Author Topic: Richmond V Port rnd 6  (Read 23404 times)

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #225 on: May 06, 2012, 06:12:19 PM »
Bugger about the goal to them after the siren.

Final Score.

Richmond   3.2    8.7    9.10   13.13-91
Port Adel.   1.2    2.2     6.4     8.6-54

Goals: Riewoldt 4, Nahas 3, King 2, Miller, Deledio, Newman, Conca.


One decent qtr got us the win.
Considering we won 3 quaters , thtas a bit harsh MT !!!

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #226 on: May 06, 2012, 06:18:21 PM »
Bugger about the goal to them after the siren.

Final Score.

Richmond   3.2    8.7    9.10   13.13-91
Port Adel.   1.2    2.2     6.4     8.6-54

Goals: Riewoldt 4, Nahas 3, King 2, Miller, Deledio, Newman, Conca.


One decent qtr got us the win.
Considering we won 3 quaters , thtas a bit harsh MT !!!

I don't think that at all. Al though I am happy we won by 6 golas our let down in the third quarter cost us a 10 goal win and again it these lapses that the better sides like Geelong and West Coast have punished severely in the last two weeks. A win is a win but a 4 quarter effort in games like this is important especially kicking with the wind and kicking the first goal in the third quarter.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #227 on: May 06, 2012, 06:21:09 PM »
Maric had a field day. Lids was good as was tuck.
I saw something from dea today.
Hopefully I'll see more in the future.
The club that keeps giving.

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #228 on: May 06, 2012, 06:22:41 PM »
Good win in those conditions, Tuck was awesome again  :thumbsup

Your boy Butcher got a bath today. Almost as much value as Griffiths IMHO.

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #229 on: May 06, 2012, 06:24:15 PM »
Bugger about the goal to them after the siren.

Final Score.

Richmond   3.2    8.7    9.10   13.13-91
Port Adel.   1.2    2.2     6.4     8.6-54

Goals: Riewoldt 4, Nahas 3, King 2, Miller, Deledio, Newman, Conca.


One decent qtr got us the win.
Considering we won 3 quaters , thtas a bit harsh MT !!!

I don't think that at all. Al though I am happy we won by 6 golas our let down in the third quarter cost us a 10 goal win and again it these lapses that the better sides like Geelong and West Coast have punished severely in the last two weeks. A win is a win but a 4 quarter effort in games like this is important especially kicking with the wind and kicking the first goal in the third quarter.
Although the flags told us something different, the scoring end was the end port chose to kick to in the first quarter. Therefore our first quarter could be considered a decent quarter also!

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #230 on: May 06, 2012, 06:25:15 PM »
Good win in those conditions, Tuck was awesome again  :thumbsup

Your boy Butcher got a bath today. Almost as much value as Griffiths IMHO.

Yeh I hadnt seen him play before and he stank bad.

What about missing that sitter of a goal LMAO

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #231 on: May 06, 2012, 06:26:35 PM »
Good win in those conditions, Tuck was awesome again  :thumbsup

Your boy Butcher got a bath today. Almost as much value as Griffiths IMHO.

Yeah great conditions for big forwards you reckon.
But in saying that l dont give a rats ass about Butcher as he plays for someone else, but he has shown he can play AFL football.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #232 on: May 06, 2012, 06:38:29 PM »
Cometti is a flog, and suggested we should drop to the bottom and pick up more top draft picks as we've missed out the laste few years with gc and gws.
I've calmed down since the game has finished.
Good first half, few mistakes but it was also average conditions
After that is questionable and so frustrating
Umpiring below abysmal- I have no words for it.
They intentionally brought port back into the game and imo they were told to do it by powers above.
Imo Benny Gale and his team should contact the afl first thing about the umpiring.
Tuck, maric excellent and jack not far behind- I think he is great for someone who is clearly injured and you can tell he has a problem when he sprays them to the left.
Morris also great on a ground he's familiar with
Houli I thought was dissapointing today
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #233 on: May 06, 2012, 06:40:54 PM »
even bruce made a comment about the umpires wanting port to win
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #234 on: May 06, 2012, 06:44:35 PM »
even bruce made a comment about the umpires wanting port to win
Yep wish they would just worry about umpiring the game rather than coming back after half time trying to even the penalty count up

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #235 on: May 06, 2012, 06:47:27 PM »
Cometti is a flog, and suggested we should drop to the bottom and pick up more top draft picks as we've missed out the laste few years with gc and gws.
I've calmed down since the game has finished.
Good first half, few mistakes but it was also average conditions
After that is questionable and so frustrating
Umpiring below abysmal- I have no words for it.
They intentionally brought port back into the game and imo they were told to do it by powers above.
Imo Benny Gale and his team should contact the afl first thing about the umpiring.
Tuck, maric excellent and jack not far behind- I think he is great for someone who is clearly injured and you can tell he has a problem when he sprays them to the left.
Morris also great on a ground he's familiar with
Houli I thought was dissapointing today
the umpiring wasn't nearly as bad as last night. The saints should order the AFL to investigate some of the worst decisions I've seen in a game of footy. Gave the dawks atleast 4 goals.

Yes I agree Houli was very bad today.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #236 on: May 06, 2012, 07:04:07 PM »

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #237 on: May 06, 2012, 07:14:41 PM »
Good win in those conditions, Tuck was awesome again  :thumbsup

Your boy Butcher got a bath today. Almost as much value as Griffiths IMHO.

Yeah great conditions for big forwards you reckon.
But in saying that l dont give a rats ass about Butcher as he plays for someone else, but he has shown he can play AFL football.
But our professed dud in Riewoldt managed to kick 4.  ;)

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #238 on: May 06, 2012, 07:29:50 PM »
Jack was a dud today, got a few gifts as well, he ends up with 4 and everyone comes out of the woodwork saying he had a solid game. Was good in the final quarter first 3 was nothing short of disgraceful

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #239 on: May 06, 2012, 07:31:28 PM »
Jack was a dud today, got a few gifts as well, he ends up with 4 and everyone comes out of the woodwork saying he had a solid game. Was good in the final quarter first 3 was nothing short of disgraceful

Obviously didnt see when he attacked the contest and set up a goal with handball