Are you kidding me? Geelong and Collingwood not having any A Graders?
What do you call brownlow medalists Bartel and Swan? Norm Smith Pendlebury? Match winner Thomas? 25 time All Australian Full back Matthew Scarlett. Gary Ablett Jnr? Mircale worker Steve Johnson? Paul Chapman?
I've never heard so much crap in my life. A side full of B and C graders goes no where. If you want to support a team like that go support Essendon they have the perfect list for you.
Unbelievable.
read the post again before u go shooting from the hip Pope i said 2 years ago for collingwood and geelong 6 years ago not now...
Point is dont be so hasty about A graders. Sometimes they take a while to shine and players u thought were just b graders can turn into matchwinning a-graders. Which supporter 4 years ago thought swan would be elite? lol he was a deadset dribbler!!! Thomas I always rated but most thought he was nothing more than a flashy type, Cloke was considered a bust, Reid a dud who couldnt kick, Johnson a one trick pony, H.Shaw couldnt defend - i could go on and on, NOW MOST OF THEM ARE DEADSET A OR B+ GRADERS.
Geelong wanted to trade out Bartel, Kelly and Corey players who were ALL considered nothing more than solid one paced plodders Richmond rejected Bartel and Stevie J for Otto!!! lol. My point is sometimes with some patience you can unearth matchwinners from within that you may have thought werent there.
lets get in more solid contributors bc its easier to find solid performers than out and out matchwinners in every draft.
cheers Y&B at least some understood my point
Apologies for mis reading the post.
I see your point and understand it and has merit. However it's heavily reliant on development and timing. We pick up more depth in D graders that have potential to improve it can backfire.
Problem 1: We pick up a 18yo kid D grader that could develop into a potential B, fails to develop properly - Connors, Gourdis, Jackson, Edwards (These are all mid round draft picks that have failed to develop).
pppffftt and im told to do his research. yes im nit picking.dan connors 4th rnd selection 58 how many on average go after pick 50.gourdis a psd pick taken after the nd was complete. he was then rookied.
jackson an early 4th rnd pick taken at 53. and edwards the only earlyish pick among them a 2nd rounder at 26 and a waste. some of us have been saying it for 5 yrs.
what do we expect from 4th rnd picks and junior psd picks. 1 in 3 or worse to to make it maybe.
if people think every pick or every player bought to the club will make it are kidding themselves. it takes time and hard work to build a decent list. it would not be uncommon to go thru 3 or 4 players gradually upgrading on each player to fill a spot on the list.
we only have guaranteed 1 first rnd pick each yr and we only get 1 2nd rounder. with these two you hope for at least a good player thru to a maximum elite. then other things come into it. deep draft shallow draft. etc.
our better credentialled players are actually performing to a high level but they cant carry so many b/s players.and with the load at times they drop away dramatically as well.
no one in his right mind would argue you dont need A graders.but A graders are the thin edge of the wedge. real improvement comes from upgrading b/s players for plain old capable core list players and if need be the core list player for a very good player, and of course you try and get the odd very good to elite player with them.