that added up to running in 2010.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #51 on: November 17, 2010, 06:49:23 PM »
There's 5 candidates......

There are 9 positions on the board.
The people that are up for nomination are:

Gary March Board Member re-nominating
Peggy Haines Board Member re-nominating
John Matthies Board Member re-nominating
Neil McKay
Philip Anderson

There are 3 positions available and there are 5 people to fill these 3 positions.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=19596002&postcount=39

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #52 on: November 17, 2010, 06:57:46 PM »
Thanks for answering Phil.

But as a voter other than what you have mentioned I am sure there are plans and agendas that you would like to submit to the board regardless of whether you are privy or not to all the details that the board preside over rather than a campaign which broadly addresses a blueprint that what members may or may not want.

Other than at an AGM when the books are open in such a case as when a board member is up for election I think it would be wise for the Club to release such details. Possibly this might be another agenda point which makes it easier for members to vote for a candidate. I just think it is prudent. I think eradicating this 4 million dollar debt and spending more on our footy dept is an essential ingredient to on field success.

Phillip, I am not doubting your love for the RFC and your success in business and I wish you all the best I think it is just sensible for the members to want to ask the necessary questions. This period over the next few years are critical for the club considering the failure of the Wallace regime. I would not want the hard yards already put in by Brendan Gale and co as well as Hardwick and the off field dept to count for nought.

Another aspect that I find very important is the draw.

Will we have a greater voice or voice our opinion more loudly and play all our home games at the MCG as well as playing yearly home games against Carlton Essendon and Collingwood and once our deals interstate are done we can still play our games at the MCG. Will we play home games at the G against interstate sides like Port Freo.  In order to attain this for example a proposal would be to play an Easter Monday home game against Collingwood each year alternating home sides. In 1977 we drew 91000 our biggest ever home crowd. Thus guaranteeing extra revenue, except when Easter falls on the Anzac weekend.

As a big 4 side how will we look to maintain this or reignite this. We have Dreamtime with Essendon, Opening game against Carlton maybe Easter Monday against the Magpies $$$$$.

We need more off field clout especially from the board. We are constantly bullied by other sides and what other sides get away with we fail abysmally by not even voicing a whimper. Eg Tribunal hearings. In time maybe re kindling that Graeme Richmond us against them would rather be hated feared and respected by our peers than looked down upon. Clubs like St Kilda the Doggies North and Hawthorn are our inferiors traditionally and we should not just stand back and watch them succeed while we stumble. What would you as a board member do in the case of Jake King getting rubbed out on the evidence given by Travis Cloke said. As a club how do we take that based on the unwritten law of not dobbing in anyone at the Match Revue Panel.  Just some things to mull over that I believe give our club a stronger identity.


Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2445
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #53 on: November 17, 2010, 07:54:55 PM »
Enough already - just tell us why we should vote for you.

We don't want a politician, we want a straight shooter with vision to make us the club we were under Graeme Richmond - Amen

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #54 on: November 17, 2010, 07:59:52 PM »
personally i think when choice is available the only winner is our football club...i want to see the best people represent richmond and that can only be done when we encourage our faithfull to speak up and make a stand.

Offline Carvels Ring

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #55 on: November 17, 2010, 08:23:47 PM »
personally i think when choice is available the only winner is our football club...i want to see the best people represent richmond and that can only be done when we encourage our faithfull to speak up and make a stand.


i agree completely. And this is exactly why this Phil bloke is so disappointing.  he has nothing to say, he wont answer questions, he posts the same on here and other sites and he is all hyperbole and fluff.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #56 on: November 17, 2010, 08:52:53 PM »
Considering the cost of the election to the club if you are a losing candidate will you make a contribution to the club in regards to the cost of the election?

1965

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #57 on: November 17, 2010, 08:55:24 PM »
personally i think when choice is available the only winner is our football club...i want to see the best people represent richmond and that can only be done when we encourage our faithfull to speak up and make a stand.


i agree completely. And this is exactly why this Phil bloke is so disappointing.  he has nothing to say, he wont answer questions, he posts the same on here and other sites and he is all hyperbole and fluff.

Listen you old bastard

You know I love you dearly but...

FFS give it a rest.

 :lol

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40321
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #58 on: November 17, 2010, 10:02:11 PM »
There's 5 candidates......

There are 9 positions on the board.
The people that are up for nomination are:

Gary March Board Member re-nominating
Peggy Haines Board Member re-nominating
John Matthies Board Member re-nominating
Neil McKay
Philip Anderson

There are 3 positions available and there are 5 people to fill these 3 positions.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=19596002&postcount=39


Hmmm Neil McKay as well - he is on the Coburg Board IIRC
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Richmond Board Nomination
« Reply #59 on: November 17, 2010, 11:30:31 PM »
where is that Clayton fellow :lol

David is actually back posting to other Richmond forums again after a self-imposed 'exile'.  Laugh if you need to Jack but he had the club's best interests at heart and he has put in many many many hours of unpaid volunteer work over the years.  A lot of other self-important judgmental people can't say the same.
It would be great to see him on the board and have some knob get up at the agm and ask him a million and one boring questions  :lol
David Clayton still hasn't touched his old website since the day he bailed because the Club drafted Cuz.

http://members.iinet.net.au/~dcstar/
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd