Author Topic: RFC Official - We're on board!  (Read 454734 times)

Offline RFC_Official

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 863
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #600 on: July 02, 2013, 10:36:24 AM »

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #601 on: July 02, 2013, 11:18:14 AM »
Who won the stuffing medal? FFS  :banghead

Tweet me bro

Tyrone.

yeah 24 hours after the game

got a pic of him with the medal straight after the game?

Offline RFC_Official

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 863
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #602 on: July 02, 2013, 11:27:07 AM »
Who won the stuffing medal? FFS  :banghead

Tweet me bro

Tyrone.

yeah 24 hours after the game

got a pic of him with the medal straight after the game?

It wasnt awarded after the game.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #603 on: July 02, 2013, 11:32:49 AM »
Why not?

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #604 on: July 02, 2013, 12:38:47 PM »
You're not going to let this one go are you Gerks?   :lol

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #605 on: July 02, 2013, 12:56:50 PM »
Last year



This year















 ::)

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #606 on: July 02, 2013, 01:59:28 PM »
Who won the stuffing medal? FFS  :banghead

Tweet me bro

Tyrone.

yeah 24 hours after the game

got a pic of him with the medal straight after the game?

It wasnt awarded after the game.

 :-\

As Gerks said, why not?

It's a fair question to ask. What is the answer?

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #607 on: July 02, 2013, 02:20:20 PM »
The question is so fair and obvious that an answer should have been given before the question was even asked.

"It wasn't awarded after the game because..."

It took 22 hours from the final siren for the winner to be announced – without even a comment from the winner or a photo to show he had received it – just a hastily put together re-hash of the article that was published on the club's website last week.

Exceptionally poor effort or a set of exceptional circumstances?

Offline RFC_Official

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 863
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #608 on: July 02, 2013, 02:35:42 PM »
The question is so fair and obvious that an answer should have been given before the question was even asked.

"It wasn't awarded after the game because..."

It took 22 hours from the final siren for the winner to be announced – without even a comment from the winner or a photo to show he had received it – just a hastily put together re-hash of the article that was published on the club's website last week.

Exceptionally poor effort or a set of exceptional circumstances?

There was a change to the voting system for this year, wasnt done at the ground/on the day. Hence the delay.

Offline Oiafi

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Against logic there is no armour like ignorance.
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #609 on: July 02, 2013, 02:48:38 PM »
They should use the coaches votes for the medal.

Some of the voting from the journos was ridiculous. I take it some of them weren't at the match. TW is on another planet I'm sure.

No offense to Ty since he did have a good game but, and no offense to Cotch either, how on earth did Cotch nearly win it?

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #610 on: July 02, 2013, 02:49:21 PM »
The question is so fair and obvious that an answer should have been given before the question was even asked.

"It wasn't awarded after the game because..."

It took 22 hours from the final siren for the winner to be announced – without even a comment from the winner or a photo to show he had received it – just a hastily put together re-hash of the article that was published on the club's website last week.

Exceptionally poor effort or a set of exceptional circumstances?

There was a change to the voting system for this year, wasnt done at the ground/on the day. Hence the delay.

So an exceptionally poor effort. Hardly surprising. Cheers for clearing that up mate  :thumbsup

Sucks to be Vicks

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #611 on: July 03, 2013, 06:14:18 AM »
The question is so fair and obvious that an answer should have been given before the question was even asked.

"It wasn't awarded after the game because..."

It took 22 hours from the final siren for the winner to be announced – without even a comment from the winner or a photo to show he had received it – just a hastily put together re-hash of the article that was published on the club's website last week.

Exceptionally poor effort or a set of exceptional circumstances?

There was a change to the voting system for this year, wasnt done at the ground/on the day. Hence the delay.

So an exceptionally poor effort. Hardly surprising. Cheers for clearing that up mate  :thumbsup

Sucks to be Vicks

The Chris Masters of OER  :clapping I can think of better excuses, price Waterhouse had to audit the votes first?
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #612 on: July 03, 2013, 10:16:30 AM »
What a great system. Should be done for the Norm Smith too from the FoxFooty studio crappers

For background ambience the afl could could pay Rod the mod to belt out Sailing

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #613 on: July 03, 2013, 08:27:58 PM »
Actually, on reflection, any of Jake from the Blues Brothers excuses for jilting the Carrie Fisher character at the alter when pleading for forgiveness in the sewer would be better excuses than the one given
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #614 on: July 04, 2013, 01:08:47 PM »
Hey RFCO, how long will the current membership deal (sign for 2014 get rest of 2013 free) last?