so you honestly think we are good enough to match it with carlton?
If people think we are good enough currently to match it with Carlton and when we lose by 44 points call it a terrible loss then look at the issue this way.
Judd was serviceable against us without being explosive.
Murphy was clearly their best.
What of the lower tiers impact on the result in Betts, Yarran, Garlett, Sipmson, Scotland, Armfield just to name a few compared to our lower tier of Jackson, Edwards, Tuck, Vickery, Nahas, Post.
People have ranted on what they will or won't be doing on what Dimma does at selection this week and the possibilities/probabilities of Jako and Edwards being selected for Saturday yet some think we are not a 44 point worse off side than Carlton and others label it a loser mentality at the club rather than we are at that awkward stage where the kids coming through are getting the game time they need but due to depth we unfortunantely still have issues with blokes like Jako Tuck and Edwards getting regular senior footy.
Its okay to be frustrated its manipulative to stretch the truth beyond its limitations merely to serve a desperate and unrealistic end result.
