Author Topic: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st priority [merged]  (Read 29195 times)

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st Priority
« Reply #45 on: July 17, 2011, 10:00:16 PM »
What has rains and tambling got to do with anything?
Your comparing eggs with pineapples!

So maybe you can explain then, if we trade both Foley and Jackson exactly how is it going to fix all the doom and gloom you guys have been preaching over the last couple of weeks?

P.S anyone who has a punt against there own club ain't even close to being a true supporter IMO. It's scum like yourself that the club needs to get rid of waaaaaaaay before any of those players you love so much!

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st Priority
« Reply #46 on: July 17, 2011, 10:07:10 PM »
What has rains and tambling got to do with anything?
Your comparing eggs with pineapples!

So maybe you can explain then, if we trade both Foley and Jackson exactly how is it going to fix all the doom and gloom you guys have been preaching over the last couple of weeks?

P.S anyone who has a punt against there own club ain't even close to being a true supporter IMO. It's scum like yourself that the club needs to get rid of waaaaaaaay before any of those players you love so much!

Sits on a high horse and now a moral and social commentator. Who cares.

If it gets us decent picks then good maybe we may select a Judd or a Hodge or a Cox.

Right now what have we got a team that I would label as underachievers as you have to be able to achieve something to have that label pinned to you in the first place.

Have a dip in some of the waters near the James Boag brewery and maybe the plop plops you post may just read a little better. Only a little in your case.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st Priority
« Reply #47 on: July 17, 2011, 10:12:15 PM »
What has rains and tambling got to do with anything?
Your comparing eggs with pineapples!

So maybe you can explain then, if we trade both Foley and Jackson exactly how is it going to fix all the doom and gloom you guys have been preaching over the last couple of weeks?

P.S anyone who has a punt against there own club ain't even close to being a true supporter IMO. It's scum like yourself that the club needs to get rid of waaaaaaaay before any of those players you love so much!

with the greatest respect its pretty clear that your from tasmania.

I speak slowly so you can understand.

Compromised draft 1. Tambling for compo pick to adelaide
Same draft raines 3rd rounder

Now jackson and Foley are better than those 2 weather you like to believe it or not so chances are einstein we will get a descent kid and get rid of dead wood at the same time.

Now stop touching your date for a minute and look at the bigger picture.

Lose 1 b/c grade
Lose 1 d/e grader

Gain possiblly A grader

Thats smart management and a great way for us to go.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st Priority
« Reply #48 on: July 17, 2011, 10:43:13 PM »
Don't get me wrong, I would be happy to trade both players for what ever we can get. If we can get the picks that WP think we can we need to jump all over it BUT trading these two guys for 17 yo possibles would be playing with fire!
You for one have continually bagged our rucruiting over the duration but yet you are willing to bank these picks on a Possible! Every draft pick is a possible but banking on a couple of 17 yo possibles that will have no impact on the list for at least 3 to 4 is ludercrest! At the moment we are screaming out for a decent ruck and a couple of decent backs, this is where we need to focus our drafting and trading not effing around with 17 yo possibles!

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st Priority
« Reply #49 on: July 17, 2011, 10:49:58 PM »
I heard that this years draft isnt going to be that good. But next years draft may be another 2001.
I heard it on SEN I think.
The club that keeps giving.

Ox

  • Guest
Re: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st Priority
« Reply #50 on: July 17, 2011, 10:51:51 PM »
I heard that this years draft isnt going to be that good. But next years draft may be another 2001.
I heard it on SEN I think.

Good on u! :thumbsup

Ox

  • Guest
Re: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st Priority
« Reply #51 on: July 17, 2011, 11:01:17 PM »
I heard on the radio that it wouldn't make any difference to our club because too many softies follow it.

It was SEN.......I think!

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: RFC should chase the 17yo GWS picks as 1st Priority
« Reply #52 on: July 18, 2011, 09:25:08 AM »
The first 3 posts says everything about Tassie boy here. He assumed that my post was about us getting improvement next year (even though I never mentioned it as an improvement for next year). He failed to understand the basic tenet of my innitial post that we have to try and get some potential A grade footballers onto the list for the future. You have to take a risk sometimes and Richmond needs to take some risks to try and get some potential A graders. Thats what chasing these 17yo picks is about- trying to get some high quality kids onto the list as the first priority. Now if you Tiger from Tassie dont get that it isnt my or our problem. You've come across like a tool in this thread so next time try and read and understand peoples posts properly before beginning to write your nonsense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98225
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond interested in 17 y.o. Jaegar O'Meara via GWS rule (Age)
« Reply #53 on: July 18, 2011, 02:17:12 PM »
O'Meara commits to footy tug-a-war
By Kim Hagdorn
Sports News First
18 July 2011


OUTSTANDING teenage footballer Jaeger O’Meara has become the first player to join a unique bargaining war for his future AFL playing services.

O’Meara confirmed on Monday he will nominate for a historic draft that permits the AFL’s newest organisation Greater Western Sydney to trade off draft picks for four gifted 17-year-olds.

Clubs will offer valuable draft picks or established players to take part in the draft.

Once the trade of picks or players is completed with GWS, the successful club then will have first choice at a privileged list of young talent.

As many as 14 clubs are believed to have already expressed interest to bid for the gifted young stars.

The clubs are understood to have nominated 22 potential recruits under what is known as the Giants “Trade Incentive” scheme.

Jaeger lodged nomination documents with the AFL early this week.

Full article at: http://www.sportsnewsfirst.com.au/articles/2011/07/15/o-meara-commits-to-footy-tug-a-war/

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond interested in 17 y.o. Jaegar O'Meara via GWS rule (Age)
« Reply #54 on: July 18, 2011, 02:30:15 PM »
We won't get him, players like this usually go to clubs like the pies and blues, not us.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: Richmond interested in 17 y.o. Jaegar O'Meara via GWS rule (Age)
« Reply #55 on: July 18, 2011, 02:31:14 PM »
Could Melbourne end up the big winner for losing Tom Scully?

RIVAL clubs fear Melbourne could emerge the big winner if it receives two of the country's best 17-year-olds in return for Tom Scully.

The Dees could trade the compensation picks they get for Scully for two more talented gems from Greater Western Sydney.

Speculation the AFL will hand Melbourne two first-round picks for Scully if he goes to GWS has left clubs concerned the Demons list would benefit greatly from the loss of their ace onballer.

The picks are set to put Melbourne in the front position to win the rights to select the two best players born between January 1 and April 30, 1994. Up to four players born in this age bracket can be traded by GWS over the next two years.

The two-for-one deal would almost certainly include slick midfielder Jaeger O'Meara, considered one of the most gifted players to have moved through the AFL's pathway system.

"If you were at Melbourne you would take that trade in a heartbeat," one AFL recruiter said.

"You save the $700,000 it would otherwise cost you to keep Scully and you get two of the best kids going around including O'Meara, who is the equivalent of Scully, if not probably better.

"O'Meara has all the tools to be a No.1 pick.

"So while that would put Melbourne in an unbelievably strong position, it would disadvantage all the other clubs in the competition, who are in desperate need of an uncompromised draft after two really tough years."

Asked if the deal was realistic and achievable, another industry source said: "Melbourne could give GWS two first-round picks ... maybe two top-10 picks in the 2012 draft, which will be a cracker," he said.

"So as an offer (to GWS) it would be pretty hard to beat, unless you wanted to give up a really good established player as well as a high-end pick."

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/could-melbourne-end-up-the-big-winner-for-losing-tom-scully/story-e6frf9jf-1226096389389
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Online taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Richmond interested in 17 y.o. Jaegar O'Meara via GWS rule (Age)
« Reply #56 on: July 18, 2011, 03:36:59 PM »
We won't get him, players like this usually go to clubs like the pies and blues, not us.

Jaeger will end up @ Freo, hes from Dongara & played @ Railways in the GNFL (gero)

Freo are all over him, & thats from the horses mouth !!

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond interested in 17 y.o. Jaegar O'Meara via GWS rule (Age)
« Reply #57 on: July 18, 2011, 03:42:08 PM »
We won't get him, players like this usually go to clubs like the pies and blues, not us.

Jaeger will end up @ Freo, hes from Dongara & played @ Railways in the GNFL (gero)

Freo are all over him, & thats from the horses mouth !!

Yeah, just trying to point out he won't be at tigerland.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in 17 y.o. Jaegar O'Meara via GWS rule (Age)
« Reply #58 on: July 18, 2011, 03:44:41 PM »
If Freo give up The Giant Freak they might get him

What else are they going to offer GWS? Pav? Fyfe? Not going to happen.

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in 17 y.o. Jaegar O'Meara via GWS rule (Age)
« Reply #59 on: July 18, 2011, 03:49:24 PM »
Sheedys up to all his old tricks with these 17yo picks. Some club is seriously going to overpay IMHO.