Author Topic: Non-Richmond games 2011  (Read 101123 times)

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #30 on: March 27, 2011, 03:45:25 PM »
Essendon have had an enormous Pre Season, there is still 24 weeks until Finals.

They working hard as anyone at the moment and have a full squad.

So many dogs players look unfit where as the bombers look fit as anything. Commentators are spot on, it's all well and good flying in March and causing upsets but the challenge for Hird is doing it consistently over the next 30 weeks.

Expectations will explode and make it harder as well.

Confidence is an amazing thing.

Go Tigers!

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #31 on: March 27, 2011, 04:03:08 PM »
surely the bulldogs will bounce back next week with a win over the lions after coming off this big upset.


Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7359
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #32 on: March 27, 2011, 04:48:53 PM »
Essendon have had an enormous Pre Season, there is still 24 weeks until Finals.

They working hard as anyone at the moment and have a full squad.

So many dogs players look unfit where as the bombers look fit as anything. Commentators are spot on, it's all well and good flying in March and causing upsets but the challenge for Hird is doing it consistently over the next 30 weeks.

Expectations will explode and make it harder as well.

Confidence is an amazing thing.



I would take a win like that over any team at any time these days.

If we think we are better than the bombers I think we may be kidding ourselves.

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #33 on: March 27, 2011, 07:28:58 PM »
Essendon have had an enormous Pre Season, there is still 24 weeks until Finals.

They working hard as anyone at the moment and have a full squad.

So many dogs players look unfit where as the bombers look fit as anything. Commentators are spot on, it's all well and good flying in March and causing upsets but the challenge for Hird is doing it consistently over the next 30 weeks.

Expectations will explode and make it harder as well.

Confidence is an amazing thing.



I would take a win like that over any team at any time these days.

If we think we are better than the bombers I think we may be kidding ourselves.

Rodney Eade said Essendon is a top four team, certain top-eight team at the post game press conference.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #34 on: March 27, 2011, 07:33:05 PM »
CUB we are not better than the Bombers now and at any stage in the last 3 years.

They had the list they had the talent they were just coached by a bloke who had no idea

Knights nice guy good player but I hope he doesn't come anywhere near our players in a football capacity

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #35 on: March 27, 2011, 08:11:11 PM »
Essendon will finish bottom 6.


Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #36 on: March 27, 2011, 08:28:56 PM »
footscray looked like richmond circa wallace era today.

Esssendon did look good but next week against sydney who actually can play defensively should give a better idea of where they are at.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #37 on: March 27, 2011, 08:38:19 PM »
CUB we are not better than the Bombers now and at any stage in the last 3 years.

They had the list they had the talent they were just coached by a bloke who had no idea

Knights nice guy good player but I hope he doesn't come anywhere near our players in a football capacity



Can tell you all this, Matthew Knights  was "'white anted "'
They did actually beat saints and bulldogs last year, something we haven't done for years.
They had serious injuries to a number of players last year

They played there best team today against a team that was severely under done

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #38 on: March 27, 2011, 08:42:03 PM »
If matty knights was such a dud, how come he got a $100,000 year coaching job at Xavier Colllege, heading the sports dept??????????
Duds dont get jobs like that,
For what its worth, I listened to him on the ABC while at the game last thursday night, runs rings around David King and Richo in regards to special comments etc.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #39 on: March 27, 2011, 09:13:05 PM »
Im not disputing he isnt a smart bloke. Lets be honest i could deliver better special comments than King.

What i am saying is IMO he was a poor coach. They won games playing offensive but then he refused to flick the switch to a defensive mode.

That for me is poor coaching. The Bombers have never had a poor list they just needed someone to coach them.

Knights's little helpers. Camporeale, Hickmont, Prescott

Wallet's little helpers King, Royal, Monkhurst

Hirds. Bomber, Wellman, Goodwin.

Enough said

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #40 on: March 27, 2011, 09:44:59 PM »
yep, and Matty Knights had a budget for asistant coaches of $500,000 a year
Hird has a budget of $1,500,000 , work it out.
it aint too hard ;)

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #41 on: March 27, 2011, 09:49:16 PM »
yep, and Matty Knights had a budget for asistant coaches of $500,000 a year
Hird has a budget of $1,500,000 , work it out.
it aint too hard ;)

Bomber is on $900K of that. :thumbsup

That's some good coin for a bloke pulling the strings behind the face man Hird.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #42 on: March 27, 2011, 09:53:33 PM »
yep, and Matty Knights had a budget for asistant coaches of $500,000 a year
Hird has a budget of $1,500,000 , work it out.
it aint too hard ;)

Bomber is on $900K of that. :thumbsup

That's some good coin for a bloke pulling the strings behind the face man Hird.

My mail is he is the "'coach "" ( Bomber )

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40311
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #43 on: March 27, 2011, 10:09:05 PM »
Eagles beat N0rt Melb by 4 points

At work in our footy tipping comp a draw is counted as a win

So that's 6 winners for me  ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #44 on: March 27, 2011, 10:17:03 PM »
I read west coast was reduced to 20 men due to injury's through the game and still won.